Environmental poisoning
December 09, 2009

In a nutshell:
"Nutrient logic dictates that humans cannot thrive without key nutrients, and that today's health threats are simply the result of gaping nutrient deficiencies. In contrast to a focus on choking down symptom masking drugs, nutrient logic addresses the cause and conquers illness by filling the corresponding deficiency. The process is as simple and logical as resurrecting a dying, sun-deprived plant with sun exposure and water. A mountain of scientific evidence supports this logic if you really need proof. As a pharmaceutical chemist, I've been studying it for more than twenty years. And the evidence has always proven that nutrient logic can improve people's health while saving them money."
"Nutrient logic isn't alternative medicine. It's scientifically proven, evidence-based medicine supported by historical data as well as today's most advanced techniques of medicinal chemistry...." As usual the book sites full references to substantiate this.
This book does not discuss health at the "symptom level." but is based on body's most fundamental level, the cell. This gives "a vantage point by highlighting the biological mechanisms underlying the cause of symptoms before they develop. Monitoring cell function offers insight into our "health trajectory." That's far better than relying on shoddy studies bought and paid for by Big Pharma that simply study symptoms and the statistical associations that come with them.
Like mapping the flight path of an asteroid and predicting its location years from now, monitoring cellular function helps identify big health problems years or even decades before they start."
Shane Ellison's book cuts to the core and treads where few if any have gone. It teaches simple lifestyle changes along with navigation skills needed to overcome the hype from both the mainstream and alternative health self serving camps.
Continue reading "Over-The-Counter Natural Cures"
posted by Chris Gupta on Wednesday December 9 2009
updated on Thursday December 10 2009
Permalink
| No comments
| No trackbacks
Trackback link: http://communicationagents.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.r484.cgi/2512
November 27, 2009
Further to: Fluoride - Final Submissions Due Fri., Nov. 27, 2009
These comments were sent to:
CDW Secretariat <water_eau@hc-sc.gc.ca> [CDW = Federal-Provincial-Territorial Committee on Drinking Water, authors of report] Satish Deshpande <Satish.deshpande@ontario.ca> [Ontario Ministry of Environment, Department of Drinking Water Standards] Minister, MOE <minister.moe@ontario.ca> [Ontario Ministry of Environment] Environmental Commissioner of Ontario <commissioner@eco.on.ca>
For over 60 years we have been forced and subjected to water fluoridation without supportable scientific evidence on the efficacy of this substance. Now here again is - the total regurgitation of the same junk science*. It is abundantly clear that the panel for this Health Canada review was chosen specifically to continue this disgraceful tradition by deliberately cherry picking data to support a predetermined outcome!
*See also: http://fluoridealert.org/re/canada.report.response.clinch.pdf
http://fluoridealert.org/re/canada.report.omissions.clinch.pdf
http://fluoridealert.org/re/connett.canada.11-11.09.pdf
Given the abundance of excellent science on Fluoride toxicity, it boggles the mind that this, supposed learned, panel could over look the following:
It is common sense, in that, we should not medicate anyone unless the dose is appropriate to the patient. Hence mass fluoride medication cannot be the same for a thirsty diabetic with comprised kidneys, a 3-year-old toddler and a 35-year-old construction worker. All should require different amounts of medication and not be subject to the same tolerances of this (or any) medication.
Clearly this dosage responsibility lies with each individual and her/his practitioner to determine for themselves. How could this panel, of so called experts claim, such differing dosages are safe for all? The real concerns of the community namely: the collateral damage such as, "impairments to the liver, kidney, brain, bones, pineal gland, thyroid, and yes - even teeth** (these too are clearly dependent on dosage and have severe effects on those with compromised nutrition, health and/or immune systems) are summarily ignored.
These major health impairments continue to trump the paltry, if not outright questionable, benefits to teeth so why are these not properly addressed in the review?
** They tell us that molted teeth from fluoridation of water is just a cosmetic effect. When in fact this is a proof positive sign of bone damage. In the British Medical Journal (B.M.J.), October 7, 2000 it is reported that 48% of children who live in fluoridated communities have developed dental fluorosis (damaged bone) due to fluoride overdose. Now then, if the bone is damaged how are you going to get fewer cavities? This demonstrates that ingesting of fluoridated water to reduce tooth decay is clearly a myth.
What expertize did this panel have on Fluoride's toxicity let alone on the untested waste substance hydrofluorosilcic acid (used to fluoridate) that contains variable quantities of arsenic, lead among other toxic residues?
We are not allowed to adulterate our foods with any amount of lead, arsenic etc. The panel failed to show, why such adulteration of water can be an exception?
While Health Canada continues to panic about lead, is this panel not aware that Fluoride is more toxic than lead?
If yes, than why does it, or anyone, want to continue to put such toxic substances in our water?
Continue reading "Comments on: "Fluoride in Drinking Water""
posted by Chris Gupta on Friday November 27 2009
Permalink
| No comments
| No trackbacks
Trackback link: http://communicationagents.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.r484.cgi/2509
November 24, 2009
Final submissions to the Canadian Drinking Water Secretariat (water_eau@hc-sc.gc.ca) are due this Friday, November 27, 2009. Please consider submitting a response to this document.
The well-known requirements of science are not sufficiently fulfilled in this document:
- omission of citations for claims, (e.g., conflicting claims in the English and French translations had no citation to verify which claim was correct);
- omissions of research which do not support conclusions, including research by panel members selected to do this review;
- a review panel was chosen with conflicts of interest, and who demonstrate a lack of expertise in artificial water fluoridation;
- misrepresentation the National Research Council Review 2006;
- use of a double standard for claims of benefits and claims of harm whereby poor quality science demonstrating efficacy is accepted uncritically whereas claims of harm are dismissed if the evidence is not of the highest quality.
Any of the following peer-reviewed responses to the CDW secretariat are available for you to submit in whole or in part.
Carole Clinch
(a) letter: http://fluoridealert.org/re/canada.report.letter.clinch.pdf
(b) response: http://fluoridealert.org/re/canada.report.response.clinch.pdf
(c) omissions: http://fluoridealert.org/re/canada.report.omissions.clinch.pdf
Paul Connett
response: http://fluoridealert.org/re/connett.canada.11-11.09.pdf
- EMAIL to:
- CDW Secretariat <water_eau@hc-sc.gc.ca> [CDW = Federal-Provincial-Territorial Committee on Drinking Water, authors of report]
- Satish Deshpande <Satish.deshpande@ontario.ca> [Ontario Ministry of Environment, Department of Drinking Water Standards]
- Minister, MOE <minister.moe@ontario.ca> [Ontario Ministry of Environment]
- Environmental Commissioner of Ontario <commissioner@eco.on.ca>
Thank you,
Carole Clinch, BA, BPHE Research Coordinator, People for Safe Drinking Water
posted by Chris Gupta on Tuesday November 24 2009
Permalink
| No comments
| No trackbacks
Trackback link: http://communicationagents.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.r484.cgi/2508
October 26, 2009
The following brochures have been made by "People for Safe Drinking Water" to respond to half truths and blatant misinformation.
Brochures
CAPE Fluoridation statement
Great Lakes United (GLU) position
3 NRC 2006 Review Committee members:
Dr. Limeback 2009 Position Statement
Dr. Isaacson 2009 Position Statement
Dr. Thiessen Issues for Consideration
Environmental Effects
Canadian Statement on Artificial Water Fluoridation
Fact Sheet for First Nations
Fluoride in Foods and Beverages
Health Effects
Fluoride and Cancer
Continue reading "People for Safe Drinking Water"
posted by Chris Gupta on Monday October 26 2009
updated on Sunday February 7 2010
Permalink
| Comments (1)
| No trackbacks
Trackback link: http://communicationagents.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.r484.cgi/2501
Over-The-Counter Natural Cures
December 09, 2009
Comments on: "Fluoride in Drinking Water"
November 27, 2009
Fluoride - Final Submissions Due Fri., Nov. 27, 2009
November 24, 2009
People for Safe Drinking Water
October 26, 2009
Finally US EPA & Europe Recognize Toxicity of Fluoride
June 15, 2009
DIETARY HEALING
December 04, 2008
Harper's Pentagon North
October 07, 2008
Elections 2008: Restoring the Health of the Nation
October 01, 2008
More Fluoride Madness!
September 21, 2008
GM Potatoes
September 06, 2008
Re: Council Of Canadians Policy On Bottled Water Ban
August 19, 2008
Paradox Of Searching For A Cancer Cure - Why Eat Organic?
August 12, 2008
Fluoride's Impact on Brain - Focus of Two Conferences
August 04, 2008
We Are The Government And We Are Here To Protect You! Bills C-51 & 52
June 24, 2008
Fundamental Change In Farming? IAATD UN Report
June 08, 2008
Bills C-51 & C-52 Example letters
May 28, 2008
GE Labelling - Government Adamant To Pass Bills C-51 & C-52
May 25, 2008
Corrupt to the Core - Memoirs of a Health Canada Scientist - Bill 517: GE Labeling
April 14, 2008
Squelching Information For Profit - Finally, JOM Archives Online
April 08, 2008
Shedding Light on Genetically Engineered Food
March 19, 2008
Fluoride: Boiling the Frog Slowly
January 29, 2008
Water Toxicity - Hydrofluorosilicic acid
January 28, 2008
Health Canada or Sickness Canada? - Fluoridation At Any Cost!
November 29, 2007
Water Treatment With Silcofluorides And Lead Toxicity
October 16, 2007
Fluoride - Poisoning Our Children
September 22, 2007
Finally Monsanto's Inherently Illegal Patents Rejected!
September 16, 2007
Cell Phones - Ear, Eye Damage, High Blood Pressure & More!
August 22, 2007
ADA Caves In - FDA Under Fire For Protecting Mercury Fillings
August 01, 2007
Early Detection Myth - Screening (For Cancer etc.) Fails Test
July 23, 2007
Plants Uptake Antibiotics
July 15, 2007
Professionals' Statement Calling For End To To Fluoridation
July 05, 2007
Grass-Fed Beef Healthier Than Salmon?
May 15, 2007
Genetically Engineered (GE) Insects Soon In Canada?
May 14, 2007
April/May 2007 Codex Report (Ottawa, Canada)
May 10, 2007
No ORGANIC Bee losses - Bees Immune Systems Damaged
May 08, 2007
An American Court Bans Genetically Modified Alfalfa
May 07, 2007
European Patent Office Revokes Monsanto´s Species Patent On GE Soy Beans
May 03, 2007
Cancer Fear Over Electric Blanket
April 26, 2007
Toxic Fertilizer linked to Mad Cow Disease?
April 25, 2007
Water fluoridation debate: The Canadian Dental Association Insists It Prevents Tooth Decay.
March 18, 2007
Contrary to the Rhetoric Water Fluoridation Damages Teeth & Health
March 15, 2007
Water Fluoridation Causes Cancer & Increases Tumor Growth Rate By 25%
March 12, 2007
Health Effects Of Electromagnetic Fields In Housing, Schools And Offices
January 25, 2007
Inconvenient Facts About Climate Change (Global Warming)
January 22, 2007
EPA Closes Its Libraries, Destroys Documents
January 15, 2007
More Cell Phone Not Dangerous Industry Spin
December 18, 2006
Non GM status Of Rice Threatened
December 11, 2006
Why Genetically Modifying (GM) Food Products Are A No No
December 10, 2006
Ask Wal-Mart to Stop Selling Fluoride "Nursery Water" to Infants
December 04, 2006
Perchlorate: More Chemical Contaminants In Food (Thyroid)
October 17, 2006
Health Impact From Electromagnetic Radiation & Politics
October 16, 2006
Dr. David Kennedy On The Fluoride Myth
October 05, 2006
Corruption At Harvard - Re: Fluoride
September 17, 2006
Harvard Fluoride Cancer Scandal
August 27, 2006
Addicted To Fluoridation Despite Links On Cancer And Depression
July 27, 2006
VERY IMPORTANT ACTION ALERT: Say No to Fluoride Pesticides on Food!
July 26, 2006
Fluoridation for Montreal?
July 06, 2006
Global Warming - An Inconvenient Truth
July 02, 2006
Survey Finds Remarkable Cancer Cluster Near Nuclear Power Station - Cancer Institutes Ignore Risks
June 21, 2006
Excellent Interview On Depleted Uranium & ABANDONMENT Of Soldiers
June 15, 2006
Chemical-free Gardening
June 14, 2006
Pesticide-free Lawn Care
June 13, 2006
Government Hypocrites on Pesticides & Children's Health
June 07, 2006
The Pesticide Debate: Property Rights Vs. Public Health
June 04, 2006
EPA Scientists Protest Pending Pesticide Approvals
May 26, 2006
Notes to the ETC Pesticide meeting (2006/05/24)
May 14, 2006
Pesticide Permit Application - Kluckwan Aerial Spraying +
May 08, 2006
100 Mile Diet - Local Food Recipe For Health
May 07, 2006
12 Reasons To Reject Fluoridation!
April 03, 2006
Fluoride Levels Too High - National Academies (What the Press Release Did Not Mention)
March 29, 2006
To All Anti-Public Water Fluoridationists In Canada
March 28, 2006
Terminator Corporations' Suicide Seeds
February 27, 2006
Breast Cancer And Radio Frequency Exposure
January 22, 2006
Will N.M. Be First State To Ban Aspartame?
December 29, 2005
DuPont Pays Heavy Price For Teflon Cover-Up
December 14, 2005
Communities In Bloom Goes Environmentally To The Dark Side
December 07, 2005
Sunlight, Lighting And Your Health (Dangers Of Fluorescent Lighting)
December 06, 2005
Environmental Disease
November 14, 2005
The Drug Pushers In Lab Coats
November 12, 2005
Soy No Health Panacea but a Risk - Does Not Prevent Cancer Etc.
October 25, 2005
Call For Moratorium On Water Fluoridation
August 30, 2005
Fluoride-Cancer Study Cover Up
August 17, 2005
Reducing Dioxin In Our Foods
July 21, 2005
URGENT CALL OUT! Massacre In Paraguay
June 27, 2005
Fluoride To Make Prisoners 'stupid & Docile
May 17, 2005
Fighting Globalism with Common Law
May 03, 2005
Grow Your Own Mineralized Organic Super Foods
April 21, 2005
Fluoride and Aggression
March 30, 2005
Children's Cancer And Pesticides
March 21, 2005
Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) Shenanigans Re: 2,4-D Herbicide
March 07, 2005
GRAVE Cell Phone Dangers Revealed...
February 15, 2005
More Monsanto Shenanigans
January 13, 2005
Autism-Mercury Defence Restored by Nutritional Interventions
January 04, 2005
PTFE and PFOA (Perfluorooctanoic Acid) - Teflon
December 14, 2004
EPA Will Use Poor Kids as Guinea Pigs to Test Toxic Chemicals
November 16, 2004
Legal Action On Medical Problems Caused By Soy - Dioxin
November 04, 2004
More Health Canada Shenanigans To Squelch Competition
October 07, 2004
Fluoride In Our Water: Is It Helpful Or Harmful?
August 05, 2004
Food, Not Fluoride, Reduces Cavities
July 15, 2004
Pesticides Contamination of Colas
June 28, 2004
Silent Spring Revisited
June 10, 2004
Spin Doctoring: Toxins - Fluoride
June 09, 2004
Fluoridation Revisited
June 01, 2004
Fluoridation: A Violation of Medical Ethics and Human Right
May 22, 2004
A precautionary tale - US big business is furious
May 20, 2004
Questions For Water Fluoridation
May 12, 2004
Experts challenge Water Fluoridation
May 07, 2004
Spray Coalition NYC meeting
May 06, 2004
GM foods Marketing Tricks
April 30, 2004
Pesticides too harmful to use in any form, doctors warn
April 29, 2004
Grains and Disease
April 28, 2004
Give Them enough Rope and They'll Hang Themselves
April 22, 2004
RoundUp Ready Grass (GE)
January 12, 2004
Response to 'expert' views on pesticides & BSE
January 09, 2004
In Canada fuel still has toxic manganese added
January 08, 2004
Re: Mad Cow disease & pesticides (Organophosphate)
January 07, 2004
Insecticide Causes Mad Cow Disease?
January 02, 2004
FLUORIDE POLLS:
November 12, 2003
DMSO-The King Antioxidant
November 11, 2003
Notes on Hulda Clark-2003 Rife Conf.
October 28, 2003
Pesticide Poisoning Inside the Home
October 27, 2003
E.U. Waters Down Chemical Safety Testing Plan
October 25, 2003
Dr John Lee
October 23, 2003
Pesticides: a grave oversight
October 16, 2003
Vote No for Fluoridation
September 18, 2003
Living with the Fluid Genome
September 12, 2003
Landmark case against Navy sonar, we did it!
August 28, 2003
Bush deliberately lied about NYC air quality
August 28, 2003
POPs and the food industry
August 17, 2003
Indus Abuse - Loosing our Protections
August 11, 2003
San Francisco enacts Precautionary Principal
August 09, 2003
Fluoride - Please Vote
July 03, 2003
EVIDENCE OF FRAUD IN THE MATTER OF WATER FLUORIDATION
June 21, 2003
Hidden Sources of Fluoride - Pesticides
June 18, 2003
LOST TOURIST DOLLARS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS!
June 14, 2003
Debunking The "So Called" Fluoride "Experts"
June 12, 2003
Fluoridation of City of London Water - Concern
June 07, 2003
|
|
|

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
These articles are brought to you strictly for educational and informational purposes.
Be sure to consult your health practitioner of choice prior to any specific use of any of the non drug device or food based medicinal products referenced herein.
The Ads are not a an endorsement of the webmasters or writers on this site
and are simply a means to facilitate our ability bring you more information
not generally available via mainstream media. You are encouraged to take
matters in your own hands with the tools and ideas provided on this site and
elsewhere.
|