Tom Atlee Radio Interview May 1, 2005
CategoriesI'll be interviewed on Oasis Forum, WKNH 91.3FM, Keene, NH, May 1, 7-8 pm EST. Their blurb on it says "Tom Atlee, founder of the Co-Intelligence Institute, and author of The Tao of Democracy, will speak about a new vision of politics and governance that can simultaneously address our unprecedented social problems and build a society that works for all." If you're interested and miss it, they keep an archive.
The interviewer, John-Michael Dumais, asked for some talking points. I suspect I will want to speak about the following:
- The Citizens Assembly - British Columbia, Canada, just finished a remarkable exercise in empowered citizen deliberation which did a thorough review of alternative voting systems and designed a brilliant one for British Columbia, which will be voted on by the population May 2005 (the month of my interview). This is an example of tapping into the collective intelligence of citizens thinking and talking together in a kind of forum I call citizen deliberative councils. This approach could be used widely to deal with public issues and even evaluate candidates.
- The citizen deliberative council approach represents a very different kind of democracy than we are used to. Most democratic activity involves partisans fighting to win battles for their side, their proposal, their candidate, their position. This is adversarial politics, and will probably always be with us. But a surprising number of issues and conflicts can be dealt with through creative dialogue and deliberation involving a full spectrum of perspective, coming up with approaches that work well for the vast majority of people involved. Doing that as often as possible creates a more holistic politics -- tapping into the wisdom of the whole society for the benefit of the whole society.
- Majoritarianism is booby-trapped in that it pushes political actors towards polarized for/against positions, rather than encouraging an open-ended exploration of the problem or issue they all face. This oversimplifies what the options and trade-offs are, reducing our ability to be smart and wise together (collectively intelligent). While majoritarianism is far better than a dictatorship, we need to acknowledge its dark side. And we need to build up our ability to use more holistic approaches to democracy.
- Many of our greatest 21st century challenges are unprecedented. Addressing them will require that we face their very real complexity, that we involve many many more people and stakeholders in solving them, and that we remain flexible, because we can never be sure how our solutions will fare in the real world. We have to be able to review what is happening, as whole communities and societies, over and over, and to change course when necessary. And we need to think long term, think systemically, see the interconnections, and become aware that we are co-creating what happens next, no matter what we do. Finally, we need to be more humble, recognizing our limitations. (When we have the ability to profoundly effect the whole planet, our arrogance can destroy us. Infinite pride cometh before an infinite fall.) Doing all this will be much easier with more holistic forms of democracy. If we succeed in building such democracies, we will have "wisdom cultures" remarkably different from (and better than) the cultures we live in now.
- A more holistic form of self-governance - which we need just to survive as a civilization - also can be viewed as the next step in our evolution -- expanding our intelligence to embrace the whole, and becoming able to consciously, responsibly co-evolve with each other and nature.
posted by Tom Atlee on Thursday April 14 2005
updated on Saturday September 24 2005URL of this article:
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/tom_atlee/2005/04/14/tom_atlee_radio_interview_may_1_2005.htm
Related ArticlesProtect Sources or Not? - More Complex than It Seems
Should the media and the legal system protect unethical powerholders who illegally leak information as part of their power manipulations? If they are protected, doesn't that degrade democracy? If they are exposed, wouldn't that make ethical whistleblowers less likely to leak vital information to the public, also degrading democracy? The answers to these questions play out differently in a polarized adversarial political environment and in a culture of dialogue... [read more]
July 16, 2005 - Tom AtleeCitizens Juries to Choose Supreme Court Justices?!
My July 6 Washington Post headlines email contains this item: "Are a Nominee's Views Fair Game?": "White House and Senate Democrats headed toward a collision yesterday over the role ideology should play in the selection of the next Supreme Court justice, outlining a key conflict that could define the nomination battle over a successor to Justice Sandra Day O'Connor." There's more than meets the eye here...... [read more]
July 06, 2005 - Tom AtleeA Spectrum of Politics and Governance Grounded in Empowered Citizen Dialogue and Deliberation
All forms of dialogue and deliberation serve our evolution into a culture of dialogue. Part of that evolution is the increased legitimacy and empowerment of forms that call forth more of society's collective intelligence and wisdom. As new forms of dialogue and deliberation demonstrate their effectiveness, they can be increasingly trusted by citzens and officials, and thus can (and should) become increasingly embedded in the institutions of social policy-making.... [read more]
July 04, 2005 - Tom Atlee
 |
||
|
Diversity is possibility waiting to be born. So how can we use our differences most creatively? |
|
|
||
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
These articles are brought to you strictly for educational and informational purposes. Be sure to consult your health practitioner of choice before utilizing any of the information to cure or mitigate disease. Any copyrighted material cited is used strictly in a non commercial way and in accordance with the "fair use" doctrine.
