Forced vaccination ordered by UK court
On 13 June 2003, a London High Court ordered two girls to receive a series of vaccinations over the objections of their mothers, who believe that vaccines are not proven safe and do little to prepare a child's immune system for the challenges modern medicine believes are posed by "infective agents".
The Order was that the children should be injected with the MMR, DPT, meningitis and other vaccines; expressly against the wishes of the mothers and at the request of the two absent, estranged fathers, one of whom is a convicted child sex offender who served a jail sentence for attempted rape and indecent assault of girls aged 10 and 11. He had changed his name and had not informed the mother of his history.
by Pat Rattigan N.D.
On Friday June 13 2003 a High Court judge, Christopher Sumner ordered that the bloodstreams of two girls aged 4 and 10 should be injected, forcibly if necessary, with animal-derived proteins and viruses, formaldehyde, mercury, antibiotics, gelatin, carbolic acid, aluminium etc. - substances contained in some or all of the vaccines prescribed by court order.
The Order was that the children should be injected with the MMR, DPT, meningitis etc vaccines; expressly against the wishes of the mothers and at the request of the two absent, estranged fathers, one of whom is a convicted child sex offender who served a jail sentence for attempted rape and indecent assault of girls aged 10 and 11. He had changed his name and had not informed the mother of his history.
Sumner ignored the fact that the hearing should have been all about whose decision was paramount with regard to the children’s welfare. He allowed two “expert witnesses”, Dr. Conway and Professor Kroll, supporting the vaccine industry, to turn the hearing into an advertisement for vaccination. Sumner was very impressed with the committees that the two served on and regarded them as leading experts in the field. Amongst Kroll’s statements was “… before 1988 when the MMR jab was introduced, research shows that that more than half of the acute measles death (sic) occurred in previously healthy children who had not been immunised.”
No research supports the above statement: there are NO cases where any healthy child has been killed or permanently damaged by measles. The deaths which have occurred have been in children who were severely malnourished, previously ill and who had their measles badly managed, ie suppressed, by the medical orthodoxy.
There is NO evidence that any vaccine is safe or effective: the only large-scale scientifically valid trial concerning a vaccine, the BCG, resulted in more TB in the vaccinated group than in the controls.
The basis for the world wide multi-billion dollar vaccine enterprise is the myth that the smallpox vaccine was a health measure. The shot was an unmitigated disaster, causing tens of thousands of deaths world wide and a colossal legacy of late onset disease conditions: it should have seen a permanent ban on any and all vaccines. None of the relevant graphs show any benefit from vaccination as to disease declines.
ALL vaccinated children are vaccine damaged: it is merely a question of time, location and degree. Vaccine side effects, as recorded on warnings included in the drug packaging, include severe diarrhoea, encephalitis, anorexia, anaphylaxis, arthritis, fever, seizures, Guillain Barre Syndrome, SSPE and death.
Measles, mumps, whooping cough are NOT dangerous diseases. They rather are Nature’s way of clearing inherited and acquired disease tendencies and of providing immunity to the child and, subsequently, to her children.
All of this is totally at variance with the testimonies given by Conway and Kroll, whose views were praised by Sumner as being “based on learning and research”: unlike the views of Dr Jayne Donegan, acting for the mothers. The highly learned male judge and his equally eminent male advisors were in agreement that no alternative anti-Establishment nonsense on the subject of God-given, life saving vaccines had any place in that courtroom. “... I was rather taken aback by the rudeness and personal comments made by Dr Conway in his answer to my first statement. I can see now that it was part of a basic strategy: if the witness can be discredited then what they say can be discounted”, said Dr. Donegan.
Over 2,000 cases of UK litigation, concerning the MMR vaccine alone, are now pending. The damage caused includes Crohn’s Disease, epilepsy, autism, ME, MS, diabetes, hearing and sight defects etc etc.
The mother of the older child has stated “This man has never paid a penny for her support … He has never so much as sent her a birthday or Christmas card. But he keeps trying to get at me through her and I believe this court action ... is just another step in that direction. I don’t want her to have the vaccine but I have been threatened with prison … I don’t want her to see this man but I have been threatened again ... I’m the one who has brought her up, fed her, cared for and loved her but I don’t seem to have any say in this at all ... [my daughter] doesn’t want to see him. She says he frightens her.” And she does not want to be blood-poisoned.
The solicitor acting for the two men is Stephen Foster of Lester Aldridge, Russel House, Oxford Rd Bournemouth BH8 8AA e mail
The appeal against Sumner’s outrageous judgement is scheduled for 10am Thursday, July 24 at The Royal Courts of Justice – Appeals, Families Division, High Holborn, London.
Related sites and articles
Mercury : The Winged Messenger - Book on mercury and autism
Red Flags Weekly: Vaccines and Immune Suppression
posted by Sepp Hasslberger on Tuesday July 22 2003
updated on Wednesday November 24 2010
URL of this article: