|
|
December 13, 2005
Weed Said To Cure Cancer
Categories
Need we say more???
Chris Gupta
------------------------------
WEED SAID TO CURE CANCER
Friday, December 09, 2005 - FreeMarketNews.com
Yet another age-old medical home remedy has been discovered by the medical community, this time in Australia. A story from the Australian Naturopathic Network notes the recent announcement that Euphorbia peplus (commonly known as Radium Weed) has been found "to cause sun spots, Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC) and Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) to disappear, and drop off!"
Brian McDermott, the commentator presenting the story, said, "Our grandmothers taught us this over half-a-century ago, and it was well-known in the bush, where we grew up!" He predicts the so-called experts will now be stumbling over each other in the race to patent their "discovery," and says the whole thing "[r]eminds me of Dr. Bill Cham's Curaderm, which is an extract from Devil's apple, also known for over half-a-century by people in the bush, also effective for skin cancers. Then, they will some years from now, perhaps never discover that Cansema causes melanoma to drop off! (The "authorities" have prohibited the advertising of Cansema for cancer, threatening five years jail, and fines of tens of thousands of dollars!)"
He goes on to predict the day when eucalyptus oil, and even common hydrogen peroxide, will gain positions of acceptance they deserve, but expects that someone somehow will find a way to corner the market, regulate distribution and control the profit margin, even on those well-known time-honored home remedies.
staff reports - Free-Market News Network
posted by Chris Gupta on Tuesday December 13 2005
URL of this article:
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/2005/12/13/weed_said_to_cure_cancer.htm
Related Articles
Court Rules-No Forced Anthrax Vaccination
Finally, a judge rules with some integrity and ethics! CB ----- Original Message ----- From: NVICNews To: news@nvic.org Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 9:34 AM Subject: [NVIC] Court Rules-No Forced Anthrax Vaccination E-NEWS FROM THE NATIONAL VACCINE INFORMATION CENTER Vienna, Virginia http://www.nvic.org "Protecting the health and informed consent rights of children since 1982." ===================== BL Fisher Note: After reviewing all the evidence, ths U.S. District Court judge concluded that "Congress... [read more]
October 29, 2004 - Chris Gupta
Electro Medicine and Lyme Disease
While the self righteous medical Mafia and bigoted sceptics continue to debunk electromedicine and other alternatives - time and time we see lay people do what the multi billion dollar industry does not want to do. Yet they will clamor all this is anecdotal, not been peer reviewed, trialed etc. etc. Not realizing how 'el stupid o' they look in the face of the fact that some of these results... [read more]
September 02, 2004 - Chris Gupta
The Dirty Little Secret between the FDA and Drug Industry
$1.2 billion to buy the FDA? What you say never - well read the following. This is yet again proof that the governments work for the industry under the pretense of looking after our interests. Most new drugs are produced with expediency at the expense of safety and efficacy. Frequently they are not as effective as the older one's that they may be replacing... Secrecy & Conflict of Interest Why... [read more]
August 26, 2004 - Chris Gupta
Readers' Comments
Ron,
"The CEA test is not a screening test for cancer. It is not useful for detecting the presence of cancer. Many cancers do not produce an increased CEA level. Some noncancerous diseases, such as hepatitis, inflammatory bowel disease, pancreatitis, and obstructive pulmonary disease, may cause an elevated CEA level."
"Certain types of cancer treatments, such as hormone therapy for breast cancer, may actually cause the CEA level to go up. This elevation does not accurately reflect the state of the disease. It is sometimes referred to as a "flare response." Recognition that a rise in CEA may be temporary and due to therapy is significant. If this possibility is not taken into account, the patient may be unnecessarily discouraged. Further, treatment that is actually effective may be stopped or changed prematurely."
The above is extracted from:
http://www.healthatoz.com/healthatoz/Atoz/ency/carcinoembryonic_antigen_test.jsp
Hulda Clark has been giving up to 4 grams of CQ10 apparently with good results see:
CQ10 (coenzyme Q10) and Cancer
Posted by: Ron Campeanu on December 17, 2005 07:18 PM
Ron,
"The CEA test is not a screening test for cancer. It is not useful for detecting the presence of cancer. Many cancers do not produce an increased CEA level. Some noncancerous diseases, such as hepatitis, inflammatory bowel disease, pancreatitis, and obstructive pulmonary disease, may cause an elevated CEA level."
"Certain types of cancer treatments, such as hormone therapy for breast cancer, may actually cause the CEA level to go up. This elevation does not accurately reflect the state of the disease. It is sometimes referred to as a "flare response." Recognition that a rise in CEA may be temporary and due to therapy is significant. If this possibility is not taken into account, the patient may be unnecessarily discouraged. Further, treatment that is actually effective may be stopped or changed prematurely."
The above is extracted from:
http://www.healthatoz.com/healthatoz/Atoz/ency/carcinoembryonic_antigen_test.jsp
Hulda Clark has been giving up to 4 grams of CQ10 apparently with good results see:
CQ10 (coenzyme Q10) and Cancer
Posted by: Chris Gupta on December 17, 2005 08:28 PM
Ron,
"The CEA test is not a screening test for cancer. It is not useful for detecting the presence of cancer. Many cancers do not produce an increased CEA level. Some noncancerous diseases, such as hepatitis, inflammatory bowel disease, pancreatitis, and obstructive pulmonary disease, may cause an elevated CEA level."
"Certain types of cancer treatments, such as hormone therapy for breast cancer, may actually cause the CEA level to go up. This elevation does not accurately reflect the state of the disease. It is sometimes referred to as a "flare response." Recognition that a rise in CEA may be temporary and due to therapy is significant. If this possibility is not taken into account, the patient may be unnecessarily discouraged. Further, treatment that is actually effective may be stopped or changed prematurely."
The above is extracted from:
http://www.healthatoz.com/healthatoz/Atoz/ency/carcinoembryonic_antigen_test.jsp
Hulda Clark has been giving up to 4 grams of CQ10 apparently with good results see:
CQ10 (coenzyme Q10) and Cancer
Posted by: Ron Campeanu on June 27, 2006 07:59 AM
hi ,Ron interesting article ,i have mild diabeties how the mwo
could help me ,as i find the diabeties a real pest.
john clarkson gosford
Posted by: john clarkson on January 13, 2009 04:10 AM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
These articles are brought to you strictly for educational and informational purposes.
Be sure to consult your health practitioner of choice prior to any specific use of any of the non drug device or food based medicinal products referenced herein.
The Ads are not a an endorsement of the webmasters or writers on this site
and are simply a means to facilitate our ability bring you more information
not generally available via mainstream media. You are encouraged to take
matters in your own hands with the tools and ideas provided on this site and
elsewhere.
2220
|
|
