Re: Canadian Vaccine Laws
At 10:39 AM 11/29/2003 -0800, you wrote:
Hello Chris.
According to an item in the Globe & Mail the province of Quebec is the only jurisdiction that compensates for vaccine induced injury (G&B, November 18/2002).
The other problem is that reporting adverse reactions to vaccines is not mandatory - what the medical establishment does not look for, it will not find. Then, of course there is their policy of research manipulation - see attachment.Croft
At 10:48 PM 28/11/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Like so many illegal things masquerading as legal, courtesy of vested interests, thought one should keep the following in mind when dealing with Draconian know it all authorities...[snip]
Chris Gupta
Canadian Vaccine Laws
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Alarming expose of research manipulation - A United States Congressman - who is also a medical doctor- expresses his concern by letter (at end). This should make everyone question what they are 'officially' toldTo those in government and the media whom it ought to concern:
The current flu vaccine now being flogged by the "health" authorities - with the help of a research challenged media - contains thimerosal 50% of which is comprised of the neurotoxin mercury, may or may not contain aluminum - also a neurotoxin, and formalin - a.k.a. formaldehyde (a known carcinogen and neurotoxin) and egg albumin (a potent allergen).
Those targeted with this vaccine include the elderly and the chronically ill. The immune system of the former is in decline and that of the latter is compromised. As a consequence both are highly vulnerable to adverse reactions caused by the toxins in these vaccines. The same holds true for infants whose immune systems are not fully developed or compromised because of genetic susceptibility or illness. Read the vaccine manufacturer's package insert for contraindications, side effects and the vaccine's contents.
Immuno-geneticist Dr. H. Hugh Fudenberg, MD (among the 15 most quoted scientists of this era with over 850 papers published in peer reviewed journals, http://www.nitrf.org/biblio.html , web site http://www.nitrf.org/fudenberg.html), in 1997 cited a ten year study conducted in the 1980's which demonstrated that those who have had five or more consecutive flu shots as opposed to one or two or no flu shots have a ten fold chance of developing Alzheimer's disease. Dr. Fudenberg attributed this to the mercury and aluminum that are present in these vaccines and until recently was present in most childhood vaccines.
See this below: "once Dr. Verstraeten began working for vaccine manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline, he altered the data, sampling and methodology of the study so that results would point to enough inconsistencies to cast doubt" on the (mercury/autism) link.
The medical profession may hide its head like the proverbial ostrich over the vaccine/autism connection. However, it will not escape the condemnation and loss of public trust for its attempts to hide the facts. The media will not escape excoriation for its lack of due diligence while acting as a handmaiden for government , the medial profession and the vaccine industry.
Croft Woodruff
6262-A Fraser Street
Vancouver BC V5W 3A1
604 327 3889
****************************************NVIC Note: The questions surrounding the latest study in Pediatrics claiming there is no link between thimerosal and autism has gotten a lot of attention in the media. Here is a report from The Washington Times. At the end of this article is a copy of the letter that Congressman Weldon sent to the Centers for Disease Control. If you have a child with autism and mercury poisoning, please contact your local media outlets and give them the letter from the Congressman. Tell them your personal story and experiences and ask them to cover this important issue.
Mercury-laced vaccines a threat, child group says
November 3, 2003
By Cheryl Wetzstein
THE WASHINGTON TIMESA vaccine safety study of more than 124,000 babies that appears today in the journal Pediatrics concludes there are "no consistent significant associations" between mercury-laced vaccines and maladies such as autism or attention-deficit disorder.
However, an advocacy group is accusing federal researchers of finding such a link in "earlier, secret studies" and "manipulating data" to cover it up.
"They found the truth and then swept it under the rug," said Lyn Redwood, the mother of an autistic child and president of Safe Minds, a Cranford, N.J., organization dedicated to removing mercury from medical products.
Mercury is known to have toxic effects on the brain. Thimerosal, a mercury-containing preservative, was used for decades to stabilize vaccines. Vaccines today contain little or no thimerosal.
Rep. Dave Weldon, Florida Republican and a physician, sent a letter Friday to Dr. Julie L. Gerberding, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), asking for a "thorough, open, timely and independent review" of the study.
"I have reviewed the [Pediatrics] article and have serious reservations about the four-year evaluation and conclusions of this study," Dr. Weldon said.
"While most childhood vaccines now have only trace amounts of mercury from thimerosal-containing vaccines, it is critical that we know with certainty if children were injured in the 1990s," he wrote.
"I am a strong supporter of childhood vaccinations, and know that they have saved us from considerable death and suffering," he added. However, "[W]e must fully disclose adverse events" to preserve public confidence in vaccines.
The CDC study, led by Dr. Thomas Verstraeten, was based on vaccine and health data from 124,170 infants born between 1992 and 1999 at two health maintenance organizations and 16,717 children born between 1991 and 1997 at another HMO.
The researchers found "conflicting results" about links between vaccines and tics or language delays at different sites. However, they found no evidence of significant increased risks for autism or attention-deficit disorder.
Safe Minds leaders say that, according to materials obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, Dr. Verstraeten said during the early stages of the study that he thought he saw a "plausible" link between thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism.
But, "once Dr. Verstraeten began working for vaccine manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline, he altered the data, sampling and methodology of the study so that results would point to enough inconsistencies to cast doubt" on the link, the group said.
Specifically, they said, CDC researchers added data from a Massachusetts HMO even though it had data-management problems and the state is believed to have "severely underreported" its cases of autism. This data skewed the findings, the Safe Minds leaders said. Spokesmen for the CDC said Friday they were reviewing information about these "serious allegations."
CDC materials say there are no proven links between autism and vaccines, and American parents and health care workers should continue to immunize babies and young children against disease.
A spokeswoman at GlaxoSmithKline referred questions about the study to the CDC, since it was conducted when Dr. Verstraeten was in an agency fellowship program.
GlaxoSmithKline is named as a defendant in lawsuits filed by persons with autism.
A spokeswoman for the Pediatrics journal said that the CDC study was "peer-reviewed by multiple experts." Also, Dr. Verstraeten declared that he was a federal employee and had no conflict of interest when the study was performed, the journal said.
You can view and print this letter as a .pdf here.
October 31, 2003Julie L. Gerberding, M.D., M.P.H.
Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
1600 Clifton Road, N.E.
Atlanta, GA 30333Dr. Julie Gerberding,
I am writing to follow up on our conversation about the article (Verstraeten et. al.,) that will be published in the November 2003 issue of Pediatrics. I have reviewed the article and have serious reservations about the four-year evolution and conclusions of this study.
Much of what I observed transpired prior to your appointment a year ago as the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). I am very concerned about activities that have taken place in the National Immunization Program (NIP) in the development of this study, and I believe the issues raised need your personal attention.
I am a strong supporter of childhood vaccinations and know that they have saved us from considerable death and suffering. A key part of our vaccination program is to ensure that we do everything possible to ensure that these vaccines, which are mandatory, are as safe as possible. We must fully disclose adverse events. Anything less than this undermines public confidence.
I have read the upcoming Pediatrics study and several earlier versions of this study dating back to February 2000. I have read various e-mails from Dr. Verstraeten and coauthors. I have reviewed the transcripts of a discussion at Simpsonwood, GA between the author, various CDC employees, and vaccine industry representatives. I found a disturbing pattern which merits a thorough, open, timely, and independent review by researchers outside of the CDC, HHS, the vaccine industry, and others with a conflict of interest in vaccine related issues (including many in University settings who may have conflicts).
A review of these documents leaves me very concerned that rather than seeking to understand whether or not some children were exposed to harmful levels of mercury in childhood vaccines in the 1990s, there may have been a selective use of the data to make the associations in the earliest study disappear. While most childhood vaccines now only have trace amounts of mercury from thimerosal containing vaccines (TCVs), it is critical that we know with certainty if children were injured in the 1990s.
Furthermore, the lead author of the article, Dr. Thomas Verstraeten, worked for the CDC until he left over two years ago to work in Belgium for GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), a vaccine manufacturer facing liability over TCVs. In violation of their own standards of conduct, Pediatrics failed to disclose that Dr. Verstraeten is employed by GSK and incorrectly identifies him as an employee of the CDC. This revelation undermines this study further.
The first version of the study, produced in February 2000, found a significant association between exposure to thimerosal containing vaccines (TCVs) and autism and neurological developmental delays (NDDs). When comparing children exposed to 62.5 µg of mercury by 3 months of age to those exposed to less than 37.5 µg, the study found a relative risk for autism of 2.48 for those with a higher exposure level. (While not significant in the 95% confidence interval for autism, this meets the legal standard of proof exceeding 2.0.) For NDDs the study found a relative risk of 1.59 and a definite upward trend as exposure levels increased.
A June 2000 version of the study applied various data manipulations to reduce the autism association to 1.69 and the authors went outside of the VSD database to secure data from a Massachusetts HMO (Harvard Pilgrim, HP) in order to counter the association found between TCVs and speech delay. At the time that HP's data was brought in, HP was in receivership by the state of Mass., its computer records had been in shambles for years, it had multiple computer systems that could not communicate with one another (Journal of Law, Ethics and Medicine Sept. 22, 2000), and it used a health care coding system totally different from the one used across the VSD. There are questions relating to a significant underreporting of Autism in Mass. The HP dataset is only about 15% of the HMO dataset used in the February 2000 study. There may also be significant problems with the statistical power of the HP dataset.
In June of 2000 a meeting was held in Simpsonwood, GA, involving the authors of the study, representatives of the CDC, and the vaccine industry. I have reviewed a transcript of this meeting that was obtained through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Comments from Simpsonwood, NJ meeting include: (summary form, not direct quotes):
We found a statistically significant relationship between exposures and outcomes. There is certainly an under ascertainment of adverse outcomes because some children are just simply not old enough to be diagnosed, the current incidence rates are much lower than we would expect to see (Verstraeten);
We could exclude the lowest exposure children from our database. Also suggested was removing the children that got the highest exposure levels since they represented an unusually high percentage of the outcomes. (Rhodes)
The significant association with language delay is quite large. (Verstraeten);
This information should be kept confidential and considered embargoed;
We can push and pull this data anyway we want to get the results we want;
We can alter the exclusion criteria any we way we want, give reasonable justifications for doing so, and get any result we want;
There was really no need to do this study. We could have predicted the outcomes;
I will not give TCVs to my grandson until I find out what is going on here.
Another version of the study - after further manipulation - finds no association between TCVs and autism, and no consistency across HMOs between TCVs and NDDs and speech delay.
The final version of the study concludes that "No consistent significant associations were found between TCVs and neurodevelopmental outcomes," and that the lack of consistency argues against an association. In reviewing the study there are data points where children with higherexposures to the neuortoxin mercury had fewer developmental disorders. This demonstrates to me how excessive manipulation of data can lead to absurd results. Such a conclusion is not unexpected from an author with a serious, though undisclosed, conflict of interest.
This study increases speculation of an association between TCVs and neurodevelopmental outcomes. I cannot say it was the author's intent to eliminate the earlier findings of an association. Nonetheless, the elimination of this association is exactly what happened and the manner in which this was achieved raises speculation. The dialogue at the Simpsonwood meeting clearly indicates how easily the authors could manipulate the data and have reasonable sounding justifications for many of their decisions.
The only way these issues are going to be resolved - and I have only mentioned a few of them - is by making this particular dataset and the entire VSD database open for independent analysis. One such independent researcher, Dr. Mark Geier, has already been approved by the CDC and the various IRBs to access this dataset. They have requested the CDC allow them to access this dataset and your staff indicated to my office that they would make this particular dataset available after the Pediatrics study is published.
Earlier this month the CDC had prepared three similar datasets for this researcher to review to allow him to reanalyze CDC study datasets. However when they accessed the datasets - which the researchers paid the CDC to assemble - the datasets were found to have no usable data in them. I request that you personally intervene with those in the CDC who are assembling this dataset to ensure that they provide the complete dataset, in a usable format, to these researchers within two weeks. The treatment that these well-published researchers have received from the CDC thus far has been abysmal and embarrassing. I would also be curious to know whether Dr. Verstraeten, an outside researcher for more than two years now, was required to go through the same process as Dr. Geier in order to continue accessing the VSD.
You have not been a part of creating this current situation, but you do have an opportunity to help resolve this issue and ensure that confidence and trustworthiness in the CDC and our national vaccination program is fully restored. I would ask that you work with me to ensure that a full, fair, and independent review is made of the VSD database to fully examine this matter. I would like to meet with you at your earliest convenience to move this process forward.
Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to working with you on this urgent matter of great importance to our nation's most precious resource, our children.
Sincerely,
Dave Weldon, M.D.
Member of CongressSee also: Flu shots - how useful are they?
posted by Chris Gupta on Wednesday December 3 2003
updated on Saturday September 24 2005URL of this article:
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/2003/12/03/re_canadian_vaccine_laws.htm
Related ArticlesVaccinations - Share The Wealth
Self-Sufficiency Is The Key To Empowerment And Freedom
Share The Wealth News Blog
Site Map
See also:
Communication Agents:
Ivan Ingrilli Sepp Hasslberger Tom Atlee Emma Holister Rinaldo Lampis Steve Bosserman CA Journal
Robin Good's
Web sites:
Vaccinations
May 28, 2008Bills C-51 & C-52 Example letters
Here are a couple of letters that you can adapt and paste in the left hand side of Health Canada Abuse site to send to your representatives. Here is an extract from the site:
Harper & Cabinet Ministers
Standing Committee of Health
Canadian Senators
Canadian Members of Parliament
Conservative MPs
Liberal MPs
NDP MPs
BLOC MPs
Independent MPs The current Status for Bill C-51 is here and for C-52 is here.
Chris Gupta
-------------------------
Note:To make this more effective try to do all: write, fax, email*, print out the petition and send it by snail mail, and/or telephone your representative directly and don't forget to be persistent! Clearly emphasizing the extreme importance to you in your note. Many MPs like mine often state that they are not able to study the issue and rely on party line supported by some regulatory body or such. Please ensure you state as your elected represent it is their duty to represent you. Ambiguity needs to be avoided at all cost. Please be creative, articulate and direct to the point. Send follow up letter and/or fax, phone and keep demanding a response on how and what they will actually do to mitigate concerns outlined. CG
------------------------------------------Dear Sue, (Barnes.S@parl.gc.ca)
From what are the Natural Health Product Regulations, Bills C-51 and C-52 actually protecting us?
They clearly target Natural Health Products (NHP), such as Dietary Food Supplements / Holistic Traditional Health Care Products, regardless of origin. Health Canada is currently denying approvals for more than half of the perfectly safe nutritional products it has reviewed. Implementation of C-51 will criminalize their sale and use to an unprecedented degree. We will not even be allowed to give a product to anyone, as this is now considered tantamount to making a sale and this includes parents giving the product to their children.
The excuse that the use of NHP to prevent the use of "proper medical care" and are being used to scam the public is absurd -- coming as it does from those who create a swath of drug-induced "iatrogenic" disease and death. Not to mention Health Canada's failure to protect Canadians from such a system.
People would not be turning to non-drug and "non-standard" health solutions -- if the essentially-free, publicly-insured "proper medical care" really worked. It's because of the medical system's failure to cure "chronic" disease and the massive adverse reactions and deaths that Canadians are voting with their pocketbooks for other approaches.
From the point of view of the patients (aka consumers), it is the medical-drug system that is not safe and effective. It's little better than an expensive scam, as all it does is create and manage diseases, instead of preventing and/or curing them! So why does Health Canada continually choose to ignore the daily carnage from "proper medical care" system?On March 9, 2005 in Parliament, MP Colin Carrie stated that just allergies from peanuts alone result in approximately 5 to 10 deaths in Canada each year. By comparison, since 1960 not one death in Canada has been attributed to a natural health product. Nothing else -- not food, and certainly not pharmaceuticals -- can brag of such a safety record!
So where is the the government's evidence-based data of death and adverse reactions to justify the extreme federal interventions showing harm? It is not ordinary citizens who are clamouring and demanding protection from safe and effective nutrients, but the "competitors" who are selling unsafe and intolerable products -- such as cancer drugs so horrific that an eleven-year-old boy is unable to endure a repetition of the treatment and begs to be allowed to die in peace.
Continue reading "Bills C-51 & C-52 Example letters"
posted by Chris Gupta on Wednesday May 28 2008
Permalink | Comments (1) | No trackbacks
Trackback link: http://communicationagents.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.r484.cgi/2434
January 14, 2008Dr. Carley's comments to PBS re: Autism, ADHD, Vaccinations...
"ADD & ADHD are primarily a result of vaccinations"
Further to: Vaccines Often The Cause of "Multiple Sclerosis & Other DEMYELINATING Diseases" here is another excellent response to junk health PBS programs of late.
"All are sponsored by the same cabal* who brought you this disease via the nutrient depleted, addictive and toxic chemical added processed foods; surgeries; and last but not least the supposed magic of generally toxic vaccines and drugs."
Extracted from: PBS' Hidden Epidemic: Heart Disease in America - More Pabulum For The Masses
Chris Gupta
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rukshana Engineer
Date: Jan 13, 2008 9:31 PM
Subject: VIDS (Vaccine Induced Diseases) Expert, Dr. Carley's comments to PBS re. . . .Just thought I'd share with you the comments forwarded to PBS by Dr. Carley. I'm sure it will be the first time that these researched challenged producers have seen the term VIDS!
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: drcarley@gmail.com
To: "Rukshana Engineer"
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:40:21 -0500
Subject: Re: Thank you for your urgent wake up call to humanity and . . .This is what I sent; let me know if it actually gets posted:
ADD & ADHD are primarily a result of vaccinations; and the skyrocketing number of autoimmune diseases and cancer are also caused by the corruption in the immune system caused by direct inoculation of viruses and the tissues on which they are cultured as well as a cocktail of harmful chemicals as explained in my paper "Inoculations; the true weapons of mass destruction" that can be accessed at www.drcarley.com. Obviously, poor nutrition is also directly involved in causing hyperactivity; sugar is an addictive drug.
For young children who have not even developed their brains to be put on psychotropic chemicals which purport to treat a "chemical imbalance" is the height of lunacy, and exhibit A as to how the pharma cartels continue to poison the population. Is ADD due to a Ritalin deficiency? Obviously not.
The American public is one of the sickest on this planet, with escalating chronic disease and death secondary to medical "treatment". There are natural solutions to all diseases, which is why our "representatives" in the district of criminals have passed Codex legislation, and are incrementally trying to make nutritional supplements in therapeutic doses available only by prescription. The pharma cartels completely control medical education; and any physician who steps out of the box and actually heals people is attacked by what has become a medical mafia.
Rebecca Carley, MD
Court Qualified expert in VIDS (Vaccine Induced Diseases)
www.drcarley.comListen to "What's Ailing America?" every Thursday night at 5:00 PM PST (8:00 PM EST) on www.bbsradio.com; click on "BBS station 2"
"Inoculations are the true weapons of mass destruction, causing an epidemic of genocide" Rebecca Carley, MD Court Qualified Expert in vaccine Induced Diseases
"The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous that he cannot believe it exists"
J Edgar Hoover
FBI DirectorAll TRUTH passes through 3 stages:
1st - it is ridiculed
2nd - it is violently opposed
3rd - it is accepted as SELF EVIDENT
Arthur SchopenhauerIn a time of universal deceit, telling the TRUTH is a revolutionary act.
1984, George Orwell
--------------------------
On 1/13/08, Rukshana Engineer wrote:
Dear Dr. Carley,
As someone who awoke to vaccine weapon of mass deception about 13 years ago, I cannot thank you enough for being a beacon of truth and courage in a sea of manipulation and lies.
Dr. Carley, I know you must be exceedingly busy but given your credentials I do hope that you can find a bit of time to submit your comments to the www.pbs.org re. their Frontline Show recently entitled 'The Medicated Child'. (Re. drugging "biopolar children" etc.) Needless to say none of the causes of neurlogical problems was addressed. Though I wrote in discussing vaccines as well as excitotoxins etc., I think someone introduced with your credentials will get a lot more attention from the producers than myself. Yes, we know that these people rarely think out of the box and are heavily invested in the vaccine dogma. Still, I think it's valuable or them to receive as many e-mails as possible re. vaccines. If you could pass this on to others willing to submit comments, it would be most appreciated.Thank you for your valuable time and for your powerful work taking on the criminal vaccine pushers!
Continue reading "Dr. Carley's comments to PBS re: Autism, ADHD, Vaccinations..."
Rukshana
posted by Chris Gupta on Monday January 14 2008
Permalink | Comments (2) | No trackbacks
Trackback link: http://communicationagents.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.r484.cgi/2392
May 29, 2007Re: Vaccines
At 02:16 PM 29/05/2007, you wrote:
Why do you lump all vaccines together as a category that is dangerous rather than treating them as individual cases? Is that a good way to find out if vaccines are dangerous in your opinion? Also, why would you trust eyewitness accounts rather than treat them with a well needed grain of salt? If I found eyewitness accounts that contradicted your opinion would you just as easily change your mind about the 1918 flu or are you going to be selective again, fooling yourself into actually being less intelligent? If you are a faculty member it wasn't achieved through critical analysis of any subject related to the natural sciences obviously. Your opinions are of similar value to someone who believes that the earth is 6,000 years old. Your knowledge of the world is clearly created by authority of the source not reason and analysis and testing. The latter isn't fool proof and today their are more sophisticated ways of reasoning. However, that would be a good start.Matthew Fuller
----------------------Thanks Matthew, for the feedback. I can understand your ire and concern, however, think it may be misplaced. In that all the things you are accusing me off should well be applicable to the mainstream medicine rather than someone like me. Unlike the vaccine pushers I do not get paid for a rigorous scientific approach that you suggest that I be mindful off and/or do. This job squarely falls under the auspicious of those whose job is exactly what you are asking me to do. This is what you find:
"off label applications of already inadequate and generally toxic drugs are being used villy nilly and the importance of nutrition is shoved under the rug while trials conducted on select populations are extrapolated to the untrialed populations including children and the elderly. Animal studies with totally different metabolisms are used as basis for humans without any human trials. The standards of testing from lab to lab differ often with no oversight. When only 6% of the drug advertising material is supported by evidence yet highly efficacious and often non palliative solutions based on nutrition, Orthomolecular, Oxidative and Electro medicine are routinely ignored while thousands continue to die and suffer. Any fool can see that majority of the diseases are due to a lack of nutrients. Yet the medical system behaves as though we have a deficiency of drugs. Not too bright - unless there are other agendas?"
Extracted from: Re: Feedback On Your Website
Do you really think that mainstream medicine evidence is really good scientific practice? See:
The Meningococcal Gold Rush - Pushing the Vaccine Agenda
Since you asked, here is some stuff right out of the mainstream texts clearly indicating how and why vaccines are known even to them to be dangerous:
Vaccines Often The Cause of "Multiple Sclerosis & Other DEMYELINATING Diseases"
Yet you and many professionals are totally oblivious - why?
If they are so safe and effective why this?
CODE RED Alert - U.S. Senate Bill Broadly Eliminates Liability For Vaccines And Drugs
and why the petition?
Petition - Show us the Vaccine Data
"The strange thing is that most of us will ignore massive side effects and deaths form conventional medicine but will not tolerate the slightest problem with alternative approaches"
Extracted from: Opinion of the Quackwatch site
My personal opinions are just that opinions and are not directives for others to follow. Rather they are simply fodder for thought and nothing more. Secondly those who have done their homework will quickly understand that vaccines are hardly the panacea that they have been made out to be. If you like please try to at least read some contrary information such as in the link below before swallowing the self serving mainstream junk science continually pushed on the unsuspecting. Then ask them for some real evidence of the efficacy of all the vaccines and other procedures they push. Given the lack of rigour in medical science in general how are you going to decipher the good from the bad?
Chris Gupta
posted by Chris Gupta on Tuesday May 29 2007
Permalink | Comments (1) | No trackbacks
Trackback link: http://communicationagents.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.r484.cgi/2326
May 18, 2007Improving Lung Function (COPD) - Oxygenation Benefits
Here are some very simple ways to improve lung function. There are many benefits to Oxygenating the body all the way from disease prevention to more energy. Not to mention a calmer disposition a hallmark of meditation. In particular, improving lung function for those with Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Asthma, Emphysema it can be a matter of life and death
Insufficient Oxygen means insufficient biological energy that can result in anything from mild fatigue to life threatening disease. Dr Otto Warburg, twice Nobel Laureate, was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1931 for discovering the cause of cancer. He said: "Cancer, above all other diseases, has countless secondary causes, but there is only one prime cause. Summary: the prime cause of cancer is the replacement of the normal oxygen respiration of the body cells by an anaerobic (i.e. lacking in Oxygen) cell respiration." In other words, the growth of cancer cells is initiated by a relative lack of Oxygen. Further lack of Oxygen can force the heart to compensate a most dangerous situation for an ailing heart....
Most of us tend to emphasize the inhalation phase of breathing and tend to neglect the exhalation phase. This deprives the lungs of their full potential to effectively exchange oxygen with carbon dioxide. Breathing exercises enforce good habits where the full range of lung function is used. Consequently, the body gets the oxygen it needs, this not only feels better, but provides more energy. In fact Yoga and other meditation methods often use techniques to enhance breathing. Hence exhaling deeply forces us to breath deeper thus increasing oxygen uptake exactly what we need!
A device similar to Spirometer discussed in "Breathing Training" below but far superior is the PowerLung. This as discussed above not only exercises inhalation muscles but also the exhalation ones thus, enhancing deeper breathing. A brief history of the device is here.
See also:
The effects of respiratory muscle training on older females.
Mark L. Watsford, Aron J. Murphy, Matthew J. Pine, Aaron J. Coutts. Human Performance Laboratory, University of Technology, Sydney.Resveratrol mist (a chemical found in red wine, grapes, olive oil) may have various health benefits, including possible protection of the lungs.
For a comprehensive look at the importance and benefits a read: "Flood Your Body With Oxygen Therapy for Our Polluted World" by "Mr. Oxygen" Ed McCabe
Chris Gupta
Note: Many articles regarding COPD on the web recommend vaccinations to prevent complications from lung infections. Contrary to the popular belief the flu vaccine can actually weaken the immune system and make you more predisposed to the illness.
The flu vaccine, whether in the shot or nasal form, is worthless at best and should be avoided. Not only are they loaded with toxic chemicals including mercury and aluminum, but many people come down with the flu shortly after receiving the shot. This is because it actually weakens the immune system, making the person more predisposed to the illness.
Launching a immune response among immune compromised will have the opposite effect particular in the an venerable groups such as the elderly and/or those who are nutritionally compromised
For more see: Should You Get The Flu Shot?
See also: Vaccines Often The Cause of "Multiple Sclerosis & Other DEMYELINATING Diseases"
CG
----------------
Breathing Exercises
Pursed-Lip Breathing. A technique called pursed-lip breathing can help improve lung function before starting activities. It takes about 10 minutes. When first learning the technique, the patient should lie flat on a bed with his or her head on a pillow. Later, the technique can be performed while walking or enduring any activity requiring extra air.
Continue reading "Improving Lung Function (COPD) - Oxygenation Benefits"
posted by Chris Gupta on Friday May 18 2007
Permalink | Comments (4) | No trackbacks
Trackback link: http://communicationagents.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.r484.cgi/2319
Bills C-51 & C-52 Example letters
May 28, 2008Dr. Carley's comments to PBS re: Autism, ADHD, Vaccinations...
January 14, 2008Re: Vaccines
May 29, 2007Improving Lung Function (COPD) - Oxygenation Benefits
May 18, 2007Vaccines Often The Cause of "Multiple Sclerosis & Other DEMYELINATING Diseases"
March 27, 2007The Flu: 1918 And Now
September 04, 2006Free Flu Vaccine - Fails To Reduce Cases: Waste Of Money In Ontario Since 2000
May 10, 2006Chickenpox Vaccine Doesn't Work
January 26, 2006Re: CDC-vaccinations DELAY ONLY ALLOWED IF....
January 18, 2006Questions About Avian Flu Or Any Expending Pandemic
November 28, 2005CODE RED Alert - U.S. Senate Bill Broadly Eliminates Liability For Vaccines And Drugs
October 19, 2005Vaccine Mongering - Will Government Experimentation Cause An Avian Flu Epidemic?
October 13, 2005More On Vaccine/Autism Connection
June 16, 2005Only Vaccinated Amish Children Are Autistic
April 22, 2005The Meningococcal Gold Rush - Pushing the Vaccine Agenda
March 01, 2005SARS Vaccine Linked To Liver Damage In Ferret Study
January 14, 2005Autism-Mercury Defence Restored by Nutritional Interventions
January 04, 2005TIME TO TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT VACCINATIONS
November 23, 2004Court Rules-No Forced Anthrax Vaccination
October 29, 2004Evidence Based Flu Vaccine - You Jest?
October 28, 2004Meningococcal Disease at 10 to 13 Year Lows - Yet The Vaccine Propaganda Continues
October 27, 2004VACCINE FOR MENINGITIS?
October 13, 2004Vaccine Shenanigans - Meningococcal Disease
October 12, 2004DR. COLETTE HARMAN ON HEPATITIS B VACCINE
September 30, 2004Cod Liver Oil to Heal Autism (Vaccinations)
September 20, 2004SOMETHING IS ROTTEN IN DENMARK
September 15, 2004MMR AND AUTISM: The link really has been established
September 14, 2004Petition - Show us the Vaccine Data
September 09, 2004Vaccine Data Leads to a Shocking Discovery
February 26, 2004Disease Reduction & Medicine
February 18, 2004Safe Vaccine Lawsuit? Hmm...
December 16, 2003Canned tuna or canned poison?
December 14, 2003Medical Liars - Vaccines
December 12, 2003Operation Cure.all -- Whose Cure?
December 11, 2003HAZARDS OF THE FLU VACCINE
December 10, 2003Drugs Do Not Work On Most Patients
December 09, 2003Re: Canadian Vaccine Laws
December 03, 2003Canadian Vaccine Laws
November 29, 2003FluMist vaccine
August 27, 2003"Uncle" says, "it´s good for you!"
August 04, 2003UPI Investigates: The vaccine conflict
August 03, 2003
A Person Is Only As Valuable As She Can Be Of Help To Others
Home | Site map | About | Contact
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.These articles are brought to you strictly for educational and informational purposes.
Be sure to consult your health practitioner of choice prior to any specific use of any of the non drug device or food based medicinal products referenced herein.The Ads are not a an endorsement of the webmasters or writers on this site and are simply a means to facilitate our ability bring you more information not generally available via mainstream media. You are encouraged to take matters in your own hands with the tools and ideas provided on this site and elsewhere.
