Share The Wealth by Chris Gupta

Self-Sufficiency Is The Key To Empowerment And Freedom

Self-Sufficiency Is The Key To Empowerment And Freedom
February 28, 2006

Avoid X-Rays Especially To Children

Categories

"What parents are not told when their doctors schedule this relatively new procedure is that these scans are calibrated for adults, so children absorb up to six times the radiation needed to produce clear images. These doses are much larger than the doses to which the victims of Three Mile Island were subjected. Children have more rapidly dividing cells than adults, and they are much more susceptible to radiation damage."

Here is another sloppy application particularly to children. Little has been known for a long time that thyroid cancer is directly associated with X-Ray radiation particularly in children*. Further the calibration of some machines may change between calibration and others may not have been calibrated properly... Always ask to see the last calibration certificate and date. Best is to avoid X-Rays unless it is life and death situation.

Chris Gupta
--------------------

Avoid being X-rayed unless absolutely necessary. The procedure is often ordered by doctors eager to cover themselves from lawsuits, which is understandable, but hard on patients. There is no safe level of radiation! 'Photo opportunity' X-rays and ultra-sounds of babies should be considered child abuse. Use your common sense - why bombard a vulnerable foetus with either of these powerful energies? What might it do to the delicate mechanisms of the brain, the eyes, the ears? Do you want to be responsible for the subtle brain damage that investigators believe is caused by these unnecessary procedures?

I'd love to get my hands on the gung-ho American doctors who are condemning thousands of children to early death from radiation-induced cancers. Overused CT scans** (US doctors are prescribing 2 million of these annually) are the culprits, as doses of radiation from a single procedure can be hundreds of times larger than the effective dose of radiation from a conventional radiographic procedure. What parents are not told when their doctors schedule this relatively new procedure is that these scans are calibrated for adults, so children absorb up to six times the radiation needed to produce clear images. These doses are much larger than the doses to which the victims of Three Mile Island were subjected. Children have more rapidly dividing cells than adults, and they are much more susceptible to radiation damage.

Look at it this way: you would want to think long and hard before subjecting your young daughter to the equivalent of up to 20 mammograms in one procedure. What did doctors do before these diabolical things were invented? Somehow we all managed to set along with the family doctor who gave us a real physical, looked at our irises, and asked pointed questions about our diets.

Extracted from: Take Control of Your Health and Escape the Sickness Industry

*Effects of Childhood X-Ray Treatment to the Head and Neck Area

Thyroid abnormalities are sometimes due to X-ray treatment, received in childhood, to the head and neck area. This method of treatment for children was frequently used prior to 1950 for a number of conditions. It is advisable to consult your physician if you or members of your family have ever received this treatment.
The following information from the Canadian Cancer Society is important for you to understand.

Causes of Thyroid Cancer
The only known risk for thyroid cancer is radiation. From the 1920s to the mid-1950s, thousands of children received X-ray treatments to the head and neck areas. Back then, X-ray therapy was used to treat swollen tonsils and adenoids, ring worm of the scalp, acne and other non-cancerous conditions; no one foresaw its long-term complications.
As follow-up studies began to link radiation therapy to higher rates of thyroid cancer, this type of therapy was abandoned. Although very few people who underwent X-ray therapy as children are actually diagnosed today with thyroid cancer, anyone who had X-rays to the head and neck areas should regularly consult a physician.

Hope for the Future
Detection of thyroid cancer in people who had X-ray treatments as children is the greatest hope for the future. Even though most of these people will never develop cancer of the thyroid, a physician should regularly check them whether or not they have symptoms. Further hope for the future lies in uncovering other potential causes of this type of cancer.
(Excerpts from Facts on Thyroid Cancer, Canadian Cancer Society, 1986)

Important Notice - The information contained within is for general information only and consequently cannot be considered as medical advice to any person. For individual treatment or diagnosis consult your health care professional.

Approved for distribution by:
Thyroid Foundation of Canada
La Fondation canadienne de la Thyroïde
797 Princess St., Suite 304, Kingston ON K7L 1G1

Tel: (613) 544-8364/ 1-800-267-8822
Fax: (613) 54-9731
Website: www.thyroid.ca


**Full-Body CT Scans Scale Up Cancer Risk
Tracy Hampton, PhD

JAMA. 2004;292:1669.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Elective full-body computed tomography (CT) scans in healthy individuals have long been controversial because of uncertainties surrounding their ability to detect hidden disease. Now, researchers report that radiation from a single full-body CT examination corresponds to a dose comparable with a level of radiation linked to increased cancer mortality in low-dose atomic bomb survivors from Hiroshima and Nagasaki, in Japan (Radiology. 2004;232:735-738).

The authors question the use of such an expensive procedure of disputed value in asymptomatic people in light of such risk. Full-body CT scans deliver a dose of radiation nearly 100 times that of a typical mammogram.

"There is direct epidemiological evidence that the sorts of doses of relevance for a single full-body CT scan do increase an individual's cancer risk," said lead . . .

 


posted by Chris Gupta on Tuesday February 28 2006

URL of this article:
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/2006/02/28/avoid_xrays_especially_to_children.htm

 


Related Articles

Liver Cleanse And Gallstone Removal
Updated repost. CG Hi Theresa, Here it is (the original email). You have to do it several times to completely remove the stones. Just be warned that removing your gallbladder will leave you susceptible to Diabetes, Heart diseases etc. My motto don't do anything that you can't reverse! See also: What conventional medicine won't dare tell you about gall bladder removal surgery Please let me know your experience if do... [read more]
June 03, 2005 - Chris Gupta

Melanoma Melodrama
I wrote about the "sunlight scare" in the last Daily Dose (7/8/3). But there's a lot more you need to know. Every summer, the news media performs the annual rite of the Aztec Chicken Littles: The sky isn't falling, but the sun is - right on your cancer-prone skin. The headline on healthday.com: More than One Million New Cases in U.S. This Year. OooohWEE! If that's true, people must be... [read more]
July 13, 2003 - Chris Gupta

Health warning: screening can seriously damage patients
See my earlier article The Depths of Deceit Mammography for some salient background. Particularly the effects of X-Rays Chris Gupta A story about cancer screening - they seem to finally recognize that something's not right about their approach. The numbers tell. Josef Health warning: screening can seriously damage patients Breast cancer checks at centre of fresh controversy as concerns grow that hi-tech clinics may harm those seeking to pre-empt illness... [read more]
July 12, 2003 - Chris Gupta

 


Readers' Comments


Hi Chris,

I love your site and all the great work you do and realize how frustrated and angry with the "industry of disease" we can feel; I agree heartily with you! However, have you thought how your frequent snide, sarcastic rants and comments look to reasonable, rational people who are cautiously checking out health care alternatives.

Posted by: Lisa on February 28, 2006 05:17 PM

 


Hi Chris,

I love your site and all the great work you do and realize how frustrated and angry with the "industry of disease" we can feel; I agree heartily with you! However, have you thought how your frequent snide, sarcastic rants and comments look to reasonable, rational people who are cautiously checking out health care alternatives.

Posted by: Jacqui on October 20, 2006 09:43 AM

 















Security code:




Please enter the security code displayed on the above grid


Due to our anti-spamming policy the comments you are posting will show up online within few hours from the posting time.



 

 

RGTV News

 

 

A Person Is Only As Valuable As She Can Be Of Help To Others

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

These articles are brought to you strictly for educational and informational purposes.
Be sure to consult your health practitioner of choice prior to any specific use of any of the non drug device or food based medicinal products referenced herein.

The Ads are not a an endorsement of the webmasters or writers on this site and are simply a means to facilitate our ability bring you more information not generally available via mainstream media. You are encouraged to take matters in your own hands with the tools and ideas provided on this site and elsewhere.

 

2335



Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz


 

 


Most Popular Articles

Bad News About Statin Drugs

Cod Liver Oil - Number One Superfood

Statin Drugs & Memory Loss

Cold remedies that really work.- update

STATIN DRUGS Side Effects

 

 

Recent articles
Over-The-Counter Natural Cures

C-6 = Legislative Disaster

Comments on: "Fluoride in Drinking Water"

Fluoride - Final Submissions Due Fri., Nov. 27, 2009

Bill C-6: Stacking The Deck - A Classic Strategy

Bill C-6 Questions For MPs Or Any Bill For That Matter!


Archive of all articles on this site

 

 


Most recent comments

Update on Navarro Urine Cancer Test

Lawsuits Filed Over Lipitor Side Effects

Retardation, Low IQ & Depression From Fluoride

Filthy NHS Hospitals

DMSO-The King Antioxidant

 

 

Candida International

What Does MHRA Stand For??

Bono and Bush Party without Koch: AIDS Industry Makes a Mockery of Medical Science

Profit as Usual and to Hell with the Risks: Media Urge that Young Girls Receive Mandatory Cervical Cancer Vaccine

 

Health Supreme

Organic Medicine - Health Supreme NewsGrabs Thursday, 18 March 2010

EU Cancer strategy challenged - Health Supreme NewsGrabs Tuesday, 16 March 2010

Reforming Medicine? - Health Supreme NewsGrabs Thursday, 11 March 2010

 

Evolving Collective Intelligence

Let Us Please Frame Collective Intelligence As Big As It Is

Reflections on the evolution of choice and collective intelligence

Whole System Learning and Evolution -- and the New Journalism

Gathering storms of unwanted change

Protect Sources or Not? - More Complex than It Seems

 

Consensus

Scuola del Risveglio

“Striscia”? Cani sciolti ed ignoranti

La truffa del vaccino contro l’influenza suina e l'ipocrisia buonista di Striscia la notizia

Cancro alla prostata. Prevenzione naturale.

Avviso: La vaccinazione contro l’influenza suina è stata collegata in Gran Bretagna ad una devastante malattia nervosa.

 

Diary of a Knowledge Broker

Giving It Away, Making Money

Greenhouses That Change the World

Cycles of Communication and Collaboration

What Is an "Integrated Solution"?

Thoughts about Value-Add

 

Best sellers from