As Expected Bill C-51 Is Back Reworked As Bill C-6
Not surprisingly this is exactly the kind of strategy that was expected, given that Bill C-52 (which was very much like the original C-51) got though while the masters of deception had us busy with C-51.
From David's preliminary review below, it is plan to see that Bill C-6 plus Bill C-52 essentially brings back Bill C-51! I certainly should not put it beyond the government that this indeed was the strategy all along, given the strong public support on the efficacy and safety our supplements compared to generally toxic and often ineffective drugs...
"Bill C-6 gives powers to inspectors to stop the importation or sale of a product and to seize property and documents, based entirely on the inspector's "belief" that a product may be harmful. There is no requirement for the inspector to produce any documented proof nor scientific evidence of harm. There is a requirement to get a warrant if the goods and evidence to be seized are in a personal dwelling; however, such warrant could be issued over the telephone by a judge who would base his decision entirely on the unsubstantiated "belief" of the inspector.."
To understand that this is systematic, dismantling our protections via the installation of industry PR stooges in key scientific positions such as those of the Health Canada who tabled C-6, read Dr. Shiv Chopra detailed book "Corrupt to The Core".
In it a "good account is made of how our science based institutions have been systematically overhauled into industry organs while maintaining the pretence of protecting the public...."
Chris Gupta
-------------------
Please see below Dr. David Rowland's initial comments:
Bill C-6 specifically EXEMPTS products listed in Schedule 1, which includes both "drugs" and "foods". "Natural Health Products" are not specifically mentioned in Schedule 1. NHPs are treated for regulatory purposes as a sub-category of "drugs"; however, one wonders if their omission from Schedule 1 may be a deliberate semantic loophole.
Bill C-6 gives powers to inspectors to stop the importation or sale of a product and to seize property and documents, based entirely on the inspector's "belief" that a product may be harmful. There is no requirement for the inspector to produce any documented proof nor scientific evidence of harm. There is a requirement to get a warrant if the goods and evidence to be seized are in a personal dwelling; however, such warrant could be issued over the telephone by a judge who would base his decision entirely on the unsubstantiated "belief" of the inspector.
C-6 effectively gives absolute power to the Health Minister to take whatever measures she feels necessary to stop the sale of the allegedly "unsafe" product – subject only to the rubber stamp of approval of a court, which surely would be granted because all the Minister has to do is apply to the court; there would be no actual hearing at which the accused would be present.
Fines are exorbitant: up to $5,000,000 and/or imprisonment for 2 years.C-6 also gives the Minister the ability to pierce the corporate veil and hold personally liable the directors and officers of a company who may have been (a) fulfilling their duties in good faith, and (b) not guilty of any actual wrongdoing. So C-6 effective throws out the window the entire foundation of corporate law.
C-6 gives Health Canada the power to levy criminal penalties for what are nothing more than alleged violations of departmental regulations.All a person has to do to commit a "violation" is to contravene a bureaucratic "order". It does not matter if the violation was unintentional, if no one was harmed, if there was no intention to harm, if there was no victim and no crime.
Further, a person named in a notice of violation is NOT permitted the defence that (a) he exercised due diligence to prevent the violation, or (b) believes that the facts will exonerate him. The only thing that matters is that a deemed violation was committed.
All property seized under the proposed Act may be disposed of by whatever means the Health Minister chooses.
One also wonders what the implications are in the introduction where C-6 gives allegiance to "a government of a foreign state" or "an international organization of states". Who is pulling whose strings?
That's how I see it.
Sincerely,
Dr. David W. Rowland
------------------------------Trueman's comments follow:
URGENT EMERGENCY HEALTH FREEDOM ALERT AND CALL TO ARMS from the Canadian Coalition for Health Freedom and The Direct Democracy Federation of Canada and the Republican Party of Ontario.
The Fascist/ Socialistic Conservative Party of Canada lead by King Harper the 1st has as expected on Thursday, January 29th, allowed the Minister of Health, the Honourable Leona Aglukkaq, to table legislation for so-called consumer product safety. This is not the old Bill C-51 but is the reworded very similar thing.
The Global Elites newest initiative is now known as Bill C-6Watch for our new E-Protest campaign and be sure to renew your memberships and help recruit new supporters.
TrueMan
posted by Chris Gupta on Sunday February 1 2009
URL of this article:
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/2009/02/01/as_expected_bill_c51_is_back_reworked_as_bill_c6.htm
Related ArticlesDrinking Water Fluoridation is Genotoxic & Teratogenic
This paper by Prof. Joe Cummins is a very important 5 minute delegation made to London Ontario Canada "Civic Works Committee" public participation meeting on January 25, 2012 on fluoride*. While a bit technical it is short and easy to grasp. A must read as it goes to the heart of the matter regarding the well established toxicity of fluoride which is well in all scientific circles even before water... [read more]
February 06, 2012 - Chris GuptaDemocracy At Work? - PPM On Fluoride
Here is a commentary on the recent (Jan, 25th, 2011) Public Participation Meeting (PPM) on Fluoride in the City of London, Ontario. The meeting started with a strong pro fluoride stance form the City engineer. His lack of knowledge on chemistry of the toxic wastes used to fluoridate water could embarrass even a high school student never mind his own profession. He blatantly violated his "duty to public welfare" as... [read more]
January 29, 2012 - Chris Gupta"Evidence Be Damned...Patient Outcome Is Irrelevant" - From Helke
Further to The Future of Complementary/Integrative Medicine & Patient Choice, here is an important must read and act note from Helke Ferrie, a superb Medical Science Writer and Publisher. Now that the true colours of the well known shortcomings of allopathic medicine are being discovered en mass, the screws are being tightened by the pharmaceutical masters on their medical puppets. It seems that they are prepared to stop at nothing.... [read more]
September 16, 2011 - Chris Gupta
