Canada Revenue Agency Class Action
This is one PR the media will ignore..................... Croft Woodroff
An address by G. Edward Griffin. If there ever could be such a thing, this is it. This brilliant tax plan was used successfully to finance the United States government for 137 years. Explains the real reason we have an income tax (it is not to raise revenue for the government) and exposes the hidden dangers of a flat tax, national sales tax, value-added tax, and other so-called tax-reform proposals. 42 min.
The original tax scheme was only to deal with emergencies and had a time limit on how long the taxes would be levied. In other words real accountability! The following is good primer for those who think our taxes are for the services we receive - nothing could be further from the truth.
As always I'd be happy to lend the above tape to anyone in the London Ont. Canada area.
Chris Gupta
See also: Canada: Class Action Accuses Banks of Illegal Creation of Money
-------------------------------
National Press ReleaseMedia Release
Contact:
John R. Dempsey or Lovey Cridge
E-Mail: classaction_cpa@hotmail.com or classproceeding@yahoo.ca
April 22, 2005FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
New Westminster, B.C., April 22, 2005. While the Liberal Party is busy doing damage control regarding the immigration sponsorship scandal, Lovey Cridge, a retired forensic accountant and John Ruiz Dempsey BSCr, LL.B, a criminologist and forensic litigation specialist, both residents of Surrey, B.C., filed a class action suit on behalf of the People of Canada alleging that the Income Tax Act is a fraud. The complaint which could be the biggest class action of all time was filed on Friday April 22, 2005 in the Supreme Court of British Columbia at New Westminster. The suit alleges that the government of Canada has engaged in a deliberate scheme to defraud the people of Canada through its illegal use of an invalid or non-existent statute, namely, the Income Tax Act of 1948 which has never been properly enacted according to law. The statement of claim alleges that the Plaintiffs which includes all of the People of Canada as the purported "taxpayers” have been defrauded and continues to be defrauded by the Canadian government, its collection agents, the now privatized Canada Revenue Agency (the former Revenue Canada), and robbed of their wealth and fruits of their labour through an elaborate scheme of coloured, illegal and unlawful seizure of property and money through the use of various coercive schemes, threats of fines and incarceration using the bogus and non-existent tax law, and the unlawful revisions thereof namely the Income Tax Act as contained within the Revised Statutes of Canada.The Plaintiffs says that there is no such thing as a lawful Income Tax Act in Canada. This so-called Act, is not a valid and lawful Act; this "Act” was unlawfully fabricated in violation of the Constitution of Canada, namely, the British North America Act of 1867 as it existed at the time of the purported enactment of the illegal Act.
On or about the year 1948, the Parliament of Canada introduced a Bill which was intended to repeal the War Income Tax of 1917. This Bill which was intended to become the Income Tax Act of 1948, with unlawfully created versions thereof incorporated within various derivatives of the Revised Statutes of Canada are now fraudulently being used by the Defendants to rob the Plaintiffs and all the people of Canada, was never enacted, and never had any force and effect at any time.The said Bill [or purported Income Tax Act] or the principle of the said bill was said to have been debated with the speeches recorded in the Hansard. At the conclusion of the process, the bill in principle" was sent to the senate for approval. The said bill did not get the senate's approval; the bill was sent back to the House of Commons for correction but no correction was made and therefore the bill "died" and never became a valid or lawful Act. Further, the said Bill only went through two readings and did not pass the senate. Pursuant to the constitution, a Bill must go through three readings and this so-called Bill, supposed to be named the Income Tax Act of 1948 was never passed, and therefore this Act has never been a lawful Act and therefore void and of no force and effect. The bill as passed must be "read" three times in the Senate. The said bill was not passed by the Senate. Moreover, for a bill or Act to be lawful and valid, any bill passed by the Canadian Parliament and the Senate must be assented to by the representative of the real Crown of England the "Royal Assent” by the Governor General. At no time had this purported Act been given a Royal Assent by the Governor General if at all. And finally, pursuant to the Canadian Constitution, any Act that has been given a Royal Assent must be published in the Canada Gazette. At no time had this purported Act been published in any Gazette.
Notwithstanding the fact that the said Income Tax of 1948 has not been lawfully passed by the Parliament, nor had it been given a Royal Assent, nor been published in the Canada Gazette, the Defendants, took it upon themselves, to collect income taxes and extorted monies from the people of Canada without any colour of right, and without legal or juristic authority from 1948 to the present, and continues to collect and extort monies and properties from the people of Canada unlawfully.
Those who resisted or refused to pay income taxes were either arrested and falsely incarcerated, charged under various false criminal offences and their properties were unlawfully seized or confiscated contrary to the Magna Charta, the English Bill of Rights 1689, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Plaintiffs claim that the government and its agents also violated the Canadian Bill of Rights of 1960 after its enactment as well the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms after it was enacted and accepted as law that is enshrined within the Constitution of 1982 in Canada.
To further carry out their fraud and deception, these Defendants "revised” the bogus Income Tax Act of 1948 (Income Tax Act 1948, c. 52) and fraudulently and without colour of right, incorporated the illegal Act within the 1952 Revised Statutes of Canada (see R.S.C. 1952, c. 148). To further conceal their deception, the Defendants again revised the unlawful and counterfeit Income Tax Act (now with the reference to the year "1948” removed) and integrated this "new” Act with the 1970 Revised Statutes of Canada (see R.S.C.1970, c. 1-5). Again, to further obscure the truth and complete the "colouring” process, the 1970 (R.S.C. 1970, c. 1-5) Revised Statutes of Canada was again revised and further became the 1985 Revised Statutes of Canada (R.S.C. 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp)).
In all of the above machinations, debauchery and wicked manipulations and fraudulent misrepresentations, these government failed to fully hide the fact that Canada never had a valid and lawful income tax act or statute that could have justified the colossal crimes and unlawful acts perpetrated by the Canadian government against its own people.
The Plaintiffs, Lovey Cridge and John Ruiz Dempsey, with the help of other researchers searched law libraries and archives for any proof that the impugned Income Tax Act might exist. The Plaintiffs found no evidence of it. The Plaintiffs says such "Act” simply did not exist and are therefore claiming for damages including the return of all monies and property wrongfully collected (stolen) by the Canadian government.
posted by Chris Gupta on Tuesday April 26 2005
updated on Saturday September 24 2005URL of this article:
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/2005/04/26/canada_revenue_agency_class_action.htm
Related ArticlesArtificial Water Fluoridation: Off To A Poor Start / Fluoride Injures The Newborn
Please watch this short 5 minute video: Little Things Matter: The Impact of Toxins on the Developing Brain Toxins such as Arsenic, Lead, Mercury, Aluminum and other known and unknown chemicals, that are often above the legal limits, are deliberately added to our water to manage the disposal of toxic industrial waste chemicals under the pretense of "safe and effective" for water fluoridation mantra.Knowing and acting on the above should... [read more]
December 30, 2014 - Chris GuptaDrinking Water Fluoridation is Genotoxic & Teratogenic
This paper by Prof. Joe Cummins is a very important 5 minute delegation made to London Ontario Canada "Civic Works Committee" public participation meeting on January 25, 2012 on fluoride*. While a bit technical it is short and easy to grasp. A must read as it goes to the heart of the matter regarding the well established toxicity of fluoride which is well in all scientific circles even before water... [read more]
February 06, 2012 - Chris GuptaDemocracy At Work? - PPM On Fluoride
Here is a commentary on the recent (Jan, 25th, 2011) Public Participation Meeting (PPM) on Fluoride in the City of London, Ontario. The meeting started with a strong pro fluoride stance form the City engineer. His lack of knowledge on chemistry of the toxic wastes used to fluoridate water could embarrass even a high school student never mind his own profession. He blatantly violated his "duty to public welfare" as... [read more]
January 29, 2012 - Chris Gupta
