Share The Wealth by Chris Gupta
June 28, 2003

Avoid fluoride to cure IBS


The following letter has appeared in the UK magazine
PROOF! What works in alternative medicine. February 2002, Vol 6, No.7, page
4.
(PROOF! is published by What Doctors Don't Tell You).

Chris Gupta

Avoid fluoride to cure IBS.

Re irritable bowel syndrome (PROOF! vol 5 no 2). I was surprised to see no
mention of avoiding fluoride, which can cause 'non ulcer dyspeptic '
complaints with symptoms similar to IBS.

Professor A.K. Susheela, a leading scientist in fluoride research and a
senior advisor to the Indian Government, has electron micrographs of the
effects of fluoride on gut cells. She says that, by avoiding fluoride, IBS
symptoms will clear in 15 days. Dental advisor Tony Lees, though sceptical,
took her advice; his symptoms cleared in 15 days.

Liz Vaughan,
Lowick Bridge, Cumbria.

 


posted by Chris Gupta on Saturday June 28 2003
updated on Saturday September 24 2005

URL of this article:
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/2003/06/28/avoid_fluoride_to_cure_ibs.htm

 

 


Related Articles

Artificial Water Fluoridation: Off To A Poor Start / Fluoride Injures The Newborn
Please watch this short 5 minute video: Little Things Matter: The Impact of Toxins on the Developing Brain Toxins such as Arsenic, Lead, Mercury, Aluminum and other known and unknown chemicals, that are often above the legal limits, are deliberately added to our water to manage the disposal of toxic industrial waste chemicals under the pretense of "safe and effective" for water fluoridation mantra.Knowing and acting on the above should... [read more]
December 30, 2014 - Chris Gupta

Drinking Water Fluoridation is Genotoxic & Teratogenic
This paper by Prof. Joe Cummins is a very important 5 minute delegation made to London Ontario Canada "Civic Works Committee" public participation meeting on January 25, 2012 on fluoride*. While a bit technical it is short and easy to grasp. A must read as it goes to the heart of the matter regarding the well established toxicity of fluoride which is well in all scientific circles even before water... [read more]
February 06, 2012 - Chris Gupta

Democracy At Work? - PPM On Fluoride
Here is a commentary on the recent (Jan, 25th, 2011) Public Participation Meeting (PPM) on Fluoride in the City of London, Ontario. The meeting started with a strong pro fluoride stance form the City engineer. His lack of knowledge on chemistry of the toxic wastes used to fluoridate water could embarrass even a high school student never mind his own profession. He blatantly violated his "duty to public welfare" as... [read more]
January 29, 2012 - Chris Gupta

 

 


Readers' Comments


Fluoride is not in any way shape or form a cause of IBS.

The "information" posted is almost certainly grossly exaggerated and possibly even fabricated to a point.

The only research I can turn up from this individual is that a *continual overdose* of fluoride can cause gut problems.

Posted by: flux on September 23, 2003 05:49 AM

 


Flux is wrong.
I fabricated nothing and exaggerated nothing.
It can only be malicious speculation on his part.

If you have a "cosy" image of Flourides consider this
The American "Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products" (5th. Edition) rates fluoride only slightly less toxic than arsenic, and more toxic than lead!
This made it a useful rat poison.
And yet their Environmental Protection Agency permits 250 times more Fluoride than lead, in water. Is this logical?
Moreover there is a goal of zero to be achieved for the, less poisonous, lead!

If we found that lead or arsenic hardened teeth would we add them to water?
Well Fluoride is just as toxic, with scores of proven detrimental effects on the body.
Why is Britain pursuing Fluoridation when medical/expert opinion is becoming more sceptical about it, and whilst Ireland is considering reversing Fluoridation and 98% of Europe is against it?
The Fluoride used has no drug approval; in fact it is an industrial waste, from fertiliser or smelting-plant chimney-scrubbers. It contains heavy metal impurities including Arsenic, Lead and Antimony as well as Uranium 238. And it is illegal to discharge it into the environment, or dump it at sea┬ů
A cynic might wonder if it's put in the water supply so that each time we wash the car, or flush the toilet we conveniently tip an industrial waste into the environment in a manner that is otherwise illegal.
It was one thing for Americans to solve a toxic waste problem in this manner, but to export this idea to tea-drinking nations like Britain and Ireland was downright irresponsible.

Recent Taiwanese research, published in "Nature" magazine found huge variations in the Fluoride content of different teas. This means control of the Fluoride dose is impossible. The concentration of Fluoride in tea could be as much as 41 times the optimum to reduce dental fillings! Even this dental "optimum" is not necessarily good for our general health. If you drink tea you are probably already getting too much Fluoride, as I certainly was. But we can choose to avoid tea we cannot avoid water.

Flouride is a thyroid suppressor, formally used to treat over-active thyroid glands. There are literally hundreds of studies on the thyroid-toxicity of fluoride. Furthermore, Chlorine (which is added to our water) and mercury (which is in our teeth-fillings) are also thyroid suppressors. The aluminium in tea enhances this effect. We seem to be conducting a multi-pronged assault on the thyroids of a whole generation and many people claim that a large percentage of the population is suffering from sub-clinically low thyroid function.
Research, published in 2001, also showed that fluoride calcified the vital pineal gland in the brain with potentially far-reaching consequences.

It would seem that the only argument for Fluoridation is the dental health argument.
But even this is hotly contested. I can do no better than refer you to a paper published in The Irish Medical Journal by Dr. Don MacAuley (Dental Surgeon). He was a supporter of Fluoridation but changed his mind only after looking deeper into Fluoride at the request of some of his patients. His dental-school training had not supplied these perspectives. He outlines some of the multitudinous toxic affects of this poison. (It seems na´ve to me, to assume that a substance that has profound effects on teeth and bone would have no other effects on our bodies, particularly on the digestive tract through which it passes). This would not be so alarming were it not such a powerful poison. (Please find his paper attached here:- http://www.rvi.net/~fluoride/vul.htm )
Also Re IBS/Fluoride see
http://www.npwa.freeserve.co.uk/IBS.html


Resources:

http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/html/picture_i.html

http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/html/picture_i.html
http://64.177.90.157/science/
http://64.177.90.157/science/
http://directory.google.com/Top/Society/Issues/Health/Water_Treatment/Fluoridation/?il=1

Posted by: Andrew on September 30, 2003 08:10 PM

 


12 years ago I had an accident that broke teeth. This meant no hot drinks. I was suddenly totally free of the IBS that had plagued me daily for 10 years with bloating, tummy cramps and anal mucus.
When I was better, I tested, and retested various beverages┬ů..and it was tea, that would bring back the cramps every time.
I researched tea to discover why it might cause IBS. I noted that tea contained more fluoride than any other edible plant. I found out also that a symptom of fluoride poisoning is gut pain and remembered that Canadian researchers blamed toothpaste for IBS. So, out went the fluoride toothpaste as well as the tea! I went from daily gut pain to total cure!
Now I have had 12 years free of IBS┬ů.except for when I went to live in Feering, Essex for 9 months. The symptoms began to creep back, so I enquired of the local water supplier if they fluoridated. "No need" was the response "you have the highest natural fluoride in the country. I changed to bottled water and the IBS totally disappeared again. This may not amount to a full-blown, "double-blind, medical trial," but it did give "blind" corroborative proof. Because I did not have, and could not have, anticipated an IBS recurrence, since the water at Feering was not "officially" fluoridated.
I pride myself on a rigorously scientific mind so I was prepared to believe that it was only MY IBS that was caused by fluoride. I remained suspicious however, because the enormous rise in IBS was "coincident" with the rise in fluoride-ingestion from water, toothpastes, pesticides, non-stick cookware and mouthwashes.
Scientific methodology means we generally only find links we are looking for. Has anyone looked for a link between TOTAL Fluoride ingestion and IBS?

Posted by: L Harley on November 28, 2003 05:07 PM

 


Flux is wrong.
I fabricated nothing and exaggerated nothing.
It can only be malicious speculation on his part.

If you have a "cosy" image of Flourides consider this
The American "Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products" (5th. Edition) rates fluoride only slightly less toxic than arsenic, and more toxic than lead!
This made it a useful rat poison.
And yet their Environmental Protection Agency permits 250 times more Fluoride than lead, in water. Is this logical?
Moreover there is a goal of zero to be achieved for the, less poisonous, lead!

If we found that lead or arsenic hardened teeth would we add them to water?
Well Fluoride is just as toxic, with scores of proven detrimental effects on the body.
Why are we pursuing Fluoridation when medical/expert opinion is becoming more sceptical about it, and whilst Ireland is considering reversing Fluoridation and 98% of Europe is against it?
The Fluoride used has no drug approval; in fact it is an industrial waste, from fertiliser or smelting-plant chimney-scrubbers. It contains heavy metal impurities including Arsenic, Lead and Antimony as well as Uranium 238. And it is illegal to discharge it into the environment, or dump it at sea┬ů
A cynic might wonder if it's put in the water supply so that each time we wash the car, or flush the toilet we conveniently tip an industrial waste into the environment in a manner that is otherwise illegal.
It was one thing for Americans to solve a toxic waste problem in this manner, but to export this idea to tea-drinking nations like Britain and Ireland was downright irresponsible.

Recent Taiwanese research, published in "Nature" magazine found huge variations in the Fluoride content of different teas. This means control of the Fluoride dose is impossible. The concentration of Fluoride in tea could be as much as 41 times the optimum to reduce dental fillings! Even this dental "optimum" is not necessarily good for our general health. If you drink tea you are probably already getting too much Fluoride, as I certainly was. But we can choose to avoid tea we cannot avoid water.

Flouride is a thyroid suppressor, formally used to treat over-active thyroid glands. There are literally hundreds of studies on the thyroid-toxicity of fluoride. Furthermore, Chlorine (which is added to our water) and mercury (which is in our teeth-fillings) are also thyroid suppressors. The aluminium in tea enhances this effect. We seem to be conducting a multi-pronged assault on the thyroids of a whole generation and many people claim that a large percentage of the population is suffering from sub-clinically low thyroid function.
Research, published in 2001, also showed that fluoride calcified the vital pineal gland in the brain with potentially far-reaching consequences.

It would seem that the only argument for Fluoridation is the dental health argument.
But even this is hotly contested. I can do no better than refer you to a paper published in The Irish Medical Journal by Dr. Don MacAuley (Dental Surgeon). He was a supporter of Fluoridation but changed his mind only after looking deeper into Fluoride at the request of some of his patients. His dental-school training had not supplied these perspectives. He outlines some of the multitudinous toxic affects of this poison. (It seems na´ve to me, to assume that a substance that has profound effects on teeth and bone would have no other effects on our bodies, particularly on the digestive tract through which it passes). This would not be so alarming were it not such a powerful poison. (Please find his paper attached here:- http://www.rvi.net/~fluoride/vul.htm )
Also Re IBS/Fluoride see
http://www.npwa.freeserve.co.uk/IBS.html


Resources:

http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/html/picture_i.html

http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/html/picture_i.html
http://64.177.90.157/science/
http://64.177.90.157/science/
http://directory.google.com/Top/Society/Issues/Health/Water_Treatment/Fluoridation/?il=1

Posted by: L Harley on January 8, 2004 03:11 PM

 


Flux is wrong.
I fabricated nothing and exaggerated nothing.
It can only be malicious speculation on his part.

If you have a "cosy" image of Flourides consider this
The American "Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products" (5th. Edition) rates fluoride only slightly less toxic than arsenic, and more toxic than lead!
This made it a useful rat poison.
And yet their Environmental Protection Agency permits 250 times more Fluoride than lead, in water. Is this logical?
Moreover there is a goal of zero to be achieved for the, less poisonous, lead!

If we found that lead or arsenic hardened teeth would we add them to water?
Well Fluoride is just as toxic, with scores of proven detrimental effects on the body.
Why is Britain pursuing Fluoridation when medical/expert opinion is becoming more sceptical about it, and whilst Ireland is considering reversing Fluoridation and 98% of Europe is against it?
The Fluoride used has no drug approval; in fact it is an industrial waste, from fertiliser or smelting-plant chimney-scrubbers. It contains heavy metal impurities including Arsenic, Lead and Antimony as well as Uranium 238. And it is illegal to discharge it into the environment, or dump it at sea┬ů
A cynic might wonder if it's put in the water supply so that each time we wash the car, or flush the toilet we conveniently tip an industrial waste into the environment in a manner that is otherwise illegal.
It was one thing for Americans to solve a toxic waste problem in this manner, but to export this idea to tea-drinking nations like Britain and Ireland was downright irresponsible.

Recent Taiwanese research, published in "Nature" magazine found huge variations in the Fluoride content of different teas. This means control of the Fluoride dose is impossible. The concentration of Fluoride in tea could be as much as 41 times the optimum to reduce dental fillings! Even this dental "optimum" is not necessarily good for our general health. If you drink tea you are probably already getting too much Fluoride, as I certainly was. But we can choose to avoid tea we cannot avoid water.

Flouride is a thyroid suppressor, formally used to treat over-active thyroid glands. There are literally hundreds of studies on the thyroid-toxicity of fluoride. Furthermore, Chlorine (which is added to our water) and mercury (which is in our teeth-fillings) are also thyroid suppressors. The aluminium in tea enhances this effect. We seem to be conducting a multi-pronged assault on the thyroids of a whole generation and many people claim that a large percentage of the population is suffering from sub-clinically low thyroid function.
Research, published in 2001, also showed that fluoride calcified the vital pineal gland in the brain with potentially far-reaching consequences.

It would seem that the only argument for Fluoridation is the dental health argument.
But even this is hotly contested. I can do no better than refer you to a paper published in The Irish Medical Journal by Dr. Don MacAuley (Dental Surgeon). He was a supporter of Fluoridation but changed his mind only after looking deeper into Fluoride at the request of some of his patients. His dental-school training had not supplied these perspectives. He outlines some of the multitudinous toxic affects of this poison. (It seems na´ve to me, to assume that a substance that has profound effects on teeth and bone would have no other effects on our bodies, particularly on the digestive tract through which it passes). This would not be so alarming were it not such a powerful poison. (Please find his paper attached here:- http://www.rvi.net/~fluoride/vul.htm )
Also Re IBS/Fluoride see
http://www.npwa.freeserve.co.uk/IBS.html


Resources:

http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/html/picture_i.html

http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/html/picture_i.html
http://64.177.90.157/science/
http://64.177.90.157/science/
http://directory.google.com/Top/Society/Issues/Health/Water_Treatment/Fluoridation/?il=1

Posted by: L Harley on January 8, 2004 03:13 PM

 


The public is wonderfully tolerant. It forgives everything except genius.

Posted by: Matlaga Doug on January 10, 2004 05:19 AM

 


Flux is wrong.
I fabricated nothing and exaggerated nothing.
It can only be malicious speculation on his part.

If you have a "cosy" image of Flourides consider this
The American "Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products" (5th. Edition) rates fluoride only slightly less toxic than arsenic, and more toxic than lead!
This made it a useful rat poison.
And yet their Environmental Protection Agency permits 250 times more Fluoride than lead, in water. Is this logical?
Moreover there is a goal of zero to be achieved for the, less poisonous, lead!

If we found that lead or arsenic hardened teeth would we add them to water?
Well Fluoride is just as toxic, with scores of proven detrimental effects on the body.
Why is Britain pursuing Fluoridation when medical/expert opinion is becoming more sceptical about it, and whilst Ireland is considering reversing Fluoridation and 98% of Europe is against it?
The Fluoride used has no drug approval; in fact it is an industrial waste, from fertiliser or smelting-plant chimney-scrubbers. It contains heavy metal impurities including Arsenic, Lead and Antimony as well as Uranium 238. And it is illegal to discharge it into the environment, or dump it at sea┬ů
A cynic might wonder if it's put in the water supply so that each time we wash the car, or flush the toilet we conveniently tip an industrial waste into the environment in a manner that is otherwise illegal.
It was one thing for Americans to solve a toxic waste problem in this manner, but to export this idea to tea-drinking nations like Britain and Ireland was downright irresponsible.

Recent Taiwanese research, published in "Nature" magazine found huge variations in the Fluoride content of different teas. This means control of the Fluoride dose is impossible. The concentration of Fluoride in tea could be as much as 41 times the optimum to reduce dental fillings! Even this dental "optimum" is not necessarily good for our general health. If you drink tea you are probably already getting too much Fluoride, as I certainly was. But we can choose to avoid tea we cannot avoid water.

Flouride is a thyroid suppressor, formally used to treat over-active thyroid glands. There are literally hundreds of studies on the thyroid-toxicity of fluoride. Furthermore, Chlorine (which is added to our water) and mercury (which is in our teeth-fillings) are also thyroid suppressors. The aluminium in tea enhances this effect. We seem to be conducting a multi-pronged assault on the thyroids of a whole generation and many people claim that a large percentage of the population is suffering from sub-clinically low thyroid function.
Research, published in 2001, also showed that fluoride calcified the vital pineal gland in the brain with potentially far-reaching consequences.

It would seem that the only argument for Fluoridation is the dental health argument.
But even this is hotly contested. I can do no better than refer you to a paper published in The Irish Medical Journal by Dr. Don MacAuley (Dental Surgeon). He was a supporter of Fluoridation but changed his mind only after looking deeper into Fluoride at the request of some of his patients. His dental-school training had not supplied these perspectives. He outlines some of the multitudinous toxic affects of this poison. (It seems na´ve to me, to assume that a substance that has profound effects on teeth and bone would have no other effects on our bodies, particularly on the digestive tract through which it passes). This would not be so alarming were it not such a powerful poison. (Please find his paper attached here:- http://www.rvi.net/~fluoride/vul.htm )
Also Re IBS/Fluoride see
http://www.npwa.freeserve.co.uk/IBS.html


Resources:

http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/html/picture_i.html

http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/html/picture_i.html
http://64.177.90.157/science/
http://64.177.90.157/science/
http://directory.google.com/Top/Society/Issues/Health/Water_Treatment/Fluoridation/?il=1

Posted by: on November 11, 2004 04:18 AM

 


Flux is wrong.
I fabricated nothing and exaggerated nothing.
It can only be malicious speculation on his part.

If you have a "cosy" image of Flourides consider this
The American "Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products" (5th. Edition) rates fluoride only slightly less toxic than arsenic, and more toxic than lead!
This made it a useful rat poison.
And yet their Environmental Protection Agency permits 250 times more Fluoride than lead, in water. Is this logical?
Moreover there is a goal of zero to be achieved for the, less poisonous, lead!

If we found that lead or arsenic hardened teeth would we add them to water?
Well Fluoride is just as toxic, with scores of proven detrimental effects on the body.
Why is Britain pursuing Fluoridation when medical/expert opinion is becoming more sceptical about it, and whilst Ireland is considering reversing Fluoridation and 98% of Europe is against it?
The Fluoride used has no drug approval; in fact it is an industrial waste, from fertiliser or smelting-plant chimney-scrubbers. It contains heavy metal impurities including Arsenic, Lead and Antimony as well as Uranium 238. And it is illegal to discharge it into the environment, or dump it at sea┬ů
A cynic might wonder if it's put in the water supply so that each time we wash the car, or flush the toilet we conveniently tip an industrial waste into the environment in a manner that is otherwise illegal.
It was one thing for Americans to solve a toxic waste problem in this manner, but to export this idea to tea-drinking nations like Britain and Ireland was downright irresponsible.

Recent Taiwanese research, published in "Nature" magazine found huge variations in the Fluoride content of different teas. This means control of the Fluoride dose is impossible. The concentration of Fluoride in tea could be as much as 41 times the optimum to reduce dental fillings! Even this dental "optimum" is not necessarily good for our general health. If you drink tea you are probably already getting too much Fluoride, as I certainly was. But we can choose to avoid tea we cannot avoid water.

Flouride is a thyroid suppressor, formally used to treat over-active thyroid glands. There are literally hundreds of studies on the thyroid-toxicity of fluoride. Furthermore, Chlorine (which is added to our water) and mercury (which is in our teeth-fillings) are also thyroid suppressors. The aluminium in tea enhances this effect. We seem to be conducting a multi-pronged assault on the thyroids of a whole generation and many people claim that a large percentage of the population is suffering from sub-clinically low thyroid function.
Research, published in 2001, also showed that fluoride calcified the vital pineal gland in the brain with potentially far-reaching consequences.

It would seem that the only argument for Fluoridation is the dental health argument.
But even this is hotly contested. I can do no better than refer you to a paper published in The Irish Medical Journal by Dr. Don MacAuley (Dental Surgeon). He was a supporter of Fluoridation but changed his mind only after looking deeper into Fluoride at the request of some of his patients. His dental-school training had not supplied these perspectives. He outlines some of the multitudinous toxic affects of this poison. (It seems na´ve to me, to assume that a substance that has profound effects on teeth and bone would have no other effects on our bodies, particularly on the digestive tract through which it passes). This would not be so alarming were it not such a powerful poison. (Please find his paper attached here:- http://www.rvi.net/~fluoride/vul.htm )
Also Re IBS/Fluoride see
http://www.npwa.freeserve.co.uk/IBS.html


Resources:

http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/html/picture_i.html

http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/html/picture_i.html
http://64.177.90.157/science/
http://64.177.90.157/science/
http://directory.google.com/Top/Society/Issues/Health/Water_Treatment/Fluoridation/?il=1

Posted by: Scott on January 5, 2005 11:29 PM

 


Flux is wrong.
I fabricated nothing and exaggerated nothing.
It can only be malicious speculation on his part.

If you have a "cosy" image of Flourides consider this
The American "Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products" (5th. Edition) rates fluoride only slightly less toxic than arsenic, and more toxic than lead!
This made it a useful rat poison.
And yet their Environmental Protection Agency permits 250 times more Fluoride than lead, in water. Is this logical?
Moreover there is a goal of zero to be achieved for the, less poisonous, lead!

If we found that lead or arsenic hardened teeth would we add them to water?
Well Fluoride is just as toxic, with scores of proven detrimental effects on the body.
Why is Britain pursuing Fluoridation when medical/expert opinion is becoming more sceptical about it, and whilst Ireland is considering reversing Fluoridation and 98% of Europe is against it?
The Fluoride used has no drug approval; in fact it is an industrial waste, from fertiliser or smelting-plant chimney-scrubbers. It contains heavy metal impurities including Arsenic, Lead and Antimony as well as Uranium 238. And it is illegal to discharge it into the environment, or dump it at sea┬ů
A cynic might wonder if it's put in the water supply so that each time we wash the car, or flush the toilet we conveniently tip an industrial waste into the environment in a manner that is otherwise illegal.
It was one thing for Americans to solve a toxic waste problem in this manner, but to export this idea to tea-drinking nations like Britain and Ireland was downright irresponsible.

Recent Taiwanese research, published in "Nature" magazine found huge variations in the Fluoride content of different teas. This means control of the Fluoride dose is impossible. The concentration of Fluoride in tea could be as much as 41 times the optimum to reduce dental fillings! Even this dental "optimum" is not necessarily good for our general health. If you drink tea you are probably already getting too much Fluoride, as I certainly was. But we can choose to avoid tea we cannot avoid water.

Flouride is a thyroid suppressor, formally used to treat over-active thyroid glands. There are literally hundreds of studies on the thyroid-toxicity of fluoride. Furthermore, Chlorine (which is added to our water) and mercury (which is in our teeth-fillings) are also thyroid suppressors. The aluminium in tea enhances this effect. We seem to be conducting a multi-pronged assault on the thyroids of a whole generation and many people claim that a large percentage of the population is suffering from sub-clinically low thyroid function.
Research, published in 2001, also showed that fluoride calcified the vital pineal gland in the brain with potentially far-reaching consequences.

It would seem that the only argument for Fluoridation is the dental health argument.
But even this is hotly contested. I can do no better than refer you to a paper published in The Irish Medical Journal by Dr. Don MacAuley (Dental Surgeon). He was a supporter of Fluoridation but changed his mind only after looking deeper into Fluoride at the request of some of his patients. His dental-school training had not supplied these perspectives. He outlines some of the multitudinous toxic affects of this poison. (It seems na´ve to me, to assume that a substance that has profound effects on teeth and bone would have no other effects on our bodies, particularly on the digestive tract through which it passes). This would not be so alarming were it not such a powerful poison. (Please find his paper attached here:- http://www.rvi.net/~fluoride/vul.htm )
Also Re IBS/Fluoride see
http://www.npwa.freeserve.co.uk/IBS.html


Resources:

http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/html/picture_i.html

http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/html/picture_i.html
http://64.177.90.157/science/
http://64.177.90.157/science/
http://directory.google.com/Top/Society/Issues/Health/Water_Treatment/Fluoridation/?il=1

Posted by: Katie on May 1, 2007 02:26 PM

 















Security code:




Please enter the security code displayed on the above grid


Due to our anti-spamming policy the comments you are posting will show up online within few hours from the posting time.



 

   

 

A Person Is Only As Valuable As She Can Be Of Help To Others

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

These articles are brought to you strictly for educational and informational purposes.
Be sure to consult your health practitioner of choice prior to any specific use of any of the non drug device or food based medicinal products referenced herein.

 

154



Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz


 

 


Most Popular Articles

Bad News About Statin Drugs

Cod Liver Oil - Number One Superfood

Statin Drugs & Memory Loss

Cold remedies that really work.- update

STATIN DRUGS Side Effects

 

 

Recent articles
Drinking Water Fluoridation is Genotoxic & Teratogenic

Democracy At Work? - PPM On Fluoride

"Evidence Be Damned...Patient Outcome Is Irrelevant" - From Helke

Why Remove Fluoride From Phosphate Rock To Make Fertilizer

FOFI Codex Meeting Report On Labelling May 9 - 13, 2011

Misconduct Of Health Canada Bureaucrats


Archive of all articles on this site

 

 


Most recent comments

Cold remedies that really work.- update

Why Doctors Don't Recommend More The Use Of Coq10?

Re: Dispelling the Night-Time Frequent Urination

Health via Meditation/Stress Reduction

Build a Low cost & simple Magnetic Pulser

 

 

Candida International

What Does MHRA Stand For??

Bono and Bush Party without Koch: AIDS Industry Makes a Mockery of Medical Science

Profit as Usual and to Hell with the Risks: Media Urge that Young Girls Receive Mandatory Cervical Cancer Vaccine

 

Health Supreme

Multiple sclerosis is Lyme disease: Anatomy of a cover-up

Chromotherapy in Cancer

Inclined Bed Therapy: Tilt your bed for healthful sleep

 

Evolving Collective Intelligence

Let Us Please Frame Collective Intelligence As Big As It Is

Reflections on the evolution of choice and collective intelligence

Whole System Learning and Evolution -- and the New Journalism

Gathering storms of unwanted change

Protect Sources or Not? - More Complex than It Seems

 

Consensus

Islanda, quando il popolo sconfigge l'economia globale.

Il Giorno Fuori dal Tempo, Il significato energetico del 25 luglio

Rinaldo Lampis: L'uso Cosciente delle Energie

Attivazione nei Colli Euganei (PD) della Piramide di Luce

Contatti con gli Abitanti Invisibili della Natura

 

Diary of a Knowledge Broker

Giving It Away, Making Money

Greenhouses That Change the World

Cycles of Communication and Collaboration

What Is an "Integrated Solution"?

Thoughts about Value-Add

 

Best sellers from