At 02:16 PM 29/05/2007, you wrote:
Why do you lump all vaccines together as a category that is dangerous rather than treating them as individual cases? Is that a good way to find out if vaccines are dangerous in your opinion? Also, why would you trust eyewitness accounts rather than treat them with a well needed grain of salt? If I found eyewitness accounts that contradicted your opinion would you just as easily change your mind about the 1918 flu or are you going to be selective again, fooling yourself into actually being less intelligent? If you are a faculty member it wasn't achieved through critical analysis of any subject related to the natural sciences obviously. Your opinions are of similar value to someone who believes that the earth is 6,000 years old. Your knowledge of the world is clearly created by authority of the source not reason and analysis and testing. The latter isn't fool proof and today their are more sophisticated ways of reasoning. However, that would be a good start.
Thanks Matthew, for the feedback. I can understand your ire and concern, however, think it may be misplaced. In that all the things you are accusing me off should well be applicable to the mainstream medicine rather than someone like me. Unlike the vaccine pushers I do not get paid for a rigorous scientific approach that you suggest that I be mindful off and/or do. This job squarely falls under the auspicious of those whose job is exactly what you are asking me to do. This is what you find:
"off label applications of already inadequate and generally toxic drugs are being used villy nilly and the importance of nutrition is shoved under the rug while trials conducted on select populations are extrapolated to the untrialed populations including children and the elderly. Animal studies with totally different metabolisms are used as basis for humans without any human trials. The standards of testing from lab to lab differ often with no oversight. When only 6% of the drug advertising material is supported by evidence yet highly efficacious and often non palliative solutions based on nutrition, Orthomolecular, Oxidative and Electro medicine are routinely ignored while thousands continue to die and suffer. Any fool can see that majority of the diseases are due to a lack of nutrients. Yet the medical system behaves as though we have a deficiency of drugs. Not too bright - unless there are other agendas?"
Extracted from: Re: Feedback On Your Website
Do you really think that mainstream medicine evidence is really good scientific practice? See:
Since you asked, here is some stuff right out of the mainstream texts clearly indicating how and why vaccines are known even to them to be dangerous:
Yet you and many professionals are totally oblivious - why?
If they are so safe and effective why this?
and why the petition?
"The strange thing is that most of us will ignore massive side effects and deaths form conventional medicine but will not tolerate the slightest problem with alternative approaches"
Extracted from: Opinion of the Quackwatch site
My personal opinions are just that opinions and are not directives for others to follow. Rather they are simply fodder for thought and nothing more. Secondly those who have done their homework will quickly understand that vaccines are hardly the panacea that they have been made out to be. If you like please try to at least read some contrary information such as in the link below before swallowing the self serving mainstream junk science continually pushed on the unsuspecting. Then ask them for some real evidence of the efficacy of all the vaccines and other procedures they push. Given the lack of rigour in medical science in general how are you going to decipher the good from the bad?
posted by Chris Gupta on Tuesday May 29 2007
URL of this article:
Bills C-51 & C-52 Example letters
Here are a couple of letters that you can adapt and paste in the left hand side of Health Canada Abuse site to send to your representatives. Here is an extract from the site: Harper & Cabinet Ministers Standing Committee of Health Canadian Senators Canadian Members of Parliament Conservative MPs Liberal MPs NDP MPs BLOC MPs Independent MPs The current Status for Bill C-51 is here and for C-52 is... [read more]
May 28, 2008 - Chris Gupta
Dr. Carley's comments to PBS re: Autism, ADHD, Vaccinations...
"ADD & ADHD are primarily a result of vaccinations" Further to: Vaccines Often The Cause of "Multiple Sclerosis & Other DEMYELINATING Diseases" here is another excellent response to junk health PBS programs of late. "All are sponsored by the same cabal* who brought you this disease via the nutrient depleted, addictive and toxic chemical added processed foods; surgeries; and last but not least the supposed magic of generally toxic vaccines... [read more]
January 14, 2008 - Chris Gupta
At 02:16 PM 29/05/2007, you wrote: Why do you lump all vaccines together as a category that is dangerous rather than treating them as individual cases? Is that a good way to find out if vaccines are dangerous in your opinion? Also, why would you trust eyewitness accounts rather than treat them with a well needed grain of salt? If I found eyewitness accounts that contradicted your opinion would you... [read more]
May 29, 2007 - Chris Gupta