UPI Investigates: The vaccine conflict
My comments are inerted in bold italics in body.
See also: Pharmaceutical Quality Control Myth
Chris
By Mark Benjamin
Investigations Editor
Published 7/20/2003 8:45 AM
WASHINGTON, July 20 (UPI) -- The screaming started four hours after 8-month-old Chaise Irons received a vaccination against rotavirus, recommended in June 1998 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for every infant to prevent serious diarrhea.Within a day he was vomiting and eliminating blood. Doctors performed emergency surgery, saving him by repairing his intestines, which were folding in on one another. A doctor later figured out the vaccine caused Chaise's problem.
In October 1999, after 15 reports of such incidents, the CDC withdrew its recommendation for the vaccination -- not because of the problem, the agency claims, but because bad publicity might give vaccines in general a bad name.
And these are the agencies purporting to protect us. Imagine! CDG
But a four-month investigation by United Press International found a pattern of serious problems linked to vaccines recommended by the CDC -- and a web of close ties between the agency and the companies that make vaccines.
Critics say those ties are an unholy alliance in a war against disease where vaccine side effects have damaged, hurt or killed people, mostly children.
"The CDC is a disgrace. It is a corrupt organization," said Stephen A. Sheller, a Philadelphia attorney who has sued vaccine makers for what he says were bad vaccines. "The drug companies have them on their payroll."
The CDC, based in Atlanta, said it is committed to fighting disease and balancing vaccine side effects.
"Our goal is to protect the public health from both disease and from serious adverse events," said Dr. Walter Orenstein, director of the CDC's National Immunization Program.
The agency sets the U.S. childhood immunization schedule, or the list of shots pediatricians give children. Some states say kids can't go to public school unless they have had CDC-endorsed vaccines.
Since the mid-1980s the agency has doubled the number of vaccines children get, up to nearly 40 doses before age 2. The CDC also tracks possible side effects, along with the Food and Drug Administration. This puts the agency in the awkward position of evaluating the safety of its own recommendations.
An advisory committee of outside experts helps the CDC make vaccine recommendations. UPI found:
-- In two cases in the past four years, vaccines endorsed by the CDC were pulled off the market after a number of infants and adults appear to have suffered devastating side effects, and some died. Critics now worry about a possible link between vaccines and autism, diabetes, asthma and sudden infant death syndrome, among other ailments.
-- Members of the CDC's Vaccine Advisory Committee get money from vaccine manufacturers. Relationships have included: sharing a vaccine patent; owning stock in a vaccine company; payments for research; getting money to monitor manufacturer vaccine tests; and funding academic departments.
-- The CDC is in the vaccine business. Under a 1980 law, the CDC currently has 28 licensing agreements with companies and one university for vaccines or vaccine-related products. It has eight ongoing projects to collaborate on new vaccines.
The situation, while legal, gives critics plenty of reason to worry that vaccine side effects are worse than CDC officials say.
"When you take a look at the ever-increasing numbers of doses of vaccines babies have gotten over the past two decades and you see this corresponding rise in chronic disease and disability in our children, it is out of control," said Barbara Loe Fisher, president of the National Vaccine Information Center, which does not accept money from vaccine manufacturers.
She worries that vaccines might be linked to ballooning rates of chronic illness like autism, which has increased tenfold since the mid-1980s, and asthma, which has more than doubled since 1980.
Fisher's group wants to overhaul the mass vaccination system.
"The CDC has a very hard time investigating in an unbiased way what is happening to our children because of ideological and financial conflicts of interest," she said. Fisher believes a vaccine injured her son in the 1980s.
Developing a vaccine can cost a half a billion dollars. A recommendation by the CDC guarantees a market and a 1986 law limits manufacturers' liability for side effects.
The annual global market for vaccines is expected to go from $6 billion today to $10 billion by 2006.
The CDC said the best vaccine advisers often have ties to the industry, making potential conflicts unavoidable. Agency officials review possible conflicts.
"The issue of safety is critical and you need people extremely knowledgeable about safety to develop the best policy formulations," said Orenstein. The agency has to weigh possible side effects against dangerous disease. "We need to put safety data in context with risk-of-disease data," he said.
The agency said ethics officials also review partnerships with companies to make new vaccines.
"Each one of those proposed activities is reviewed by the CDC's ethics officials, by our office of general counsel, and by me to make sure that there are no conflicts of interest," said Dixie Snider, CDC associate director for science.
Andrew Watkins, director of the CDC's Technology Transfer Office, negotiates licensing agreements with outside companies. He said agency scientists routinely leave to work with vaccine manufacturers.
"It does happen that some of our inventors end up working for a manufacturer," Watkins said. "In fact, we consider that a wonderful tool of technology transfer, although we do lose a good scientist."
But Watkins said very little money actually changes hands, making it unlikely to influence the CDC. He said companies, including vaccine makers, only gave the CDC around $1 million last year to work on collaborative projects and the agency only got $150,000 last year in licensing fees.
"We are a real cheap date," Watkins said.
Rep. Dan Burton, R-Ind., who has been investigating vaccines for four years, said conflicts at the CDC are a problem, particularly on the vaccine advisory panel. He believes vaccines triggered his grandson's autism.
"This presents a real paradox when the CDC routinely allows scientists with blatant conflicts of interest to serve on influential advisory committees that make recommendations on new vaccines, as well as policy matters," Burton told UPI. "All the while these same scientists have financial ties, academic affiliations, and other vested interests in the products and companies for which they are supposed to be providing unbiased oversight."
Because of concern over vaccine side effects, Congress in 1986 passed a law setting up a database at the CDC to track reports from doctors, manufacturers and the public of possible side effects from vaccines that started in 1991.
As of the end of last year, the system contained 244,424 total reports of possible reactions to vaccines, including 99,145 emergency room visits, 5,149 life-threatening reactions, 27,925 hospitalizations, 5,775 disabilities, and 5,309 deaths, according to data compiled by Dr. Mark Geier, a vaccine researcher in Silver Spring, Md. The data represents roughly 1 billion doses of vaccines, according to Geier.
The reports do not necessarily show that a vaccine caused a problem.
The pain of Rotashield
The CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, ACIP, helps the agency decide what vaccines are safe enough to recommend. It is made up of 12 experts from hospitals, universities and state health departments.
In June 1998, the committee recommended that all infants be vaccinated against rotavirus. The virus causes bad diarrhea that can be fatal.
At the time, vaccine maker Wyeth had a vaccine called Rotashield. Merck hoped to soon follow with its own version.
Wyeth ended up pulling its vaccine off the U.S. market in October 1999 after it was suspected of causing an excruciating contortion where a child's large intestine folds over the small one.
Emergency surgery is sometimes required to prevent death. That was the case with 8-month-old Chaise Irons.
"Chaise was vomiting blood and blood was coming out of his stool," said his mother, Jayne Irons, from her home in Malibu, Calif. Doctors performed emergency surgery to repair Chaise's intestines, saving his life.
Jayne said she never questioned her doctor's advice to give Chaise the vaccine. "I had no reason to doubt anybody. I am such a believer in vaccinations," Irons said.
The Irons' will get $25,000 for Chaise's injuries from a government compensation program.
For Rotashield, the CDC's public database contains 664 total reports possibly caused by the vaccine, including 288 emergency room visits, 63 life-threatening reactions, 232 hospitalizations, 10 disabilities and eight deaths.
"Eight deaths," said Jayne Irons. "You just have to thank God that you are not one of the deaths."
Republican staff on the House Government Reform Committee looked into the CDC panel that recommended the vaccination. Their August 2001 report found that "four out of eight CDC advisory committee members who voted to approve guidelines for the rotavirus vaccine in June 1998 had financial ties to pharmaceutical companies that were developing different versions of the vaccine."
A transcript from that June 1998 meeting shows the committee voted down an effort by one member to phase in the vaccine because of concern over possible bad side effects. "I'm still a little concerned about the safety issues," Marie Griffin from Vanderbilt University said before that vote.
When asked, members of the committee told UPI their potential conflicts do not affect their judgment.
"I am probably just the kind of person you are talking about," said Paul Offit, chief of infectious diseases at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, who was a committee member until last month. At the same time, he shared a patent for another rotavirus vaccine. Merck has funded Offit's research for 13 years.
"I am a co-holder of a patent for a (rotavirus) vaccine. If this vaccine were to become a routinely recommended vaccine, I would make money off of that," Offit said. "When I review safety data, am I biased? That answer is really easy: absolutely not."
"Is there an unholy alliance between the people who make recommendations about vaccines and the vaccine manufacturers? The answer is no."
Merck bought and delivers copies of Offit's book, "What Every Parent Should Know About Vaccines," to American doctors. The book has a list price of $14.95.
"Merck Vaccine Division is pleased to present you with a copy of the recent publication, 'What Every Parent Should Know About Vaccines,'" says a Dear Doctor letter from Merck. "The authors designed the book to answer questions parents have about vaccines and to dispel misinformation about vaccines that sometimes appears in the public media."
Offit said he does not know how many copies of his book Merck purchased. "I don't have any control over that," he said.
The 2001 Government Reform Committee's investigation noted potential conflicts with another committee member. The chairman of the CDC's Vaccine Advisory Committee, Dartmouth Medical School Professor Dr. John Modlin, owned $26,000 in Merck stock.
In a telephone interview with UPI, Modlin said he had sold that stock, but that he had recently agreed to chair a committee to oversee Merck vaccine clinical trials. Modlin, who was the committee chairman until last month, said he does not know how much compensation he receives from that post, but that Merck "pays my expenses" to attend meetings.
In October 1999, the committee reversed its recommendation that all infants should get rotavirus vaccinations. Modlin said the vaccine was safe enough, but the committee reversed itself out of concern that bad press over Rotashield might make some people stop getting vaccinated altogether.
"There could be some spill-over effects that would have a net negative effect," Modlin said. "I thought that was the committee's finest hour."
Meeting transcripts over the past decade showed that at some meetings, half of the members present had potential conflicts with vaccine manufacturers.
The CDC said that in October 2002 it adopted new guidelines for participating on that advisory committee that in the future will preclude people with conflicts like Offit's from sitting on the committee.
"We learned from that experience (with rotavirus) and have now put in force more stringent criteria recently so we do not nominate people with those kinds of conflicts," said the CDC's Snider.
At the June 2002 committee meeting -- the last meeting for which minutes are available -- four of the 11 members present acknowledged conflicts with Wyeth, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Pfizer, Bayer and Aventis Pasteur. Two of the four did research or vaccine trials for manufacturers. One of the four was a co-holder of a vaccine patent as well as a consultant to Merck.
At odds over autism
At 8:05 a.m. on Monday, July 16, 2001, a vaccine safety committee of the influential Institute of Medicine convened a public meeting at the Charles Hotel in Cambridge, Mass.
The purpose: to discuss whether CDC-recommended vaccines might be responsible for a wave of autism and neurological problems in tens of thousands of American children during the 1990s.
The concern: most vaccines contained a mercury-based preservative called thimerosal. Too much mercury has known toxic effects on the brain.
Since the mid 1980s, the number of childhood vaccinations recommended by the CDC had nearly doubled. The agency recommends nearly 40 doses of vaccines for children today. Also since the mid-1980s the autism rate in the United States had soared by 10 times to an astonishing one child in every 300.
Cause and effect or coincidence?
The vaccine manufacturers deny any connection, but the Institute of Medicine -- part of the National Academy of Sciences and a key adviser to the federal government on medical concerns -- wanted to hear from Dr. Thomas Verstraeten, a CDC expert on the issue.
When Verstraeten appeared before the committee, he made a surprise opening statement.
"First, I should mention that as of 8 a.m. European time I have been employed by a vaccine manufacturer," Verstraeten told the panel, according to a transcript. "That means since 2 a.m. American time," just hours before he spoke on behalf of the CDC.
Verstraeten had been working at the CDC on a study of 76,659 children to determine if thimerosal might be causing neurological problems like autism.
Signs of autism usually show up around age 2. Sometimes children who had previously appeared to interact normally will suddenly regress, become withdrawn and stop responding to their parents and the outside world. They may perform repetitive motions, like spinning or flapping their arms, have seizures, scream uncontrollably and resist physical touch.
Manufacturers had used thimerosal, which contains ethyl-mercury, as a preservative in multi-dose vials of vaccine. The vials allow needles to be inserted repeatedly and the vaccine drawn out. The vials are cheaper than packaging doses of vaccine separately, without thimerosal.
Depending on what vaccines a child got during that period, a visit to the doctor during the 1990's may have exposed some children to 125 times the limit on mercury set by the Environmental Protection Agency.
A February 2000 draft of Verstraeten's study, obtained by United Press International, appears to show that thimerosal might cause brain problems.
That draft cites "increasing risks of neurological developmental disorders with increasing cumulative exposure to thimerosal."
"We can state that this analysis does not rule out that receipt of thimerosal-containing vaccine in children under 3 months of age may be related to an increased risk of neurologic developmental disorders," the study said.
To discuss the findings in Verstraeten's study, the CDC convened a meeting at the Simpsonwood Retreat Center in Norcross, Ga., on June 7-8, 2000. The agency invited vaccine experts and representatives of four vaccine manufacturers.
After discussing that study, Dr. David Johnson, a Michigan state public health officer advising the CDC on vaccines, said that the findings were troubling, according to a transcript.
"My gut feeling? It worries me enough," said Johnson. "I do not want (my) grandson to get a thimerosal-containing vaccine until we know better what is going on."
Later in the same conversation, CDC officials agreed to keep the study private.
"We have been privileged so far that given the sensitivity of information, we have been able to manage to keep it out of, let's say, less responsible hands," said Bob Chen, head of CDC's Vaccine Safety and Development unit.
Dr. Roger Bernier, who was then CDC's associate director for science, responded, "I think if we will all just consider this embargoed information, if I can use that term."
The CDC's Walter Orenstein said the agency wanted to look hard at the study before discussing it in public, not cover it up. The CDC never published a study based on the data, but said it would soon.
GlaxoSmithKline declined UPI's request to interview Verstraeten from Rixensart, Belgium, but Orenstein said Verstraeten left the CDC to move back to Europe.
For Lara Bono of Durham, N.C., the connection between vaccines with thimerosal and her son's autism is obvious.
Bono said her son Jackson began to change drastically within days of receiving a group of thimerosal-containing vaccinations.
Bono says that on Aug. 14, 1990, four days after receiving the last of a group of shots, 16-month-old Jackson was becoming withdrawn. Within two weeks he stopped responding or acknowledging his parents. Two weeks after that Jackson no longer would make eye contact. It soon became difficult to get Jackson to eat or sleep. He has had bouts of spinning uncontrollably and seizures.
"Fast forward another couple of months and he was gone. The mercury was in his brain," Bono said.
Years later, Bono discovered that at one point, Jackson's mercury exposure may have been more than 40 times the limit set by the EPA. Nine years later, Bono says, Jackson was diagnosed with mercury poisoning she says came from the vaccines.
Boyd Haley, chairman of the Chemistry Department at the University of Kentucky, has done studies that he says show some children with autism do not excrete harmful mercury from vaccines, but keep it in their bodies. He says the CDC knows the vaccines the agency recommended may have harmed a generation of children.
"I know that they know and that is what bothers me more than anything else," Haley said. "You can't do a study showing it (thimerosal) is safe. It is just too damn toxic."
Yet it's ok to put in Vaccines used to babies... CDG
In June of 2000, the agency's Vaccine Advisory Committee signed on to a statement calling for the removal of thimerosal from vaccines "because any potential risk from mercury is of concern."
"However, there remains no convincing evidence of harm caused by low levels of thimerosal in vaccines," the statement said.
In October 2001, the Institute of Medicine panel that heard from Verstraeten found that it is "biologically plausible" that thimerosal causes autism, but that, "current scientific evidence neither proves nor disproves a link."
To avoid any conflict of interest, that panel specifically excludes "anyone who had participated in research on vaccine safety, received funding from vaccine manufacturers or their parent companies, or served on Vaccine Advisory Committees."
Laid low by Lyme vaccine
The rotavirus recommendation is not the only controversial call made by the CDC. Another involves a vaccine to fight Lyme disease, a tick-borne illness that can cause profound fatigue, headache, fever and severe muscle pain.
"It was after the booster shot that I absolutely collapsed," said Lewis Bull, a farmer from East Lyme, Conn. Bull, now 49, volunteered in 1996 to take shots during a clinical study for a new vaccine to prevent Lyme disease developed by SmithKline Beecham, now GlaxoSmithKline. Clinical studies are tests on humans to make sure vaccines are safe and work before going on the market.
In the study, Bull first received placebo shots containing no vaccine and felt fine.
But soon after his second shot of the real vaccine he began to suffer from debilitating arthritis, memory loss and fatigue. Some doctors believe the Lyme vaccine side effects mirror the disease itself.
"For the first six months I could not get out of bed. The memory loss was incredible. I've played guitar all my life and I could not remember how to play guitar. I could not find the town hall and I used to go there four times a week," he said in a recent telephone interview.
Bull said his fatigue was so severe he would sleep for stretches of 22 hours or more. Without medical insurance, Bull was forced to sell his farm.
On Feb. 18, 1999, the CDC endorsed Lyme disease vaccine for people age 15-70 who work or recreate in possible tick-infested areas.
By October of 2000, more than 1.4 million people had received the vaccine, according to the CDC.
But 19 months later, in February 2002, SmithKline Beecham pulled the vaccine off the market because "sales of LYMERIX are insufficient to justify the continued investment."
The company also faced hundreds lawsuits by people who said they suffered side effects, many similar to Lewis Bull's.
Although he never sued, Bull said he complained to the CDC to report what he says were obvious side effects from the vaccine, called LYMERIX.
The government's database of possible side effects for LYMERIX lists 640 emergency room visits, 34 life-threatening reactions, 77 hospitalizations, 198 disabilities and six deaths after people took the shots since the CDC endorsed it.
According to CDC meeting transcripts where the advisory committee weighed its recommendation, five of 10 committee members disclosed their financial conflicts of interest with vaccine manufactures. Three of the five had conflicts of interest with SmithKlineBeecham.
The committee ignored a plea from a consumer advocate to delay a recommendation on LYMERIX because it might not be safe, according to a February 1999 transcript.
"We are just saying there is a wealth of information out there that is different than the information you have been provided. I think the honorable thing to do would be to wait," said Karen Vanderhoof-Forschner, founder of the Lyme Disease Foundation, a patient's advocacy group that eventually opposed the vaccine.
UPI found that the CDC and SmithKline Beecham worked together on a Lyme vaccine. A 1992 CDC activity report obtained by UPI says the agency had an agreement "with SmithKline Beecham that currently funds three positions at (the CDC) for the purpose of providing information of use in developing advanced test methods and vaccine candidates."
In June 2001, the General Accounting Office delivered a report to Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., on this issue. It says that CDC employees "are listed on two Lyme-disease related patents" including "a 1993 joint patent between CDC and SmithKline Beecham Corporation." The report also said that six of 12 consultants working for the CDC on Lyme vaccines "reported at least one interest related to a vaccine firm."
Do babies need Hep B?
In 1991 the CDC recommended that all infants get their first Hepatitis B vaccination just hours after birth. The disease is mostly spread from dirty needles and unprotected sex. It can create deadly liver disease.
The vaccine has been blamed for mysterious deaths following the shots, sometimes filed as sudden infant death syndrome.
One is the Sept. 16, 1998, death of Lyla Rose Belkin at age 5 weeks. She died 15 hours after getting her second Hepatitis B vaccine booster shot.
Michael Belkin said in a telephone interview from Seattle that his daughter was lively and alert prior to receiving the shot. She became agitated and noisy, suddenly fell asleep, and died 15 hours later. Belkin said the coroner indicated that his daughter's brain was swollen; a reaction some researchers believe could be caused by the vaccine.
"So in the CDC and (the Vaccine Advisory Committee's) own words, almost every newborn U.S. baby is now greeted on its entry into the world by a vaccine injection against a sexually transmitted disease for which the baby is not at risk -- because they couldn't get the junkies, prostitutes, homosexuals and promiscuous heterosexuals to take the vaccine," Belkin told a congressional panel on May 18, 1999.
"Parents need to understand that the system providing the vaccines injected into their children's veins is corrupt and scientifically flawed," Belkin told UPI. "Parents should do their own homework and investigate this question: What is the risk of getting a severe neurological vaccine adverse reaction versus the risk of getting neurological complications from the disease?"
The CDC's files contain 32,731 total reports of possible reactions following Hepatitis B vaccinations since 1991, including 10,915 emergency room visits, 685 life-threatening reactions, 3,700 hospitalizations, 1,200 disabilities and 618 deaths.
In October 2002, the Institute of Medicine reported that the "evidence is inadequate" to prove or disprove that some vaccines might be behind some cases of SIDS, and called for more research.
The CDC says, "There is no confirmed evidence which indicates that hepatitis B vaccine can cause chronic illnesses."
Some of the officials involved in the agency's 1991 decision to recommend that all infants receive the Hepatitis B vaccine also had close ties to vaccine manufacturers.
Dr. Sam Katz was the advisory committee chairman at the time. A professor at Duke, Katz said 30 percent of children who get the disease get it from unknown causes, possibly in daycare.
He said the CDC tried to give the shots to teens, but it was hard to get them to show up for all three doses.
"So they said, 'Well, we've got a captive audience and we want to give it to the newborns anyways.'"
Katz developed a measles vaccine now manufactured by Merck, which also manufactures a Hepatitis B vaccine. Katz said when he was chairman of the committee in 1991 he also worked as a paid consultant for Merck, Wyeth and most major vaccine manufacturers.
He said conflicts do not pose a real problem.
"I think it has increasingly become a problem, but it is a perceived problem, not a real problem," Katz said.
Another member of the committee in 1991 was Dr. Neal Halsey, director of the division of disease control at Johns Hopkins University. He continued to advise the committee throughout the rest of that decade, as did Katz.
Halsey is a former CDC employee who has done research paid for by most of the major vaccine manufacturers. When he testified before the House Government Reform Committee in 1999, he disclosed a salary at that time for work on a Lyme vaccine.
He also established the Johns Hopkins Institute for Vaccine Safety, started in part with "unrestricted educational grants in 1997 from several vaccine manufacturers and some private donations," according to Halsey. Congressional investigators said that support included $50,000 in start-up funds from Merck and a payment from Wyeth. Halsey said vaccine manufacturers do not fund the center's vaccine education activities.
Halsey said the CDC needs experts like him to get the best advice.
"In order to get the people with experience, you need people who have done the research," Halsey said in a telephone interview. "To do that, you have to have people who have done research for vaccine manufacturers."
Halsey said, however, that the CDC should not recommend vaccines and evaluate safety at the same time.
"I think it is a problem and I think it would be better if an independent body evaluated safety," Halsey said.
http://www.upi.com/print.cfm?StoryID=20030718-012134-4422r
=============================================
News@nvic.org is a free service of the National Vaccine Information Center and is supported through membership donations. Learn more about vaccines, diseases and how to protect your informed consent rights http://www.nvic.orgE-NEWS FROM THE NATIONAL VACCINE INFORMATION CENTER
Vienna, Virginia http://www.nvic.org* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
UNITED WAY/COMBINED FEDERAL CAMPAIGN
#9119
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *"Protecting the health and informed consent rights of children since
1982."Become a member and support NVIC's work
https://www.909shot.com/Making%20Cash%20Donations.htmTo sign up for a free e-mail subscription
http://www.nvic.org/emaillist.htmNVIC is funded through individual membership donations and does not
receive government funding. Barbara Loe Fisher, President and Co-founder.
NOTE: This is not an interactive e-mail list. Please do not respond to
messages.
posted by Chris Gupta on Sunday August 3 2003
updated on Saturday September 24 2005URL of this article:
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/2003/08/03/upi_investigates_the_vaccine_conflict.htm
Related ArticlesVaccinations - Share The Wealth
Self-Sufficiency Is The Key To Empowerment And Freedom
Share The Wealth News Blog
Site Map
See also:
Communication Agents:
Ivan Ingrilli Sepp Hasslberger Tom Atlee Emma Holister Rinaldo Lampis Steve Bosserman CA Journal
Robin Good's
Web sites:
Vaccinations
May 28, 2008Bills C-51 & C-52 Example letters
Here are a couple of letters that you can adapt and paste in the left hand side of Health Canada Abuse site to send to your representatives. Here is an extract from the site:
Harper & Cabinet Ministers
Standing Committee of Health
Canadian Senators
Canadian Members of Parliament
Conservative MPs
Liberal MPs
NDP MPs
BLOC MPs
Independent MPs The current Status for Bill C-51 is here and for C-52 is here.
Chris Gupta
-------------------------
Note:To make this more effective try to do all: write, fax, email*, print out the petition and send it by snail mail, and/or telephone your representative directly and don't forget to be persistent! Clearly emphasizing the extreme importance to you in your note. Many MPs like mine often state that they are not able to study the issue and rely on party line supported by some regulatory body or such. Please ensure you state as your elected represent it is their duty to represent you. Ambiguity needs to be avoided at all cost. Please be creative, articulate and direct to the point. Send follow up letter and/or fax, phone and keep demanding a response on how and what they will actually do to mitigate concerns outlined. CG
------------------------------------------Dear Sue, (Barnes.S@parl.gc.ca)
From what are the Natural Health Product Regulations, Bills C-51 and C-52 actually protecting us?
They clearly target Natural Health Products (NHP), such as Dietary Food Supplements / Holistic Traditional Health Care Products, regardless of origin. Health Canada is currently denying approvals for more than half of the perfectly safe nutritional products it has reviewed. Implementation of C-51 will criminalize their sale and use to an unprecedented degree. We will not even be allowed to give a product to anyone, as this is now considered tantamount to making a sale and this includes parents giving the product to their children.
The excuse that the use of NHP to prevent the use of "proper medical care" and are being used to scam the public is absurd -- coming as it does from those who create a swath of drug-induced "iatrogenic" disease and death. Not to mention Health Canada's failure to protect Canadians from such a system.
People would not be turning to non-drug and "non-standard" health solutions -- if the essentially-free, publicly-insured "proper medical care" really worked. It's because of the medical system's failure to cure "chronic" disease and the massive adverse reactions and deaths that Canadians are voting with their pocketbooks for other approaches.
From the point of view of the patients (aka consumers), it is the medical-drug system that is not safe and effective. It's little better than an expensive scam, as all it does is create and manage diseases, instead of preventing and/or curing them! So why does Health Canada continually choose to ignore the daily carnage from "proper medical care" system?On March 9, 2005 in Parliament, MP Colin Carrie stated that just allergies from peanuts alone result in approximately 5 to 10 deaths in Canada each year. By comparison, since 1960 not one death in Canada has been attributed to a natural health product. Nothing else -- not food, and certainly not pharmaceuticals -- can brag of such a safety record!
So where is the the government's evidence-based data of death and adverse reactions to justify the extreme federal interventions showing harm? It is not ordinary citizens who are clamouring and demanding protection from safe and effective nutrients, but the "competitors" who are selling unsafe and intolerable products -- such as cancer drugs so horrific that an eleven-year-old boy is unable to endure a repetition of the treatment and begs to be allowed to die in peace.
Continue reading "Bills C-51 & C-52 Example letters"
posted by Chris Gupta on Wednesday May 28 2008
Permalink | Comments (1) | No trackbacks
Trackback link: http://communicationagents.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.r484.cgi/2434
January 14, 2008Dr. Carley's comments to PBS re: Autism, ADHD, Vaccinations...
"ADD & ADHD are primarily a result of vaccinations"
Further to: Vaccines Often The Cause of "Multiple Sclerosis & Other DEMYELINATING Diseases" here is another excellent response to junk health PBS programs of late.
"All are sponsored by the same cabal* who brought you this disease via the nutrient depleted, addictive and toxic chemical added processed foods; surgeries; and last but not least the supposed magic of generally toxic vaccines and drugs."
Extracted from: PBS' Hidden Epidemic: Heart Disease in America - More Pabulum For The Masses
Chris Gupta
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rukshana Engineer
Date: Jan 13, 2008 9:31 PM
Subject: VIDS (Vaccine Induced Diseases) Expert, Dr. Carley's comments to PBS re. . . .Just thought I'd share with you the comments forwarded to PBS by Dr. Carley. I'm sure it will be the first time that these researched challenged producers have seen the term VIDS!
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: drcarley@gmail.com
To: "Rukshana Engineer"
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:40:21 -0500
Subject: Re: Thank you for your urgent wake up call to humanity and . . .This is what I sent; let me know if it actually gets posted:
ADD & ADHD are primarily a result of vaccinations; and the skyrocketing number of autoimmune diseases and cancer are also caused by the corruption in the immune system caused by direct inoculation of viruses and the tissues on which they are cultured as well as a cocktail of harmful chemicals as explained in my paper "Inoculations; the true weapons of mass destruction" that can be accessed at www.drcarley.com. Obviously, poor nutrition is also directly involved in causing hyperactivity; sugar is an addictive drug.
For young children who have not even developed their brains to be put on psychotropic chemicals which purport to treat a "chemical imbalance" is the height of lunacy, and exhibit A as to how the pharma cartels continue to poison the population. Is ADD due to a Ritalin deficiency? Obviously not.
The American public is one of the sickest on this planet, with escalating chronic disease and death secondary to medical "treatment". There are natural solutions to all diseases, which is why our "representatives" in the district of criminals have passed Codex legislation, and are incrementally trying to make nutritional supplements in therapeutic doses available only by prescription. The pharma cartels completely control medical education; and any physician who steps out of the box and actually heals people is attacked by what has become a medical mafia.
Rebecca Carley, MD
Court Qualified expert in VIDS (Vaccine Induced Diseases)
www.drcarley.comListen to "What's Ailing America?" every Thursday night at 5:00 PM PST (8:00 PM EST) on www.bbsradio.com; click on "BBS station 2"
"Inoculations are the true weapons of mass destruction, causing an epidemic of genocide" Rebecca Carley, MD Court Qualified Expert in vaccine Induced Diseases
"The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous that he cannot believe it exists"
J Edgar Hoover
FBI DirectorAll TRUTH passes through 3 stages:
1st - it is ridiculed
2nd - it is violently opposed
3rd - it is accepted as SELF EVIDENT
Arthur SchopenhauerIn a time of universal deceit, telling the TRUTH is a revolutionary act.
1984, George Orwell
--------------------------
On 1/13/08, Rukshana Engineer wrote:
Dear Dr. Carley,
As someone who awoke to vaccine weapon of mass deception about 13 years ago, I cannot thank you enough for being a beacon of truth and courage in a sea of manipulation and lies.
Dr. Carley, I know you must be exceedingly busy but given your credentials I do hope that you can find a bit of time to submit your comments to the www.pbs.org re. their Frontline Show recently entitled 'The Medicated Child'. (Re. drugging "biopolar children" etc.) Needless to say none of the causes of neurlogical problems was addressed. Though I wrote in discussing vaccines as well as excitotoxins etc., I think someone introduced with your credentials will get a lot more attention from the producers than myself. Yes, we know that these people rarely think out of the box and are heavily invested in the vaccine dogma. Still, I think it's valuable or them to receive as many e-mails as possible re. vaccines. If you could pass this on to others willing to submit comments, it would be most appreciated.Thank you for your valuable time and for your powerful work taking on the criminal vaccine pushers!
Continue reading "Dr. Carley's comments to PBS re: Autism, ADHD, Vaccinations..."
Rukshana
posted by Chris Gupta on Monday January 14 2008
Permalink | Comments (2) | No trackbacks
Trackback link: http://communicationagents.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.r484.cgi/2392
May 29, 2007Re: Vaccines
At 02:16 PM 29/05/2007, you wrote:
Why do you lump all vaccines together as a category that is dangerous rather than treating them as individual cases? Is that a good way to find out if vaccines are dangerous in your opinion? Also, why would you trust eyewitness accounts rather than treat them with a well needed grain of salt? If I found eyewitness accounts that contradicted your opinion would you just as easily change your mind about the 1918 flu or are you going to be selective again, fooling yourself into actually being less intelligent? If you are a faculty member it wasn't achieved through critical analysis of any subject related to the natural sciences obviously. Your opinions are of similar value to someone who believes that the earth is 6,000 years old. Your knowledge of the world is clearly created by authority of the source not reason and analysis and testing. The latter isn't fool proof and today their are more sophisticated ways of reasoning. However, that would be a good start.Matthew Fuller
----------------------Thanks Matthew, for the feedback. I can understand your ire and concern, however, think it may be misplaced. In that all the things you are accusing me off should well be applicable to the mainstream medicine rather than someone like me. Unlike the vaccine pushers I do not get paid for a rigorous scientific approach that you suggest that I be mindful off and/or do. This job squarely falls under the auspicious of those whose job is exactly what you are asking me to do. This is what you find:
"off label applications of already inadequate and generally toxic drugs are being used villy nilly and the importance of nutrition is shoved under the rug while trials conducted on select populations are extrapolated to the untrialed populations including children and the elderly. Animal studies with totally different metabolisms are used as basis for humans without any human trials. The standards of testing from lab to lab differ often with no oversight. When only 6% of the drug advertising material is supported by evidence yet highly efficacious and often non palliative solutions based on nutrition, Orthomolecular, Oxidative and Electro medicine are routinely ignored while thousands continue to die and suffer. Any fool can see that majority of the diseases are due to a lack of nutrients. Yet the medical system behaves as though we have a deficiency of drugs. Not too bright - unless there are other agendas?"
Extracted from: Re: Feedback On Your Website
Do you really think that mainstream medicine evidence is really good scientific practice? See:
The Meningococcal Gold Rush - Pushing the Vaccine Agenda
Since you asked, here is some stuff right out of the mainstream texts clearly indicating how and why vaccines are known even to them to be dangerous:
Vaccines Often The Cause of "Multiple Sclerosis & Other DEMYELINATING Diseases"
Yet you and many professionals are totally oblivious - why?
If they are so safe and effective why this?
CODE RED Alert - U.S. Senate Bill Broadly Eliminates Liability For Vaccines And Drugs
and why the petition?
Petition - Show us the Vaccine Data
"The strange thing is that most of us will ignore massive side effects and deaths form conventional medicine but will not tolerate the slightest problem with alternative approaches"
Extracted from: Opinion of the Quackwatch site
My personal opinions are just that opinions and are not directives for others to follow. Rather they are simply fodder for thought and nothing more. Secondly those who have done their homework will quickly understand that vaccines are hardly the panacea that they have been made out to be. If you like please try to at least read some contrary information such as in the link below before swallowing the self serving mainstream junk science continually pushed on the unsuspecting. Then ask them for some real evidence of the efficacy of all the vaccines and other procedures they push. Given the lack of rigour in medical science in general how are you going to decipher the good from the bad?
Chris Gupta
posted by Chris Gupta on Tuesday May 29 2007
Permalink | Comments (1) | No trackbacks
Trackback link: http://communicationagents.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.r484.cgi/2326
May 18, 2007Improving Lung Function (COPD) - Oxygenation Benefits
Here are some very simple ways to improve lung function. There are many benefits to Oxygenating the body all the way from disease prevention to more energy. Not to mention a calmer disposition a hallmark of meditation. In particular, improving lung function for those with Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Asthma, Emphysema it can be a matter of life and death
Insufficient Oxygen means insufficient biological energy that can result in anything from mild fatigue to life threatening disease. Dr Otto Warburg, twice Nobel Laureate, was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1931 for discovering the cause of cancer. He said: "Cancer, above all other diseases, has countless secondary causes, but there is only one prime cause. Summary: the prime cause of cancer is the replacement of the normal oxygen respiration of the body cells by an anaerobic (i.e. lacking in Oxygen) cell respiration." In other words, the growth of cancer cells is initiated by a relative lack of Oxygen. Further lack of Oxygen can force the heart to compensate a most dangerous situation for an ailing heart....
Most of us tend to emphasize the inhalation phase of breathing and tend to neglect the exhalation phase. This deprives the lungs of their full potential to effectively exchange oxygen with carbon dioxide. Breathing exercises enforce good habits where the full range of lung function is used. Consequently, the body gets the oxygen it needs, this not only feels better, but provides more energy. In fact Yoga and other meditation methods often use techniques to enhance breathing. Hence exhaling deeply forces us to breath deeper thus increasing oxygen uptake exactly what we need!
A device similar to Spirometer discussed in "Breathing Training" below but far superior is the PowerLung. This as discussed above not only exercises inhalation muscles but also the exhalation ones thus, enhancing deeper breathing. A brief history of the device is here.
See also:
The effects of respiratory muscle training on older females.
Mark L. Watsford, Aron J. Murphy, Matthew J. Pine, Aaron J. Coutts. Human Performance Laboratory, University of Technology, Sydney.Resveratrol mist (a chemical found in red wine, grapes, olive oil) may have various health benefits, including possible protection of the lungs.
For a comprehensive look at the importance and benefits a read: "Flood Your Body With Oxygen Therapy for Our Polluted World" by "Mr. Oxygen" Ed McCabe
Chris Gupta
Note: Many articles regarding COPD on the web recommend vaccinations to prevent complications from lung infections. Contrary to the popular belief the flu vaccine can actually weaken the immune system and make you more predisposed to the illness.
The flu vaccine, whether in the shot or nasal form, is worthless at best and should be avoided. Not only are they loaded with toxic chemicals including mercury and aluminum, but many people come down with the flu shortly after receiving the shot. This is because it actually weakens the immune system, making the person more predisposed to the illness.
Launching a immune response among immune compromised will have the opposite effect particular in the an venerable groups such as the elderly and/or those who are nutritionally compromised
For more see: Should You Get The Flu Shot?
See also: Vaccines Often The Cause of "Multiple Sclerosis & Other DEMYELINATING Diseases"
CG
----------------
Breathing Exercises
Pursed-Lip Breathing. A technique called pursed-lip breathing can help improve lung function before starting activities. It takes about 10 minutes. When first learning the technique, the patient should lie flat on a bed with his or her head on a pillow. Later, the technique can be performed while walking or enduring any activity requiring extra air.
Continue reading "Improving Lung Function (COPD) - Oxygenation Benefits"
posted by Chris Gupta on Friday May 18 2007
Permalink | Comments (4) | No trackbacks
Trackback link: http://communicationagents.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.r484.cgi/2319
Bills C-51 & C-52 Example letters
May 28, 2008Dr. Carley's comments to PBS re: Autism, ADHD, Vaccinations...
January 14, 2008Re: Vaccines
May 29, 2007Improving Lung Function (COPD) - Oxygenation Benefits
May 18, 2007Vaccines Often The Cause of "Multiple Sclerosis & Other DEMYELINATING Diseases"
March 27, 2007The Flu: 1918 And Now
September 04, 2006Free Flu Vaccine - Fails To Reduce Cases: Waste Of Money In Ontario Since 2000
May 10, 2006Chickenpox Vaccine Doesn't Work
January 26, 2006Re: CDC-vaccinations DELAY ONLY ALLOWED IF....
January 18, 2006Questions About Avian Flu Or Any Expending Pandemic
November 28, 2005CODE RED Alert - U.S. Senate Bill Broadly Eliminates Liability For Vaccines And Drugs
October 19, 2005Vaccine Mongering - Will Government Experimentation Cause An Avian Flu Epidemic?
October 13, 2005More On Vaccine/Autism Connection
June 16, 2005Only Vaccinated Amish Children Are Autistic
April 22, 2005The Meningococcal Gold Rush - Pushing the Vaccine Agenda
March 01, 2005SARS Vaccine Linked To Liver Damage In Ferret Study
January 14, 2005Autism-Mercury Defence Restored by Nutritional Interventions
January 04, 2005TIME TO TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT VACCINATIONS
November 23, 2004Court Rules-No Forced Anthrax Vaccination
October 29, 2004Evidence Based Flu Vaccine - You Jest?
October 28, 2004Meningococcal Disease at 10 to 13 Year Lows - Yet The Vaccine Propaganda Continues
October 27, 2004VACCINE FOR MENINGITIS?
October 13, 2004Vaccine Shenanigans - Meningococcal Disease
October 12, 2004DR. COLETTE HARMAN ON HEPATITIS B VACCINE
September 30, 2004Cod Liver Oil to Heal Autism (Vaccinations)
September 20, 2004SOMETHING IS ROTTEN IN DENMARK
September 15, 2004MMR AND AUTISM: The link really has been established
September 14, 2004Petition - Show us the Vaccine Data
September 09, 2004Vaccine Data Leads to a Shocking Discovery
February 26, 2004Disease Reduction & Medicine
February 18, 2004Safe Vaccine Lawsuit? Hmm...
December 16, 2003Canned tuna or canned poison?
December 14, 2003Medical Liars - Vaccines
December 12, 2003Operation Cure.all -- Whose Cure?
December 11, 2003HAZARDS OF THE FLU VACCINE
December 10, 2003Drugs Do Not Work On Most Patients
December 09, 2003Re: Canadian Vaccine Laws
December 03, 2003Canadian Vaccine Laws
November 29, 2003FluMist vaccine
August 27, 2003"Uncle" says, "it´s good for you!"
August 04, 2003UPI Investigates: The vaccine conflict
August 03, 2003
A Person Is Only As Valuable As She Can Be Of Help To Others
Home | Site map | About | Contact
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.These articles are brought to you strictly for educational and informational purposes.
Be sure to consult your health practitioner of choice prior to any specific use of any of the non drug device or food based medicinal products referenced herein.The Ads are not a an endorsement of the webmasters or writers on this site and are simply a means to facilitate our ability bring you more information not generally available via mainstream media. You are encouraged to take matters in your own hands with the tools and ideas provided on this site and elsewhere.
