Vaccine Mongering - Will Government Experimentation Cause An Avian Flu Epidemic?
CategoriesThe following sounds so diabolical that it is hard to believe. But just connect the dots... First cause the epidemic then dig up a vaccine any vaccine to calm the masses and make a killing (pun intended).
"A prominent vaccine developer and researcher (Wagner?) with the University of Tennessee gave the show away on CNN's Lou Dobbs show October 10, 2005 when he told Dobbs that the vaccine manufacturers were not interested in supplying a vaccine for the predicted flu pandemic unless the U.S. government would protect them from liability suits. That should tell you just how safe these shots really are when the insurance companies won't touch them."
See:
Senate Bill To Limit Pharma Liability for Mercury Poisoning
Media Control - Four Networks Reject Ad Opposing Bush on Lawsuits
"This is not new about Big Pharma not able to get liability insurance for their vaccines... That is why Congress assumed liability for the mandatory childhood vaccine program in 1987. Since then over one billion dollars (YES, BILLION!) has been paid out for vaccine injuries representing only 10 % of the injuring claims."
See:
Legal Action Over Mefloquine (Malaria Drug) - Share The Wealth
"If the underwriters wont offer liability coverage, why should anyone take a chance on these shots?"
Chris Gupta
-----------------------------Will government experimentation cause an Avian Flu Epidemic?
Dr. Len Horowitz has recently expounded on the origins of epidemics and their causes, in a wide-ranging article - Avian Flu Fright: Politically Timed for Global "Iatrogenocide" - a copy of which I have placed on my website at http://www.cqs.com/horowitz.htm since I cannot yet find it published anywhere else. (In the article, Dr. Horowitz specifically gives permission for anyone to do so to get the word out.)
While I do not subscribe to everything Dr. Horowitz says in the article, he has some profound observations about epidemics and their connection to vaccines. And he reminds us: vaccines are based on existing virus cultures, since they use "attenuated" or "inactivated" copies of the viruses to supposedly invoke the human immune system to create antibodies.
Now add to this information: a small percentage of people who are treated with vaccines actually get the full-blown illness. This still happens with all the vaccines for childhood illness, even with polio vaccine. Since Avian Influenza supposedly kills more than 50% of its victims, and since there is no natural immunity in the rest of the population, this is an extremely serious matter. How would they prevent those unfortunate enough to get the full-blown illness from spreading it to the mostly-unprotected population?
After reading Dr. Horowitz's article, I remembered that there have been recent press releases about experimental vaccines that are being prepared - right now - for Avian Influenza, and federal authorities were concerned that not enough will be available if there is an outbreak or epidemic. But something doesn't make sense: other articles have stated that the Avian Flu hasn't mutated yet to be able to spread from human to human easily. So how are they creating a vaccine for a virus that doesn't exist yet? And how are they testing such a vaccine, for a virus that supposedly kills more than 50% of its victims?
The answer was even more horrifying than the question: two U.S. companies have been contracted to create and test Avian Flu vaccines on 450 voluntary human subjects in three cities: Rochester, NY, Baltimore MD, and Los Angeles, CA, using a culture of H5N1 Avian Flu isolated in China in 2004. In this article published by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), there is no mention of quarantine for the test subjects: http://www.nih.gov/news/pr/mar2005/niaid-23.htm
What does this mean? They are playing with fire. 450 people in three major cities are being "vaccinated" with an "experimental" vaccine with a supposedly "inactivated" virus that kills more than half of its victims if it is fully active, and for which there is not yet any natural immunity. If a minor error is made in the "inactivation" of the virus, many of those volunteers could contract full-blown Avian Influenza. And, statistically, even if no errors are made in vaccine creation, it is likely that at least one of them will contract the illness and may spread it to others.
Finally, even if the vaccine is "successful" and then used to vaccinate thousands or even millions of people, a small percentage of people who are vaccinated will likely become ill, and likely to spread the virus to others who are not vaccinated. In other words, this experimentation is likely to CAUSE AN EPIDEMIC.
What to do?
From the information above, it now seems likely that there WILL be an Avian Flu epidemic this winter, either carried here from the Far East or caused by vaccine experimentation. Please read and refer people to the Avian Flu protection article at http://www.cqs.com/influenza.htm. Stock up on the immune-boosting supplements suggested in the article. Tell people that it is not necessary (or even advisable) to seek the vaccine or anti-viral drugs currently being promoted by the government. Finally, if forced vaccinations and quarantines come to pass, the suggested acute illness regimen in that article can offset the toxic effects of the vaccine and likely protect against contracting illness from it.
This article is available at http://www.cqs.com/epidemic.htm.
Jonathan Campbell
Health Consultant
http://www.cqs.com
posted by Chris Gupta on Thursday October 13 2005
updated on Saturday October 15 2005URL of this article:
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/2005/10/13/vaccine_mongering_will_government_experimentation_cause_an_avian_flu_epidemic.htm
Related ArticlesSenate Bill To Limit Pharma Liability for Mercury Poisoning
A provision introduced by Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist in the Protecting America in the War on Terror Act, introduced in January this year as Senate Bill S-3, will effectively limit the liability of pharmaceutical manufacturers including Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Aventis, Weyeth and Eli Lilly, for having caused widespread poisoning of children resulting in damage to normal brain development. As a matter of fact, an epidemic of autism is sweeping especially... [read more]
April 23, 2005 - Sepp HasslbergerMedia Control - Four Networks Reject Ad Opposing Bush on Lawsuits
This is a perfect example on how selective news is promulgated... Not only is it expensive to run ads, they can't even be run at any cost; if vested interties are the targets - some democracy? ..."We accept advocacy advertising. Our viewers understand that such ads may have a slant."... But "President Bush is siding with the insurance, H.M.O. and drug companies, trying to end what they call frivolous lawsuits,... [read more]
February 02, 2005 - Chris GuptaHealth law may protect Ottawa
Think these regulatory bodies have figured it out that if they continue to neglect the their mandate then they maybe sued out to oblivion... "Did you know that George W. Bush had to insert a clause in the infamous "Patriot Act" to block the huge amount of complaints against Eli Lilly for damages caused by its vaccine (thiomersal)? (Reuters, 26 November 2002: CBS Worldwide, 17 December 2002) Did you know... [read more]
November 14, 2003 - Chris GuptaSafe Vaccine Lawsuit? Hmm...
Next time your doctor or whoever says vaccines are safe - then ask them why this and many other law suits are being and/or have been launched? Please pass this on to any vaccine injured parties. Thanks Chris Gupta ---------------- A Vancouver area law firm is launching a class action law suit on behalf of families whose children have been damaged by thimerosal containing vaccines. To the best of our... [read more]
December 16, 2003 - Chris GuptaLegal Action Over Mefloquine (Malaria Drug)
Sadly our greedy medical Mafia, true this name, have chosen the far primitive but profitable drugs over much simpler and effective methods such as that discussed in "Blood Electrification Effectiveness On Malaria". Imagine what could be done if, even some of this useless, drug research money could have been used to refine and enhance our immune system? Chris Gupta ----------------------- Australian army faces legal action over mefloquine Bob Burton Canberra... [read more]
November 08, 2004 - Chris Gupta
