Share The Wealth by Chris Gupta

Self-Sufficiency Is The Key To Empowerment And Freedom

Self-Sufficiency Is The Key To Empowerment And Freedom
June 28, 2003

Avoid fluoride to cure IBS

Categories

The following letter has appeared in the UK magazine
PROOF! What works in alternative medicine. February 2002, Vol 6, No.7, page
4.
(PROOF! is published by What Doctors Don't Tell You).

Chris Gupta

Avoid fluoride to cure IBS.

Re irritable bowel syndrome (PROOF! vol 5 no 2). I was surprised to see no
mention of avoiding fluoride, which can cause 'non ulcer dyspeptic '
complaints with symptoms similar to IBS.

Professor A.K. Susheela, a leading scientist in fluoride research and a
senior advisor to the Indian Government, has electron micrographs of the
effects of fluoride on gut cells. She says that, by avoiding fluoride, IBS
symptoms will clear in 15 days. Dental advisor Tony Lees, though sceptical,
took her advice; his symptoms cleared in 15 days.

Liz Vaughan,
Lowick Bridge, Cumbria.

 


posted by Chris Gupta on Saturday June 28 2003
updated on Saturday September 24 2005

URL of this article:
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/2003/06/28/avoid_fluoride_to_cure_ibs.htm

 


Related Articles

JUST AS THEY'RE ABOUT TO BAN 'EM
In particular please note the important link on Vitamin C and cancer treatment that I have embellished in this WDDTY archive. Chris Gupta --------------------- JUST AS THEY'RE ABOUT TO BAN 'EM, PART I: The type of vitamin C that can fight cancer There's been a lot of bad publicity of late about vitamin C as a cancer fighter, which has been remarkably timely for the European bureaucrats and their UK... [read more]
August 02, 2003 - Chris Gupta

CQ10 (coenzyme Q10) and Cancer
This supports Hulda clark's protocol on the use of CQ10 in massive quantities in her book "The Cure For All Cancers" See also: A PHYSICIANS' UPDATE ON COENZYME Q10 IN U.S. MEDICINE SUMMARY OF A RECENT PUBMED SEARCH AND OTHER MATERIALS Chris Gupta Progress on therapy of breast cancer with vitamin Q10 and the regression of metastases. Lockwood K ; Moesgaard S ; Yamamoto T ; Folkers K Over 35... [read more]
July 31, 2003 - Chris Gupta

Anti-Ageing Discoveries
Here is more proof why fresh unadulterated foods are so important, given that: "Plant hormone KINETIN delays the onset of many cellular and biochemical characteristics associated with cellular ageing of cultured human cells..." Natural sources of kinetin related cytokinins are: very high levels in coconut water/milk; all germinating seeds and growing tips etc." Of course as the note says below, if kinetin is to be marketed, it will have to... [read more]
July 26, 2003 - Chris Gupta

 


Readers' Comments


Fluoride is not in any way shape or form a cause of IBS.

The "information" posted is almost certainly grossly exaggerated and possibly even fabricated to a point.

The only research I can turn up from this individual is that a *continual overdose* of fluoride can cause gut problems.

Posted by: flux on September 23, 2003 05:49 AM

 


Flux is wrong.
I fabricated nothing and exaggerated nothing.
It can only be malicious speculation on his part.

If you have a "cosy" image of Flourides consider this
The American “Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products” (5th. Edition) rates fluoride only slightly less toxic than arsenic, and more toxic than lead!
This made it a useful rat poison.
And yet their Environmental Protection Agency permits 250 times more Fluoride than lead, in water. Is this logical?
Moreover there is a goal of zero to be achieved for the, less poisonous, lead!

If we found that lead or arsenic hardened teeth would we add them to water?
Well Fluoride is just as toxic, with scores of proven detrimental effects on the body.
Why is Britain pursuing Fluoridation when medical/expert opinion is becoming more sceptical about it, and whilst Ireland is considering reversing Fluoridation and 98% of Europe is against it?
The Fluoride used has no drug approval; in fact it is an industrial waste, from fertiliser or smelting-plant chimney-scrubbers. It contains heavy metal impurities including Arsenic, Lead and Antimony as well as Uranium 238. And it is illegal to discharge it into the environment, or dump it at sea…
A cynic might wonder if it’s put in the water supply so that each time we wash the car, or flush the toilet we conveniently tip an industrial waste into the environment in a manner that is otherwise illegal.
It was one thing for Americans to solve a toxic waste problem in this manner, but to export this idea to tea-drinking nations like Britain and Ireland was downright irresponsible.

Recent Taiwanese research, published in “Nature” magazine found huge variations in the Fluoride content of different teas. This means control of the Fluoride dose is impossible. The concentration of Fluoride in tea could be as much as 41 times the optimum to reduce dental fillings! Even this dental “optimum” is not necessarily good for our general health. If you drink tea you are probably already getting too much Fluoride, as I certainly was. But we can choose to avoid tea we cannot avoid water.

Flouride is a thyroid suppressor, formally used to treat over-active thyroid glands. There are literally hundreds of studies on the thyroid-toxicity of fluoride. Furthermore, Chlorine (which is added to our water) and mercury (which is in our teeth-fillings) are also thyroid suppressors. The aluminium in tea enhances this effect. We seem to be conducting a multi-pronged assault on the thyroids of a whole generation and many people claim that a large percentage of the population is suffering from sub-clinically low thyroid function.
Research, published in 2001, also showed that fluoride calcified the vital pineal gland in the brain with potentially far-reaching consequences.

It would seem that the only argument for Fluoridation is the dental health argument.
But even this is hotly contested. I can do no better than refer you to a paper published in The Irish Medical Journal by Dr. Don MacAuley (Dental Surgeon). He was a supporter of Fluoridation but changed his mind only after looking deeper into Fluoride at the request of some of his patients. His dental-school training had not supplied these perspectives. He outlines some of the multitudinous toxic affects of this poison. (It seems naïve to me, to assume that a substance that has profound effects on teeth and bone would have no other effects on our bodies, particularly on the digestive tract through which it passes). This would not be so alarming were it not such a powerful poison. (Please find his paper attached here:- http://www.rvi.net/~fluoride/vul.htm )
Also Re IBS/Fluoride see
http://www.npwa.freeserve.co.uk/IBS.html


Resources:

http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/html/picture_i.html

http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/html/picture_i.html
http://64.177.90.157/science/
http://64.177.90.157/science/
http://directory.google.com/Top/Society/Issues/Health/Water_Treatment/Fluoridation/?il=1

Posted by: Andrew on September 30, 2003 08:10 PM

 


12 years ago I had an accident that broke teeth. This meant no hot drinks. I was suddenly totally free of the IBS that had plagued me daily for 10 years with bloating, tummy cramps and anal mucus.
When I was better, I tested, and retested various beverages…..and it was tea, that would bring back the cramps every time.
I researched tea to discover why it might cause IBS. I noted that tea contained more fluoride than any other edible plant. I found out also that a symptom of fluoride poisoning is gut pain and remembered that Canadian researchers blamed toothpaste for IBS. So, out went the fluoride toothpaste as well as the tea! I went from daily gut pain to total cure!
Now I have had 12 years free of IBS….except for when I went to live in Feering, Essex for 9 months. The symptoms began to creep back, so I enquired of the local water supplier if they fluoridated. “No need” was the response “you have the highest natural fluoride in the country. I changed to bottled water and the IBS totally disappeared again. This may not amount to a full-blown, “double-blind, medical trial,” but it did give “blind” corroborative proof. Because I did not have, and could not have, anticipated an IBS recurrence, since the water at Feering was not “officially” fluoridated.
I pride myself on a rigorously scientific mind so I was prepared to believe that it was only MY IBS that was caused by fluoride. I remained suspicious however, because the enormous rise in IBS was “coincident” with the rise in fluoride-ingestion from water, toothpastes, pesticides, non-stick cookware and mouthwashes.
Scientific methodology means we generally only find links we are looking for. Has anyone looked for a link between TOTAL Fluoride ingestion and IBS?

Posted by: L Harley on November 28, 2003 05:07 PM

 


Flux is wrong.
I fabricated nothing and exaggerated nothing.
It can only be malicious speculation on his part.

If you have a "cosy" image of Flourides consider this
The American “Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products” (5th. Edition) rates fluoride only slightly less toxic than arsenic, and more toxic than lead!
This made it a useful rat poison.
And yet their Environmental Protection Agency permits 250 times more Fluoride than lead, in water. Is this logical?
Moreover there is a goal of zero to be achieved for the, less poisonous, lead!

If we found that lead or arsenic hardened teeth would we add them to water?
Well Fluoride is just as toxic, with scores of proven detrimental effects on the body.
Why are we pursuing Fluoridation when medical/expert opinion is becoming more sceptical about it, and whilst Ireland is considering reversing Fluoridation and 98% of Europe is against it?
The Fluoride used has no drug approval; in fact it is an industrial waste, from fertiliser or smelting-plant chimney-scrubbers. It contains heavy metal impurities including Arsenic, Lead and Antimony as well as Uranium 238. And it is illegal to discharge it into the environment, or dump it at sea…
A cynic might wonder if it’s put in the water supply so that each time we wash the car, or flush the toilet we conveniently tip an industrial waste into the environment in a manner that is otherwise illegal.
It was one thing for Americans to solve a toxic waste problem in this manner, but to export this idea to tea-drinking nations like Britain and Ireland was downright irresponsible.

Recent Taiwanese research, published in “Nature” magazine found huge variations in the Fluoride content of different teas. This means control of the Fluoride dose is impossible. The concentration of Fluoride in tea could be as much as 41 times the optimum to reduce dental fillings! Even this dental “optimum” is not necessarily good for our general health. If you drink tea you are probably already getting too much Fluoride, as I certainly was. But we can choose to avoid tea we cannot avoid water.

Flouride is a thyroid suppressor, formally used to treat over-active thyroid glands. There are literally hundreds of studies on the thyroid-toxicity of fluoride. Furthermore, Chlorine (which is added to our water) and mercury (which is in our teeth-fillings) are also thyroid suppressors. The aluminium in tea enhances this effect. We seem to be conducting a multi-pronged assault on the thyroids of a whole generation and many people claim that a large percentage of the population is suffering from sub-clinically low thyroid function.
Research, published in 2001, also showed that fluoride calcified the vital pineal gland in the brain with potentially far-reaching consequences.

It would seem that the only argument for Fluoridation is the dental health argument.
But even this is hotly contested. I can do no better than refer you to a paper published in The Irish Medical Journal by Dr. Don MacAuley (Dental Surgeon). He was a supporter of Fluoridation but changed his mind only after looking deeper into Fluoride at the request of some of his patients. His dental-school training had not supplied these perspectives. He outlines some of the multitudinous toxic affects of this poison. (It seems naïve to me, to assume that a substance that has profound effects on teeth and bone would have no other effects on our bodies, particularly on the digestive tract through which it passes). This would not be so alarming were it not such a powerful poison. (Please find his paper attached here:- http://www.rvi.net/~fluoride/vul.htm )
Also Re IBS/Fluoride see
http://www.npwa.freeserve.co.uk/IBS.html


Resources:

http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/html/picture_i.html

http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/html/picture_i.html
http://64.177.90.157/science/
http://64.177.90.157/science/
http://directory.google.com/Top/Society/Issues/Health/Water_Treatment/Fluoridation/?il=1

Posted by: L Harley on January 8, 2004 03:11 PM

 


Flux is wrong.
I fabricated nothing and exaggerated nothing.
It can only be malicious speculation on his part.

If you have a "cosy" image of Flourides consider this
The American “Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products” (5th. Edition) rates fluoride only slightly less toxic than arsenic, and more toxic than lead!
This made it a useful rat poison.
And yet their Environmental Protection Agency permits 250 times more Fluoride than lead, in water. Is this logical?
Moreover there is a goal of zero to be achieved for the, less poisonous, lead!

If we found that lead or arsenic hardened teeth would we add them to water?
Well Fluoride is just as toxic, with scores of proven detrimental effects on the body.
Why is Britain pursuing Fluoridation when medical/expert opinion is becoming more sceptical about it, and whilst Ireland is considering reversing Fluoridation and 98% of Europe is against it?
The Fluoride used has no drug approval; in fact it is an industrial waste, from fertiliser or smelting-plant chimney-scrubbers. It contains heavy metal impurities including Arsenic, Lead and Antimony as well as Uranium 238. And it is illegal to discharge it into the environment, or dump it at sea…
A cynic might wonder if it’s put in the water supply so that each time we wash the car, or flush the toilet we conveniently tip an industrial waste into the environment in a manner that is otherwise illegal.
It was one thing for Americans to solve a toxic waste problem in this manner, but to export this idea to tea-drinking nations like Britain and Ireland was downright irresponsible.

Recent Taiwanese research, published in “Nature” magazine found huge variations in the Fluoride content of different teas. This means control of the Fluoride dose is impossible. The concentration of Fluoride in tea could be as much as 41 times the optimum to reduce dental fillings! Even this dental “optimum” is not necessarily good for our general health. If you drink tea you are probably already getting too much Fluoride, as I certainly was. But we can choose to avoid tea we cannot avoid water.

Flouride is a thyroid suppressor, formally used to treat over-active thyroid glands. There are literally hundreds of studies on the thyroid-toxicity of fluoride. Furthermore, Chlorine (which is added to our water) and mercury (which is in our teeth-fillings) are also thyroid suppressors. The aluminium in tea enhances this effect. We seem to be conducting a multi-pronged assault on the thyroids of a whole generation and many people claim that a large percentage of the population is suffering from sub-clinically low thyroid function.
Research, published in 2001, also showed that fluoride calcified the vital pineal gland in the brain with potentially far-reaching consequences.

It would seem that the only argument for Fluoridation is the dental health argument.
But even this is hotly contested. I can do no better than refer you to a paper published in The Irish Medical Journal by Dr. Don MacAuley (Dental Surgeon). He was a supporter of Fluoridation but changed his mind only after looking deeper into Fluoride at the request of some of his patients. His dental-school training had not supplied these perspectives. He outlines some of the multitudinous toxic affects of this poison. (It seems naïve to me, to assume that a substance that has profound effects on teeth and bone would have no other effects on our bodies, particularly on the digestive tract through which it passes). This would not be so alarming were it not such a powerful poison. (Please find his paper attached here:- http://www.rvi.net/~fluoride/vul.htm )
Also Re IBS/Fluoride see
http://www.npwa.freeserve.co.uk/IBS.html


Resources:

http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/html/picture_i.html

http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/html/picture_i.html
http://64.177.90.157/science/
http://64.177.90.157/science/
http://directory.google.com/Top/Society/Issues/Health/Water_Treatment/Fluoridation/?il=1

Posted by: L Harley on January 8, 2004 03:13 PM

 


The public is wonderfully tolerant. It forgives everything except genius.

Posted by: Matlaga Doug on January 10, 2004 05:19 AM

 


Flux is wrong.
I fabricated nothing and exaggerated nothing.
It can only be malicious speculation on his part.

If you have a "cosy" image of Flourides consider this
The American “Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products” (5th. Edition) rates fluoride only slightly less toxic than arsenic, and more toxic than lead!
This made it a useful rat poison.
And yet their Environmental Protection Agency permits 250 times more Fluoride than lead, in water. Is this logical?
Moreover there is a goal of zero to be achieved for the, less poisonous, lead!

If we found that lead or arsenic hardened teeth would we add them to water?
Well Fluoride is just as toxic, with scores of proven detrimental effects on the body.
Why is Britain pursuing Fluoridation when medical/expert opinion is becoming more sceptical about it, and whilst Ireland is considering reversing Fluoridation and 98% of Europe is against it?
The Fluoride used has no drug approval; in fact it is an industrial waste, from fertiliser or smelting-plant chimney-scrubbers. It contains heavy metal impurities including Arsenic, Lead and Antimony as well as Uranium 238. And it is illegal to discharge it into the environment, or dump it at sea…
A cynic might wonder if it’s put in the water supply so that each time we wash the car, or flush the toilet we conveniently tip an industrial waste into the environment in a manner that is otherwise illegal.
It was one thing for Americans to solve a toxic waste problem in this manner, but to export this idea to tea-drinking nations like Britain and Ireland was downright irresponsible.

Recent Taiwanese research, published in “Nature” magazine found huge variations in the Fluoride content of different teas. This means control of the Fluoride dose is impossible. The concentration of Fluoride in tea could be as much as 41 times the optimum to reduce dental fillings! Even this dental “optimum” is not necessarily good for our general health. If you drink tea you are probably already getting too much Fluoride, as I certainly was. But we can choose to avoid tea we cannot avoid water.

Flouride is a thyroid suppressor, formally used to treat over-active thyroid glands. There are literally hundreds of studies on the thyroid-toxicity of fluoride. Furthermore, Chlorine (which is added to our water) and mercury (which is in our teeth-fillings) are also thyroid suppressors. The aluminium in tea enhances this effect. We seem to be conducting a multi-pronged assault on the thyroids of a whole generation and many people claim that a large percentage of the population is suffering from sub-clinically low thyroid function.
Research, published in 2001, also showed that fluoride calcified the vital pineal gland in the brain with potentially far-reaching consequences.

It would seem that the only argument for Fluoridation is the dental health argument.
But even this is hotly contested. I can do no better than refer you to a paper published in The Irish Medical Journal by Dr. Don MacAuley (Dental Surgeon). He was a supporter of Fluoridation but changed his mind only after looking deeper into Fluoride at the request of some of his patients. His dental-school training had not supplied these perspectives. He outlines some of the multitudinous toxic affects of this poison. (It seems naïve to me, to assume that a substance that has profound effects on teeth and bone would have no other effects on our bodies, particularly on the digestive tract through which it passes). This would not be so alarming were it not such a powerful poison. (Please find his paper attached here:- http://www.rvi.net/~fluoride/vul.htm )
Also Re IBS/Fluoride see
http://www.npwa.freeserve.co.uk/IBS.html


Resources:

http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/html/picture_i.html

http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/html/picture_i.html
http://64.177.90.157/science/
http://64.177.90.157/science/
http://directory.google.com/Top/Society/Issues/Health/Water_Treatment/Fluoridation/?il=1

Posted by: on November 11, 2004 04:18 AM

 


Flux is wrong.
I fabricated nothing and exaggerated nothing.
It can only be malicious speculation on his part.

If you have a "cosy" image of Flourides consider this
The American “Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products” (5th. Edition) rates fluoride only slightly less toxic than arsenic, and more toxic than lead!
This made it a useful rat poison.
And yet their Environmental Protection Agency permits 250 times more Fluoride than lead, in water. Is this logical?
Moreover there is a goal of zero to be achieved for the, less poisonous, lead!

If we found that lead or arsenic hardened teeth would we add them to water?
Well Fluoride is just as toxic, with scores of proven detrimental effects on the body.
Why is Britain pursuing Fluoridation when medical/expert opinion is becoming more sceptical about it, and whilst Ireland is considering reversing Fluoridation and 98% of Europe is against it?
The Fluoride used has no drug approval; in fact it is an industrial waste, from fertiliser or smelting-plant chimney-scrubbers. It contains heavy metal impurities including Arsenic, Lead and Antimony as well as Uranium 238. And it is illegal to discharge it into the environment, or dump it at sea…
A cynic might wonder if it’s put in the water supply so that each time we wash the car, or flush the toilet we conveniently tip an industrial waste into the environment in a manner that is otherwise illegal.
It was one thing for Americans to solve a toxic waste problem in this manner, but to export this idea to tea-drinking nations like Britain and Ireland was downright irresponsible.

Recent Taiwanese research, published in “Nature” magazine found huge variations in the Fluoride content of different teas. This means control of the Fluoride dose is impossible. The concentration of Fluoride in tea could be as much as 41 times the optimum to reduce dental fillings! Even this dental “optimum” is not necessarily good for our general health. If you drink tea you are probably already getting too much Fluoride, as I certainly was. But we can choose to avoid tea we cannot avoid water.

Flouride is a thyroid suppressor, formally used to treat over-active thyroid glands. There are literally hundreds of studies on the thyroid-toxicity of fluoride. Furthermore, Chlorine (which is added to our water) and mercury (which is in our teeth-fillings) are also thyroid suppressors. The aluminium in tea enhances this effect. We seem to be conducting a multi-pronged assault on the thyroids of a whole generation and many people claim that a large percentage of the population is suffering from sub-clinically low thyroid function.
Research, published in 2001, also showed that fluoride calcified the vital pineal gland in the brain with potentially far-reaching consequences.

It would seem that the only argument for Fluoridation is the dental health argument.
But even this is hotly contested. I can do no better than refer you to a paper published in The Irish Medical Journal by Dr. Don MacAuley (Dental Surgeon). He was a supporter of Fluoridation but changed his mind only after looking deeper into Fluoride at the request of some of his patients. His dental-school training had not supplied these perspectives. He outlines some of the multitudinous toxic affects of this poison. (It seems naïve to me, to assume that a substance that has profound effects on teeth and bone would have no other effects on our bodies, particularly on the digestive tract through which it passes). This would not be so alarming were it not such a powerful poison. (Please find his paper attached here:- http://www.rvi.net/~fluoride/vul.htm )
Also Re IBS/Fluoride see
http://www.npwa.freeserve.co.uk/IBS.html


Resources:

http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/html/picture_i.html

http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/html/picture_i.html
http://64.177.90.157/science/
http://64.177.90.157/science/
http://directory.google.com/Top/Society/Issues/Health/Water_Treatment/Fluoridation/?il=1

Posted by: Scott on January 5, 2005 11:29 PM

 


Flux is wrong.
I fabricated nothing and exaggerated nothing.
It can only be malicious speculation on his part.

If you have a "cosy" image of Flourides consider this
The American “Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products” (5th. Edition) rates fluoride only slightly less toxic than arsenic, and more toxic than lead!
This made it a useful rat poison.
And yet their Environmental Protection Agency permits 250 times more Fluoride than lead, in water. Is this logical?
Moreover there is a goal of zero to be achieved for the, less poisonous, lead!

If we found that lead or arsenic hardened teeth would we add them to water?
Well Fluoride is just as toxic, with scores of proven detrimental effects on the body.
Why is Britain pursuing Fluoridation when medical/expert opinion is becoming more sceptical about it, and whilst Ireland is considering reversing Fluoridation and 98% of Europe is against it?
The Fluoride used has no drug approval; in fact it is an industrial waste, from fertiliser or smelting-plant chimney-scrubbers. It contains heavy metal impurities including Arsenic, Lead and Antimony as well as Uranium 238. And it is illegal to discharge it into the environment, or dump it at sea…
A cynic might wonder if it’s put in the water supply so that each time we wash the car, or flush the toilet we conveniently tip an industrial waste into the environment in a manner that is otherwise illegal.
It was one thing for Americans to solve a toxic waste problem in this manner, but to export this idea to tea-drinking nations like Britain and Ireland was downright irresponsible.

Recent Taiwanese research, published in “Nature” magazine found huge variations in the Fluoride content of different teas. This means control of the Fluoride dose is impossible. The concentration of Fluoride in tea could be as much as 41 times the optimum to reduce dental fillings! Even this dental “optimum” is not necessarily good for our general health. If you drink tea you are probably already getting too much Fluoride, as I certainly was. But we can choose to avoid tea we cannot avoid water.

Flouride is a thyroid suppressor, formally used to treat over-active thyroid glands. There are literally hundreds of studies on the thyroid-toxicity of fluoride. Furthermore, Chlorine (which is added to our water) and mercury (which is in our teeth-fillings) are also thyroid suppressors. The aluminium in tea enhances this effect. We seem to be conducting a multi-pronged assault on the thyroids of a whole generation and many people claim that a large percentage of the population is suffering from sub-clinically low thyroid function.
Research, published in 2001, also showed that fluoride calcified the vital pineal gland in the brain with potentially far-reaching consequences.

It would seem that the only argument for Fluoridation is the dental health argument.
But even this is hotly contested. I can do no better than refer you to a paper published in The Irish Medical Journal by Dr. Don MacAuley (Dental Surgeon). He was a supporter of Fluoridation but changed his mind only after looking deeper into Fluoride at the request of some of his patients. His dental-school training had not supplied these perspectives. He outlines some of the multitudinous toxic affects of this poison. (It seems naïve to me, to assume that a substance that has profound effects on teeth and bone would have no other effects on our bodies, particularly on the digestive tract through which it passes). This would not be so alarming were it not such a powerful poison. (Please find his paper attached here:- http://www.rvi.net/~fluoride/vul.htm )
Also Re IBS/Fluoride see
http://www.npwa.freeserve.co.uk/IBS.html


Resources:

http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/html/picture_i.html

http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/html/picture_i.html
http://64.177.90.157/science/
http://64.177.90.157/science/
http://directory.google.com/Top/Society/Issues/Health/Water_Treatment/Fluoridation/?il=1

Posted by: Katie on May 1, 2007 02:26 PM

 















Security code:




Please enter the security code displayed on the above grid


Due to our anti-spamming policy the comments you are posting will show up online within few hours from the posting time.



 

 

RGTV News

 

 

A Person Is Only As Valuable As She Can Be Of Help To Others

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

These articles are brought to you strictly for educational and informational purposes.
Be sure to consult your health practitioner of choice prior to any specific use of any of the non drug device or food based medicinal products referenced herein.

The Ads are not a an endorsement of the webmasters or writers on this site and are simply a means to facilitate our ability bring you more information not generally available via mainstream media. You are encouraged to take matters in your own hands with the tools and ideas provided on this site and elsewhere.

 

154



Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz


 

 


Most Popular Articles

Bad News About Statin Drugs

Cod Liver Oil - Number One Superfood

Statin Drugs & Memory Loss

Cold remedies that really work.- update

STATIN DRUGS Side Effects

 

 

Recent articles
Over-The-Counter Natural Cures

C-6 = Legislative Disaster

Comments on: "Fluoride in Drinking Water"

Fluoride - Final Submissions Due Fri., Nov. 27, 2009

Bill C-6: Stacking The Deck - A Classic Strategy

Bill C-6 Questions For MPs Or Any Bill For That Matter!


Archive of all articles on this site

 

 


Most recent comments

Filthy NHS Hospitals

DMSO-The King Antioxidant

Cod Liver Oil - Number One Superfood

Build Your Own, For Almost Free, Electromedical Research Devices

JUST AS THEY'RE ABOUT TO BAN 'EM

 

 

Candida International

What Does MHRA Stand For??

Bono and Bush Party without Koch: AIDS Industry Makes a Mockery of Medical Science

Profit as Usual and to Hell with the Risks: Media Urge that Young Girls Receive Mandatory Cervical Cancer Vaccine

 

Health Supreme

Organic Medicine - Health Supreme NewsGrabs Thursday, 18 March 2010

EU Cancer strategy challenged - Health Supreme NewsGrabs Tuesday, 16 March 2010

Reforming Medicine? - Health Supreme NewsGrabs Thursday, 11 March 2010

 

Evolving Collective Intelligence

Let Us Please Frame Collective Intelligence As Big As It Is

Reflections on the evolution of choice and collective intelligence

Whole System Learning and Evolution -- and the New Journalism

Gathering storms of unwanted change

Protect Sources or Not? - More Complex than It Seems

 

Consensus

Scuola del Risveglio

“Striscia”? Cani sciolti ed ignoranti

La truffa del vaccino contro l’influenza suina e l'ipocrisia buonista di Striscia la notizia

Cancro alla prostata. Prevenzione naturale.

Avviso: La vaccinazione contro l’influenza suina è stata collegata in Gran Bretagna ad una devastante malattia nervosa.

 

Diary of a Knowledge Broker

Giving It Away, Making Money

Greenhouses That Change the World

Cycles of Communication and Collaboration

What Is an "Integrated Solution"?

Thoughts about Value-Add

 

Best sellers from