As Expected Bill C-51 Is Back Reworked As Bill C-6
CategoriesNot surprisingly this is exactly the kind of strategy that was expected, given that Bill C-52 (which was very much like the original C-51) got though while the masters of deception had us busy with C-51.
From David's preliminary review below, it is plan to see that Bill C-6 plus Bill C-52 essentially brings back Bill C-51! I certainly should not put it beyond the government that this indeed was the strategy all along, given the strong public support on the efficacy and safety our supplements compared to generally toxic and often ineffective drugs...
"Bill C-6 gives powers to inspectors to stop the importation or sale of a product and to seize property and documents, based entirely on the inspector’s “belief” that a product may be harmful. There is no requirement for the inspector to produce any documented proof nor scientific evidence of harm. There is a requirement to get a warrant if the goods and evidence to be seized are in a personal dwelling; however, such warrant could be issued over the telephone by a judge who would base his decision entirely on the unsubstantiated “belief” of the inspector.."
To understand that this is systematic, dismantling our protections via the installation of industry PR stooges in key scientific positions such as those of the Health Canada who tabled C-6, read Dr. Shiv Chopra detailed book "Corrupt to The Core".
In it a "good account is made of how our science based institutions have been systematically overhauled into industry organs while maintaining the pretence of protecting the public...."
Chris Gupta
-------------------
Please see below Dr. David Rowland’s initial comments:
Bill C-6 specifically EXEMPTS products listed in Schedule 1, which includes both “drugs” and “foods”. “Natural Health Products” are not specifically mentioned in Schedule 1. NHPs are treated for regulatory purposes as a sub-category of “drugs”; however, one wonders if their omission from Schedule 1 may be a deliberate semantic loophole.
Bill C-6 gives powers to inspectors to stop the importation or sale of a product and to seize property and documents, based entirely on the inspector’s “belief” that a product may be harmful. There is no requirement for the inspector to produce any documented proof nor scientific evidence of harm. There is a requirement to get a warrant if the goods and evidence to be seized are in a personal dwelling; however, such warrant could be issued over the telephone by a judge who would base his decision entirely on the unsubstantiated “belief” of the inspector.
C-6 effectively gives absolute power to the Health Minister to take whatever measures she feels necessary to stop the sale of the allegedly “unsafe” product – subject only to the rubber stamp of approval of a court, which surely would be granted because all the Minister has to do is apply to the court; there would be no actual hearing at which the accused would be present.
Fines are exorbitant: up to $5,000,000 and/or imprisonment for 2 years.C-6 also gives the Minister the ability to pierce the corporate veil and hold personally liable the directors and officers of a company who may have been (a) fulfilling their duties in good faith, and (b) not guilty of any actual wrongdoing. So C-6 effective throws out the window the entire foundation of corporate law.
C-6 gives Health Canada the power to levy criminal penalties for what are nothing more than alleged violations of departmental regulations.All a person has to do to commit a “violation” is to contravene a bureaucratic “order”. It does not matter if the violation was unintentional, if no one was harmed, if there was no intention to harm, if there was no victim and no crime.
Further, a person named in a notice of violation is NOT permitted the defence that (a) he exercised due diligence to prevent the violation, or (b) believes that the facts will exonerate him. The only thing that matters is that a deemed violation was committed.
All property seized under the proposed Act may be disposed of by whatever means the Health Minister chooses.
One also wonders what the implications are in the introduction where C-6 gives allegiance to “a government of a foreign state” or “an international organization of states”. Who is pulling whose strings?
That’s how I see it.
Sincerely,
Dr. David W. Rowland
------------------------------Trueman's comments follow:
URGENT EMERGENCY HEALTH FREEDOM ALERT AND CALL TO ARMS from the Canadian Coalition for Health Freedom and The Direct Democracy Federation of Canada and the Republican Party of Ontario.
The Fascist/ Socialistic Conservative Party of Canada lead by King Harper the 1st has as expected on Thursday, January 29th, allowed the Minister of Health, the Honourable Leona Aglukkaq, to table legislation for so-called consumer product safety. This is not the old Bill C-51 but is the reworded very similar thing.
The Global Elites newest initiative is now known as Bill C-6Watch for our new E-Protest campaign and be sure to renew your memberships and help recruit new supporters.
TrueMan
posted by Chris Gupta on Sunday February 1 2009
URL of this article:
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/2009/02/01/as_expected_bill_c51_is_back_reworked_as_bill_c6.htm
Related ArticlesMagnesium: Research Misconduct?
Here is another example of how systematically - the pharmaceuticals manipulate safe and cost effective solutions and put us at risk and all the time extolling their self serving concern for the patient. Just one, of far too many, examples of this sort of thing happening time after time. Its sad to see how the researchers get sucked into these! This is an update that includes links and error corrections.... [read more]
October 23, 2005 - Chris GuptaBRUSSELS SPROUTS MORE CONTROLS
Please go to STOP BRUSSELS FROM KILLING NATURAL MEDICINE and take action now. Thanks Chris Gupta ..."the importance of B6, and the other vitamin B compounds. In the same week that the FSA produced its weighty document, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) published a study of heart patients who had had an angioplasty. Usually, around 20 per cent of all angioplasty patients need a repeat operation within... [read more]
August 31, 2003 - Chris GuptaTen drugs to avoid whenever possible
It just keeps getting better and better for the medical Mafia. Continue pumping us with more toxins and just deal with symptoms. Thus creating a whole horde of future customers (patients) - Gee I wonder why they are so set against safe nutritional alternatives?? What a bonanza! Chris Gupta 1. Prozac. This wonder drug whose side effects are now being uncovered. Aside from all the known side effects, including insomnia,... [read more]
July 27, 2003 - Chris Gupta
