"Nutrient logic dictates that humans cannot thrive without key nutrients, and that today's health threats are simply the result of gaping nutrient deficiencies. In contrast to a focus on choking down symptom masking drugs, nutrient logic addresses the cause and conquers illness by filling the corresponding deficiency. The process is as simple and logical as resurrecting a dying, sun-deprived plant with sun exposure and water. A mountain of scientific evidence supports this logic if you really need proof. As a pharmaceutical chemist, I've been studying it for more than twenty years. And the evidence has always proven that nutrient logic can improve people's health while saving them money."
"Nutrient logic isn't alternative medicine. It's scientifically proven, evidence-based medicine supported by historical data as well as today's most advanced techniques of medicinal chemistry...." As usual the book sites full references to substantiate this.
This book does not discuss health at the "symptom level." but is based on body's most fundamental level, the cell. This gives "a vantage point by highlighting the biological mechanisms underlying the cause of symptoms before they develop. Monitoring cell function offers insight into our "health trajectory." That's far better than relying on shoddy studies bought and paid for by Big Pharma that simply study symptoms and the statistical associations that come with them.
Like mapping the flight path of an asteroid and predicting its location years from now, monitoring cellular function helps identify big health problems years or even decades before they start."
Shane Ellison's book cuts to the core and treads where few if any have gone. It teaches simple lifestyle changes along with navigation skills needed to overcome the hype from both the mainstream and alternative health self serving camps.
Third Reading of Bill C-6 is scheduled for next week's Senate Hearing. Please keep the letters going we need to delay the passing of C-6. The more we delay the better our chances of killing this bill. See example letters below
"Of course we all want our country to be safe from hazardous products. But let's not get suckered into believing that Health Canada's radical departure from our constitutional form of government is the only way to do it. There are simpler ways to accomplish Health Canada's professed objectives without trampling on our individual rights. We want consumers to be safe - without making business owners unsafe.
C-6 is the most protested piece of legislation in our entire 142-year history. Over 100,000 letters/faxes/emails received by senators and MPs attest to this fact. Listen to the people. We don't want legislation that violates our rights, especially when there are viable options which respect those rights.
Health Canada isn't telling the whole story. Yes, hazardous products do find their way into Canada. Yes, we need ways of minimizing these hazards. What Health Canada neglects to mention is that the Hazardous Products Act is working just fine. Voluntary recalls are up this year over last. What business person in his right mind isn't going to recall a dangerous product when asked to? Killing or injuring your customers isn't good for business.
Health Canada claims that they need mandatory recalls in order to do their job of protecting the public. If so, there is an incredibly simple solution: update the Hazardous Products Act to include mandatory recalls." DR
To send your letter please read the following and use a few introductory notes to the attachment (titled in red) below.
Cc: lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca, HarpeS@parl.gc.ca, "'Day, Joseph A.'" <DAYJA@sen.parl.gc.ca>, mccoye@sen.parl.gc.ca,
Dear Recently Appointed Senators:
You are able to vote independently on Bill C-6. Please do. It will be much better for Canadians if you vote your conscience rather than follow the party lines which may have inadvertently led us to the brink of a legislative disaster.
Continue reading "C-6 = Legislative Disaster"
CDW Secretariat <water_eau@hc-sc.gc.ca> [CDW = Federal-Provincial-Territorial Committee on Drinking Water, authors of report] Satish Deshpande <Satish.deshpande@ontario.ca> [Ontario Ministry of Environment, Department of Drinking Water Standards] Minister, MOE <minister.moe@ontario.ca> [Ontario Ministry of Environment] Environmental Commissioner of Ontario <commissioner@eco.on.ca>
For over 60 years we have been forced and subjected to water fluoridation without supportable scientific evidence on the efficacy of this substance. Now here again is - the total regurgitation of the same junk science*. It is abundantly clear that the panel for this Health Canada review was chosen specifically to continue this disgraceful tradition by deliberately cherry picking data to support a predetermined outcome!
Given the abundance of excellent science on Fluoride toxicity, it boggles the mind that this, supposed learned, panel could over look the following:
It is common sense, in that, we should not medicate anyone unless the dose is appropriate to the patient. Hence mass fluoride medication cannot be the same for a thirsty diabetic with comprised kidneys, a 3-year-old toddler and a 35-year-old construction worker. All should require different amounts of medication and not be subject to the same tolerances of this (or any) medication.
Clearly this dosage responsibility lies with each individual and her/his practitioner to determine for themselves.
How could this panel, of so called experts claim, such differing dosages are safe for all?
The real concerns of the community namely: the collateral damage such as, "impairments to the liver, kidney, brain, bones, pineal gland, thyroid, and yes - even teeth** (these too are clearly dependent on dosage and have severe effects on those with compromised nutrition, health and/or immune systems) are summarily ignored.
** They tell us that molted teeth from fluoridation of water is just a cosmetic effect. When in fact this is a proof positive sign of bone damage. In the British Medical Journal (B.M.J.), October 7, 2000 it is reported that 48% of children who live in fluoridated communities have developed dental fluorosis (damaged bone) due to fluoride overdose. Now then, if the bone is damaged how are you going to get fewer cavities? This demonstrates that ingesting of fluoridated water to reduce tooth decay is clearly a myth.
What expertize did this panel have on Fluoride's toxicity let alone on the untested waste substance hydrofluorosilcic acid (used to fluoridate) that contains variable quantities of arsenic, lead among other toxic residues?
We are not allowed to adulterate our foods with any amount of lead, arsenic etc. The panel failed to show, why such adulteration of water can be an exception?
Final submissions to the Canadian Drinking Water Secretariat (water_eau@hc-sc.gc.ca) are due this Friday, November 27, 2009. Please consider submitting a response to this document.
The well-known requirements of science are not sufficiently fulfilledin this document:
omission of citations for claims, (e.g., conflicting claims in the English and French translations had no citation to verify which claim was correct);
omissions of research which do not support conclusions, including research by panel members selected to do this review;
a review panel was chosen with conflicts of interest, and who demonstrate a lack of expertise in artificial water fluoridation;
misrepresentation the National Research Council Review 2006;
use of a double standard for claims of benefits and claims of harm whereby poor quality science demonstrating efficacy is accepted uncritically whereas claims of harm are dismissed if the evidence is not of the highest quality.
Any of the following peer-reviewed responses to the CDW secretariat are available for you to submit in whole or in part.
Here yet again is the classic strategy used over and over to deal with awkward issues pertaining to witnesses, scientific evidence etc. that comes in the way of predetermined policy in favour of the industry. This strategy is currently being used not only for Bill C-6 but also such issues as water fluoridation (more on this in another post) and vaccination among others...
The government regulatory agencies "are essentially public relations and diversionary arrangements to control and placate the masses. Contrary to perceptions, regulatory bodies are essential to protect the industry, consumer protection is incidental! Regulations favourable to industry are created in the name of health and safety such as testing their wares on animals etc. which often have no relations to human health and safety. Once passed the companies are then off the hook, the tax payer and the injured party/s are left holding the bag for subsequent problems and/or complications.... Agencies themselves, by design of course, are unaccountable and serve as a shield for the industry."
We need to expose these shenanigans and bring then to the attention of the Senate and ask for accountability of these actions....
Chris Gupta
--------------------
Hello Team,
Interesting times – Senate is not going to allow David and I to witness. I suspect that “THEY” are afraid of the uncontrollable on record evidence opposing Bill C-6.
See David’s excellent comments below.
Thanks.
TrueMan
------------------------
Please pass on to all who received rejection letters:
Senator Joseph Day is the official critic of Bill C-6 and thus could be our most important ally in the senate. He is most concerned that (a) the Social Affairs Committee was not given a list of those witnesses who have been excluded from testifying, (b) all of the witnesses thus far have discussed only policy considerations, and (c) no one has yet challenged the deeper issue of C-6’s unconstitutionality.
Clink on the following picture to hear a short (10 excerpt - part 2 below) from the full 46 minute "Power to the People" lecture as a primer to the questions and text below:
"Focus entirely on the constitutional and charter violations of C-6. Do NOT mention natural health products in any way, shape or form. If you do, you will likely be dismissed with a reply that C-6 specifically exempts NHPs. This is a bogus response. Schedule 1 of C-6 includes foods, drugs, cosmetics, devices and explosive. Schedule 1 can be revised at any time to include NHPs. Further, the Health Minister has another bill in the wings that specifically targets NHPs. If C-6 passes, then our industry is next, no matter what they say." DR
Following are links to the full lecture that will give you a good grounding how our government operates it is not what you think! This is a must listen. I have also uploaded this 46 minute lecture as a mp3 file here for the convenience for those who should like to hear this on the go. Unfortunately the first minute or so is very loud but the remainder is fine.
Extracted from: "Conférence pour la Liberté de Choix en Santé where you can hear other excellent speakers as well. There maybe both French and English translations on the above link too?
*Apparently, in view of the following deliberations "some Senators on the Committee reviewing Bill C-6 would be so afraid of my witness appearance that they are not only blocking me or David from appearing, but had arranged for a so-called “Consumer Advocate” that I do not even know to directly attack me in his limited 10 minute presentation." TT
Here yet again is another vested interest group masquerading as an environmental consumer group. Please read and post your own comments in the above link before they are removed.
Chris Gupta
----------------------------------
Hello FOFI GIA Freedom BeeHive Canadian Council & Network,
Please see attached part of our Canadian Coalition for Health Freedom analysis of C-6 that was handed out to MPs and Senators during my Oct 7th and 8th Ottawa trip. C-6 passed second reading on October 7th
I have updated our E-Protest online letter. Please encourage everyone to go to www.canadiancoalitionforhealthfreedom.ca and CLICK on the BIG RED STOP sign and send the new E-Protest letter to over 400 MPs and Senators. Please note that when you receive your confirmation e-mail – please ensure that the full link is used to finalize sending your E-Protest Freedom letter.
You need to call your MPs in your riding and go and meet with them to discuss your concerns.
We must unite and organize together riding by riding in order to develop enough focused PEOPLE PROTEST POWER to stop Bill C-6 and the soon to be re-introduced C-51.
We urgently need your help immediately to do the following:
Attention: The Canadian Coalition for Health Freedom GIA Freedom BeeHive Network
A tremendous victory for sanity, in a world gone crazy happened in the Canadian Senate yesterday for our Freedom Team.
The Liberal Senator Joseph Day from New Brunswick came through for the protection of the unalienable rights, freedoms and liberties of all Canadians during yesterdays resumed 2nd reading debate on one of the worst federal Canadian Bills in history. – Bill C-6. The so-called Consumer Protection Act.
Take a look at the attached risk chart and you tell your MP and Senator what we need protecting from!
Also our special thanks to another Liberal Senator, Senator Banks for adjourning the debate.
Where are the Conservatives, NDP and Bloc on these issues?
It is really encouraging that someone in power in one of the parties is prepared to slow down really bad legislation that the Clerk of the Privy Council, Deputy Minister of Justice and Health Canada bureaucrats are so relentlessly trying to force onto the unwilling Canadian People.
It was the Liberal Senator Sharon Carstair from Manitoba that adjourned the initial 2nd Reading in the Senate on June 23rd, 2009. Thank goodness.
Our Power to the People grassrootss’ E-Mail campaign is working. Senator Day reports in the minutes below and attached, over 600 e-mails have been received by each Senator. In addition our E-Protest Big Red Stop sign e-mail system on www.canadiancoalitionforhealthfreedom.ca on the top right hand side of the home page has sent the same e-mails to all 308 MPs.
RIGHT NOW WE NEED ALL OF YOU TO GO AND SEND THIS E-PROTEST E-MAIL. Click on www.canadiancoalitionforhealthfreedom.ca and on top right of home page click on the BIG RED STOP sign to send your Stop Bill C-6 e-mail to over 400 MPs and Senators.
Our GIA Freedom E-Protest system has already sent over 250,000 e-mails and we need hundreds of thousand more immediately.
The Liberal Senators have the power to stop Bill C-6 ever becoming into force.
We must also get the Joint Committee of the House and Senate called Regs in the House and Scrutiny in the Senate to give us witness days to challenge the constitutional, jurisdictional and Public interest validity of Schedule F, DIN Numbers and the Natural Health Product Regulations. None of these draconian manipulations of federal criminal empowered regulations has ever been reviewed by Parliament and the Senator.
HOW CAN BUREAUCRATS MAKE CRIMINAL OFFENSES WITHOUT LEGISLATION?
See details in letter and index of research attached.
We need your members to support our efforts to defeat Bill C-6. Please make monthly pledges now. You can give on line here.
As you can see by Senator Day’s comments our concerns are being listened to by the Liberal Senators, unlike all the MPs from all parties who allowed this terrible BIG PHARMA dream bill to get through the House of Comments.
Allowing this terrible bill through the House of Commons so quickly is one of the greatest betrayals of the MP’s God-given Political Stewardship trust that I have ever experienced since I started battling federal rogue criminal empowered regulators in 1972.
Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Martin, seconded by the Honourable Senator Ruth, for the second reading of Bill C-6, An Act respecting the safety of consumer products.
Further to: Water Fluoridation Causes Cancer & Increases Tumor Growth Rate By 25% here is finally recognition of the toxicity of Fluoride salts. This is clearly precedent-setting following the news release below is the landmark decision of the European Court on the regulation of 'functional drinks' with regard to the practice of water fluoridation.
These are major decisions! This convergence of real science, as apposed to industry junk science, will make fluoride industry governmental and dental (mental) shills squirm.... As usual the mainstream Media is mum on the subject!
Please circulate this far and wide along with some excellent brochures from "People for Safe Drinking Water". This is immanently doable and undoubtedly one of the best ways to improve our health while concurrently removing toxins from the environment to boot! We need to create awareness to counter the mainstream propaganda and force the so called experts to stop damaging our health and environment by demanding them to simply stop deliberately polluting our water....
Chris Gupta
----------------------
Hi
Attached is a news release regarding the recent, unanimous and important decision by the state of California Environmental Protection Agency to consider mandating public warnings that fluoride and its salts, used in artificial water fluoridation, is a human carcinogen.
Also attached is a submission by Dr. Kathleen Thiessen, co-author of the US National Research Council 2006 Review of Fluorides in Drinking Water to the California EPA's Office of Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA).
Carole
Research Coordinator - People for Safe Drinking Water
After Helke's "Questions To Put To Your MP" below, you will find a couple, among many, of blatant Health Canada abuses. Examples, that I suspect are systematically being escalated to get us acclimatized to the governments new mode of operation. Other examples besides those of Health Canada are:
Things have certainly changed we are no longer in a place where there is any democratic discourse. Instead, it is and I now suspect a locked shop. It is as though people are robotically walking around, in denial, business as usual. The Establishment's stance has clearly shifted from the older covert and ponderous, but with some democratic discourse, to an overt and callous but faster dealings at the expense of constituent rights to move the multinationalists' agenda.
"For a real education, here is some incredible information, in that it shows how, without full disclosure of intent, we have been maneuvered into signing our rights away...thus, conforming to the intents of those who run our government behind the scenes."...
If we let them get away with these abuses it will simply be viewed as acceptable and/or consent by inaction on the part of the people. Hence, it is imperative that we all get involved, in addition to email, faxes etc. use registered mail to your MP, Minister, etc. emails and faxes are screened by levels of Aides and often your MP does not even see these. We need to ensure that our MPs knows what is going on behind their backs and demand accountability of their lack of action to protect the electorate. So get in their face literarily! It is more effective if you go in groups to meet them. Keep at them until they do the right thing.
Chris Gupta
--------------------
Questions To Put To Your MP - What’s Wrong With Bill C-6 & Demands Explanation:
1. “For the first time in Canadian history”, lawyer Shawn Buckley explains, “Bill C-6 not only abolishes the law of trespass, but also allows warrants to be issued to search private homes without evidence of criminal wrongdoing*… in violation of Section 8 of the Charter.” What ?!
These articles are brought to you strictly for educational and informational purposes.
Be sure to consult your health practitioner of choice prior to any specific use of any of the non drug device or food based medicinal products referenced herein.
The Ads are not a an endorsement of the webmasters or writers on this site
and are simply a means to facilitate our ability bring you more information
not generally available via mainstream media. You are encouraged to take
matters in your own hands with the tools and ideas provided on this site and
elsewhere.
