Save the environment
November 27, 2009
Further to: Fluoride - Final Submissions Due Fri., Nov. 27, 2009
These comments were sent to:
CDW Secretariat <water_eau@hc-sc.gc.ca> [CDW = Federal-Provincial-Territorial Committee on Drinking Water, authors of report]
Satish Deshpande <Satish.deshpande@ontario.ca> [Ontario Ministry of Environment, Department of Drinking Water Standards]
Minister, MOE <minister.moe@ontario.ca> [Ontario Ministry of Environment]
Environmental Commissioner of Ontario <commissioner@eco.on.ca>
For over 60 years we have been forced and subjected to water fluoridation without supportable scientific evidence on the efficacy of this substance. Now here again is - the total regurgitation of the same junk science*. It is abundantly clear that the panel for this Health Canada review was chosen specifically to continue this disgraceful tradition by deliberately cherry picking data to support a predetermined outcome!
*See also:
http://fluoridealert.org/re/canada.report.response.clinch.pdf
http://fluoridealert.org/re/canada.report.omissions.clinch.pdf
http://fluoridealert.org/re/connett.canada.11-11.09.pdf
Given the abundance of excellent science on Fluoride toxicity, it boggles the mind that this, supposed learned, panel could over look the following:
It is common sense, in that, we should not medicate anyone unless the dose is appropriate to the patient. Hence mass fluoride medication cannot be the same for a thirsty diabetic with comprised kidneys, a 3-year-old toddler and a 35-year-old construction worker. All should require different amounts of medication and not be subject to the same tolerances of this (or any) medication.
Clearly this dosage responsibility lies with each individual and her/his practitioner to determine for themselves.
How could this panel, of so called experts claim, such differing dosages are safe for all?
The real concerns of the community namely: the collateral damage such as, "impairments to the liver, kidney, brain, bones, pineal gland, thyroid, and yes - even teeth** (these too are clearly dependent on dosage and have severe effects on those with compromised nutrition, health and/or immune systems) are summarily ignored.
These major health impairments continue to trump the paltry, if not outright questionable, benefits to teeth so why are these not properly addressed in the review?
** They tell us that molted teeth from fluoridation of water is just a cosmetic effect. When in fact this is a proof positive sign of bone damage. In the British Medical Journal (B.M.J.), October 7, 2000 it is reported that 48% of children who live in fluoridated communities have developed dental fluorosis (damaged bone) due to fluoride overdose. Now then, if the bone is damaged how are you going to get fewer cavities? This demonstrates that ingesting of fluoridated water to reduce tooth decay is clearly a myth.
What expertize did this panel have on Fluoride's toxicity let alone on the untested waste substance hydrofluorosilcic acid (used to fluoridate) that contains variable quantities of arsenic, lead among other toxic residues?
We are not allowed to adulterate our foods with any amount of lead, arsenic etc. The panel failed to show, why such adulteration of water can be an exception?
While Health Canada continues to panic about lead, is this panel not aware that Fluoride is more toxic than lead?
If yes, than why does it, or anyone, want to continue to put such toxic substances in our water?
Continue reading "Comments on: "Fluoride in Drinking Water""
posted by Chris Gupta on Friday November 27 2009
Permalink
| No comments
| No trackbacks
Trackback link: http://communicationagents.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.r484.cgi/2509
November 24, 2009
Final submissions to the Canadian Drinking Water Secretariat (water_eau@hc-sc.gc.ca) are due this Friday, November 27, 2009. Please consider submitting a response to this document.
The well-known requirements of science are not sufficiently fulfilled in this document:
- omission of citations for claims, (e.g., conflicting claims in the English and French translations had no citation to verify which claim was correct);
- omissions of research which do not support conclusions, including research by panel members selected to do this review;
- a review panel was chosen with conflicts of interest, and who demonstrate a lack of expertise in artificial water fluoridation;
- misrepresentation the National Research Council Review 2006;
- use of a double standard for claims of benefits and claims of harm whereby poor quality science demonstrating efficacy is accepted uncritically whereas claims of harm are dismissed if the evidence is not of the highest quality.
Any of the following peer-reviewed responses to the CDW secretariat are available for you to submit in whole or in part.
Carole Clinch
(a) letter: http://fluoridealert.org/re/canada.report.letter.clinch.pdf
(b) response: http://fluoridealert.org/re/canada.report.response.clinch.pdf
(c) omissions: http://fluoridealert.org/re/canada.report.omissions.clinch.pdf
Paul Connett
response: http://fluoridealert.org/re/connett.canada.11-11.09.pdf
- EMAIL to:
- CDW Secretariat <water_eau@hc-sc.gc.ca> [CDW = Federal-Provincial-Territorial Committee on Drinking Water, authors of report]
- Satish Deshpande <Satish.deshpande@ontario.ca> [Ontario Ministry of Environment, Department of Drinking Water Standards]
- Minister, MOE <minister.moe@ontario.ca> [Ontario Ministry of Environment]
- Environmental Commissioner of Ontario <commissioner@eco.on.ca>
Thank you,
Carole Clinch, BA, BPHE
Research Coordinator, People for Safe Drinking Water
posted by Chris Gupta on Tuesday November 24 2009
Permalink
| No comments
| No trackbacks
Trackback link: http://communicationagents.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.r484.cgi/2508
October 26, 2009
The following brochures have been made by "People for Safe Drinking Water" to respond to half truths and blatant misinformation.
Brochures
CAPE Fluoridation statement
Great Lakes United (GLU) position
3 NRC 2006 Review Committee members:
Dr. Limeback 2009 Position Statement
Dr. Isaacson 2009 Position Statement
Dr. Thiessen Issues for Consideration
Environmental Effects
Canadian Statement on Artificial Water Fluoridation
Fact Sheet for First Nations
Fluoride in Foods and Beverages
Health Effects
Fluoride and Cancer
Continue reading "People for Safe Drinking Water"
posted by Chris Gupta on Monday October 26 2009
updated on Sunday February 7 2010
Permalink
| Comments (1)
| No trackbacks
Trackback link: http://communicationagents.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.r484.cgi/2501
June 15, 2009
Further to: Water Fluoridation Causes Cancer & Increases Tumor Growth Rate By 25% here is finally recognition of the toxicity of Fluoride salts. This is clearly precedent-setting following the news release below is the landmark decision of the European Court on the regulation of 'functional drinks' with regard to the practice of water fluoridation.
These are major decisions! This convergence of real science, as apposed to industry junk science, will make fluoride industry governmental and dental (mental) shills squirm.... As usual the mainstream Media is mum on the subject!
Please circulate this far and wide along with some excellent brochures from "People for Safe Drinking Water". This is immanently doable and undoubtedly one of the best ways to improve our health while concurrently removing toxins from the environment to boot! We need to create awareness to counter the mainstream propaganda and force the so called experts to stop damaging our health and environment by demanding them to simply stop deliberately polluting our water....
Chris Gupta
----------------------
Hi
Attached is a news release regarding the recent, unanimous and important decision by the state of California Environmental Protection Agency to consider mandating public warnings that fluoride and its salts, used in artificial water fluoridation, is a human carcinogen.
Also attached is a submission by Dr. Kathleen Thiessen, co-author of the US National Research Council 2006 Review of Fluorides in Drinking Water to the California EPA's Office of Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA).
Carole
Research Coordinator - People for Safe Drinking Water
News Release Copy
Human and Animal Cancer Evidence Prompts Review of Fluoride
California EPA Committee Designates Fluoride as Priority for Review for Public Warnings about Risk of Cancer to Consumers
Continue reading "Finally US EPA & Europe Recognize Toxicity of Fluoride"
posted by Chris Gupta on Monday June 15 2009
Permalink
| No comments
| No trackbacks
Trackback link: http://communicationagents.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.r484.cgi/2488
Comments on: "Fluoride in Drinking Water"
November 27, 2009
Fluoride - Final Submissions Due Fri., Nov. 27, 2009
November 24, 2009
People for Safe Drinking Water
October 26, 2009
Finally US EPA & Europe Recognize Toxicity of Fluoride
June 15, 2009
Elections 2008: Restoring the Health of the Nation
October 01, 2008
GM Potatoes
September 06, 2008
Re: Council Of Canadians Policy On Bottled Water Ban
August 19, 2008
Paradox Of Searching For A Cancer Cure - Why Eat Organic?
August 12, 2008
Fluoride's Impact on Brain - Focus of Two Conferences
August 04, 2008
Fundamental Change In Farming? IAATD UN Report
June 08, 2008
Bills C-51 & C-52 Example letters
May 28, 2008
GE Labelling - Government Adamant To Pass Bills C-51 & C-52
May 25, 2008
Corrupt to the Core - Memoirs of a Health Canada Scientist - Bill 517: GE Labeling
April 14, 2008
Water Treatment With Silcofluorides And Lead Toxicity
October 16, 2007
Professionals' Statement Calling For End To To Fluoridation
July 05, 2007
Sustainable Seafood
June 21, 2007
Genetically Engineered (GE) Insects Soon In Canada?
May 14, 2007
No ORGANIC Bee losses - Bees Immune Systems Damaged
May 08, 2007
Toxic Fertilizer linked to Mad Cow Disease?
April 25, 2007
Inconvenient Facts About Climate Change (Global Warming)
January 22, 2007
If You Value Your Food Say No To Genetic Modification
January 14, 2007
The Machinations Of The New World Order - The Farmer
October 11, 2006
Dr. David Kennedy On The Fluoride Myth
October 05, 2006
Corruption At Harvard - Re: Fluoride
September 17, 2006
Harvard Fluoride Cancer Scandal
August 27, 2006
VERY IMPORTANT ACTION ALERT: Say No to Fluoride Pesticides on Food!
July 26, 2006
Global Warming - An Inconvenient Truth
July 02, 2006
Survey Finds Remarkable Cancer Cluster Near Nuclear Power Station - Cancer Institutes Ignore Risks
June 21, 2006
Chemical-free Gardening
June 14, 2006
Pesticide-free Lawn Care
June 13, 2006
Government Hypocrites on Pesticides & Children's Health
June 07, 2006
100 Mile Diet - Local Food Recipe For Health
May 07, 2006
Solar Power Using An Alloy Film Better Than Silicon
February 21, 2006
Communities In Bloom Goes Environmentally To The Dark Side
December 07, 2005
Battery Recharges in Only One Minute
April 01, 2005
Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) Shenanigans Re: 2,4-D Herbicide
March 07, 2005
CleverKeys - A Great Educational Aid
September 01, 2004
Silent Spring Revisited
June 10, 2004
Questions For Water Fluoridation
May 12, 2004
Spray Coalition NYC meeting
May 06, 2004
Pesticides too harmful to use in any form, doctors warn
April 29, 2004
Beehive Politics
November 26, 2003
Pesticide Poisoning Inside the Home
October 27, 2003
San Francisco enacts Precautionary Principal
August 09, 2003
Raw Milk: How Safe Is It?
July 05, 2003
Software recommendation to save the environment.
June 24, 2003
|
|
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
These articles are brought to you strictly for educational and informational purposes.
Be sure to consult your health practitioner of choice prior to any specific use of any of the non drug device or food based medicinal products referenced herein.
The Ads are not a an endorsement of the webmasters or writers on this site
and are simply a means to facilitate our ability bring you more information
not generally available via mainstream media. You are encouraged to take
matters in your own hands with the tools and ideas provided on this site and
elsewhere.
|
