Big Pharma Uses UN To Deny Freedom To Use Dietary Supplements
Categories..."The FDA, like all federal agencies, ultimately uses its regulatory powers in political ways. Certain industries and companies are rewarded, and others are punished. No regulatory agency is immune from politics, which is why the FDA should not be trusted with power over our intimate health care decisions."...
This short post more or less gets to the nub of the situation
Chris Gupta
-----------------------Dietary Supplements and Health Freedom
April 25, 2005
Millions of Americans take dietary supplements every day, and the numbers are growing as the Baby Boom generation ages. More and more Americans understandably are frustrated with our government-controlled health care system. They have concluded that vitamins, minerals, and other supplements might help them stay healthy and less dependent on the system. They use supplements because they can buy them freely at stores and research them freely on the internet, without government interference in the form of doctors, prescriptions, HMOs, and licenses. In other words, they use supplements because they are largely free to make their own choices, in stark contrast to the conventional medical system.
But we live in an era of unbridled government regulation of both our personal lives and the economy, and Food and Drug administration bureaucrats burn to regulate supplements in the same manner as prescription drugs.
The health nannies insist that many dietary supplements are untested and unproven, and therefore dangerous. But the track record for FDA-approved drugs hardly inspires confidence. In fact, far more Americans have died using approved pharmaceuticals than supplements. Not every dietary supplement performs as claimed, but neither does every FDA drug.
The FDA simply gives people a false sense of security, while crowding out private watchdog groups that might provide truly disinterested consumer information. It fosters a complacent attitude and a lack of personal responsibility among people who assume a government stamp of approval means a drug must be safe, and that they need not study a drug before taking it.
The FDA, like all federal agencies, ultimately uses its regulatory powers in political ways. Certain industries and companies are rewarded, and others are punished. No regulatory agency is immune from politics, which is why the FDA should not be trusted with power over our intimate health care decisions.
The real issue is not whether supplements really work, or whether FDA drugs really are safe. The real issue is: Who decides, the individual or the state? This is the central question in almost every political issue. In free societies, individuals decide what medical treatments or health supplements are appropriate for them.
Over the past decade the American people have made it clear they do not want the federal government to interfere with their access to dietary supplements. In 1994, Congress bowed to overwhelming public pressure and passed the Dietary Supplements and Health and Education Act, which liberalized the rules regarding the regulation of dietary supplements. Congressional offices received a record number of comments in favor of the Act, which demonstrates how strongly Americans feel about health freedom.
The FDA simply has thumbed its nose at Congress and ignored the new rules in many instances, by attempting to suppress information about health supplements. But in 1999 a federal appellate court affirmed that the American people have a First Amendment right to such information without interference from the FDA. However, members of Congress have had to intervene with the FDA on several occasions to ensure that they followed the court order.
My regular listeners already know about another looming threat to dietary supplement freedom. The Codex Alimentarius Commission, an offshoot of the United Nations, is working to harmonize food and supplement rules between all nations of the world. Under Codex rules, even basic vitamins and minerals will require a doctors prescription. As Europe moves ever closer to adopting Codex standards, it becomes more likely that the World Trade Organization will attempt to force those standards on the United States. This is yet another example of how the WTO threatens American sovereignty. By cooperating with Codex, the FDA is blatantly ignoring the will of Congress and the American people.
posted by Chris Gupta on Monday May 2 2005
updated on Saturday September 24 2005URL of this article:
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/2005/05/02/big_pharma_uses_un_to_deny_freedom_to_use_dietary_supplements.htm
Related ArticlesMore Guidelines (à la Regulations) to Squelch Competition
What a bunch of malarkey, considering that alternate medicines are, in the main, safer than foods, this agency is pretending to look after our health interests when in reality they are simply carrying out the pharma agenda. A rogue authority whose 3rd world vaccine budgets are larger than procuring water for those countries. Surely you don't think that they are looking after our concerns do you??? As usual this is... [read more]
June 30, 2004 - Chris GuptaLIFE UNDER CODEX - Update
Good points Chris, however, I think the representatives of the people get usurped to do the cartels' biding... This is what makes our so called democracies such a shame. How can someone I elected represent me if several others with apposing views have also elected the same individual? Not only do the minorities get trumped in such a system but the majority are also trumped by the prostituted representatives. Since... [read more]
January 28, 2005 - Chris GuptaFew Problems Occur Mixing Supplements & Drugs
Just like there are a few, and I mean few (even less than foods we ingest), adverse reactions with natural health products, now the much bandied scare tactic of mixing supplements and drugs is also rapidly hitting the dust. Of course this won't stop the propaganda machine in continuing to discredit the most innocuous and effective health remedies. Meanwhile, they still don't have much information, and couldn't careless about highly... [read more]
March 25, 2004 - Chris GuptaRegulatory Abuse
..."As far as public health is concerned the available evidence is abundantly clear. Since less than 1% of dietary supplements have been found to constitute any significant health hazard there is absolutely no justification for additional safety based regulatory controls of 99% of available dietary supplements. Pharmaceutical drugs on the other hand continue to cause a huge number of adverse reactions and fatalities. According to abundant scientific evidence therefore, urgent... [read more]
December 15, 2003 - Chris GuptaThe Medical Mafia rules:
OK to use and promote untested and toxic drugs and medical procedures ....but Not OK for generally safe and efficacious natural foods and/or vitamins! ..."Only 6% of drug advertising material is supported by evidence... ...The article lists several examples of misrepresentation: medical guidelines from scientific societies are misquoted or changed, the side effects of drugs are minimised, groups of patient are wrongly defined, study results are suppressed, treatment effects are... [read more]
March 15, 2004 - Chris Gupta
