There is an almost daily barrage of catastrophic news on new diseases and threats to our health. AIDS, BSE (Mad Cow Disease), Foot and Mouth Disease in Cows, SARS, Anthrax, Smallpox, you name it! Many of these scares are manufactured by the very authorities that should be preventing them. Something is definitely awry here.
August 11, 2013
We have previously published articles by the Australian AIDS-and-biology researcher Cal Crilly, and here is yet another installment.
Cal is someone who digs into scientific studies. He does biological detective work and finds gems that hide in plain view, things we don't normally understand and that even the experts do not see as they are not trained to put discordant facts together and question basic assumptions.
What this new article tells us is that retroviruses - the same kind that are thought to cause immune deficiency or AIDS - are useful and necessary for our immune system to function correctly. That of course tends to leave the hypothesis of a viral causation of AIDS in grave trouble. I say 'hypothesis' because no one has proven, or even come close to a coherent explanation for, the mechanism of AIDS causation by HIV.
How does a retrovirus that is by nature a benign particle, cause devastation of the immune system?
Here we have several scientific studies published in the world's finest journals, which attest to the fact that retroviruses are part and parcel of the human organism, that they are needed to provide certain defensive capabilities against invaders, and that they are not pathogenic.
So we might ask ourselves why HIV tests (thought to indicate the presence of a retrovirus) are still performed, and why doctors are still recommending the use of toxic anti-retroviral drugs to kill what, rather than a foreign invader, appears to be part of normal human metabolic processes.
Cal Crilly lays it out for you, citing and linking the sources...
Continue reading "Retroviral particles in human immune defenses - is AIDS orthodoxy dead wrong?"
posted by Sepp Hasslberger on Sunday August 11 2013
| Comments (2)
October 04, 2012
This is another installment of research into the biochemistry of HIV and Aids by Cal Crilly, an Australian who finds himself fascinated with the intricacies of biology. Crilly analyzes the seemingly unconnected studies that show the biochemical changes that accompany the presence of numerous retroviruses - one of them called HIV - in humans.
The mechanism that makes retroviruses appear is hypomethylation, and it is the same mechanism that accompanies pregnancy and inflammation. Those retroviruses are produced in the course of normal biological activity and they are not infectious. There are many different types (ever heard of HIV 'mutating'?). As an aside, we declare pregnant mothers to be "HIV positive" as pregnancy causes the presence of retroviruses in the course of normal biological activity, and those harmless endogenous retroviruses react with what's generally called an "HIV" test.
Certain basic nutrients - Selenium, Folate, B12, B6, Choline are the most important - counteract hypomethylation of the cells and thereby calm the production of human endogenous retroviruses.
The toxic Aids drug AZT causes hypermethylation but it is so destructive of normal cell processes that most patients die. The 'life prolonging' effect of HAART, the drug cocktail that is prescribed to Aids patients today is due to a sharp decrease in the dosage of deadly AZT in the cocktail.
Cal demonstrates those facts and more with reference to studies you can find as well, if you're interested in the details.
Meanwhile we continue to treat immune compromised people with drugs that further compromise the immune system and - in many cases - kill the patient.
When is medicine going to start treating those people by insisting on better eating and supplementation supplying the correct nutrients?
How long will it take until the toxic drugs are phased out in favor of real prevention?
Continue reading "Missing folate genes and AIDS - treat hypomethylation with nutrients, not toxic drugs!"
posted by Sepp Hasslberger on Thursday October 4 2012
| Comments (2)
August 29, 2012
In this article, Beldeu Singh highlights some of the gross inconsistencies in our current approach to what is called the "AIDS epidemic".
There has never, to this date, been a proper isolation and purification of the human immunodeficiency virus, and one might be justified in saying that there is no AIDS epidemic, but rather an iatrogenic (doctor caused) epidemic of drug-induced deaths and a lot of unnecessary fear and suffering, all based on very wonky science... but it all seems to make excellent business sense, if you are a drug company shareholder or one of the thousands of researchers who work "to find a cure" for AIDS.
by Beldeu Singh
In the early days neutropenia was one of the key parameters of AIDS. The clinical course of severe neutropenia, as described in the basic pathology textbook, “Pathologic Basis of Disease” by Robbins (5th Ed.), which is used in most medical schools to study pathology, describes what happens to people with severe neutropenia. The symptoms and signs of neutropenias are those of bacterial infections... Robbins also states, in italics, that "the most severe forms of neutropenias are produced by drugs." In severe agranulocytosis with virtual absence of neutrophils, "these infections may become so overwhelming as to cause death within a few days," (Robbins, p 631). This sounds disturbingly similar to a description of AIDS.
Dr. Michael Lange, associate chief of infectious diseases at St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital in New York and one of the doctors the FDA consulted when evaluating AZT in 1987, says even he sometimes had trouble differentiating between AZT's toxic effects and AIDS itself. An article in the New England Journal of Medicine describes the muscle wasting caused by AZT and compared it to muscle wasting, called "myopathy", presumed to be caused by HIV. Their comments in the abstract are shocking: "We conclude that long-term therapy with Zidovudine can cause a toxic mitochondrial myopathy, which... is indistinguishable from the myopathy associated with primary HIV infection..." So, there is drug-induced immune suppression and drug-induced AIDS, and AZT can cause AIDS. Yet 5000 scientists signed a declaration that HIV is the sole cause of AIDS. The AIDS industry is built on paradoxes and misguided beliefs.
Continue reading "AIDS – From Drugs to Vaccines "
posted by Sepp Hasslberger on Wednesday August 29 2012
| Comments (1)
December 28, 2008
It is hard to make sense of the numerous contradictions in the official explanation of what causes Aids and how to best fight the scourge. But then - the confusion may be fully intentional. Aids as a strategy and cover for de-population would make perfect sense. It is race specific, its victims are the poor and socially deviant, and if we believe the press, the whole population of the African continent is at grave risk. A high percentage of those treated eventually do die. What they die of is the hard question that must be asked.
Aids testing, prevention and treatment are promoted by the medical/pharmaceutical world and by the mainstream press as essential counter-measures. Yet both Aids testing and treatment target certain racial and social groups and the populations of developing countries, especially if they are located on the African continent.
The interpretation of test results is largely arbitrary. Prevention consists of giving both mother and child a highly toxic shot of medicine, and treatment - more often than not - seals the fate of the victim. Treatment leads to a more or less certain death. All that is promised is that the death will be slowed by "life extending" drugs.
What makes me think of a deliberate strategy with regards to Aids and the confusion that surrounds it, is the point-blank refusal of the reigning pharmaceutical/medical establishment to even address those contradictions, to discuss in an open way with those who point out that something's not right. Perhaps I am too suspicious, but it seems to me that so much bungling cannot be the result of mere inadequacy.
Some of the most egregious contradictions I have found over the years are:
Tests identify people who "have Aids" but they do not find a virus, merely some specific proteins that could be (and apparently are) associated with a host of non-Aids conditions.
The interpretation of tests is different for people with different life stories. Likelihood of a positive test result is increased by being gay or promiscuous, by being of African descent or just by living in a poor part of town, yet "universal testing" is being advocated.
In Africa, the definition of Aids does not rely on a test. It is sufficient if you have the symptoms of several of the diseases that are rampant there, diseases brought on by poor hygiene and by bad nutrition.
Instead of helping Africans overcome the endemic diseases of their continent with better sanitation and freshly grown produce, we send them toxic Aids drugs and industrially produced, often genetically modified grains.
Prevention and treatment of Aids are always highly toxic. More Aids victims die of iatrogenic liver disease brought on by the doctor-prescribed pharmaceutical drugs than of the "opportunistic" diseases that a failing immune system is said to bring on.
People who refuse treatment often do not get ill - especially if they adopt a healthy lifestyle - some have been documented to stay healthy for decades.
Most people who take Aids drugs suffer horrible "side effects", among them immune deficiency brought on by the drugs. They also die early. Yet no studies have been done to compare a natural, healthy regimen of nutrition and good life with the recommended antiretroviral drug treatment.
The isolation of the viral entity that is said to cause Aids has never been published in a peer-review journal. The virus cannot be isolated from sick individuals. No one has shown how the viral entity actually CAUSES immune deficiency. Yet a Nobel prize has recently been awarded to Luc Montagnier and a collaborator for the discovery of HIV.
That rabbit hole is very deep. The more you dig, the more absolutely incomprehensible facts and contradictions emerge.
One of the most articulate critics of the Aids orthodoxy is Dr Andrew Maniotis, a Professor of Pathology and Program Director in the University of Chicago's Department of Pathology, Anatomy, Cell Biology and Bioengineering.
In the following piece, Dr Maniotis highlights the failures of the paradigm that says Aids is caused by an infective agent called HIV and it must be treated with anti-retroviral drugs. In the second part of this post, Dr Maniotis comments on an article in the New Statesman that comments on the controversy around Aids.
Perhaps I should be clear that Dr Maniotis, while pointing at the various inconsistencies, does not advocate any conspiratorial view of Aids. If I imply such a conspiratorial (de-population) connection, that view is mine alone.
The failures of the HIV/Aids hypothesis
According to former NIH director, and Nobel Laureate, Harold Varmus who formed the committee that named HIV HIV, retrovirus-derived DNA sequences (genes that come from viruses whose genes are made out of RNA instead of DNA), may be ancient molecular parasites in their associations with other organisms. As such, they may not be recognizable as foreign molecules to the human immune system (which explains the STEP trial and 60 other "HIV" vaccine disasters, perfectly).
Thus, retroviruses or their components are not immunogenic (capable of being seen as foreign by the human immune system), because HIV's molecules, and those of other retroviruses are not seen as foreign or non-self, because they are, and always have been, part of the incredible repertory of the combinatorial complexity of the normal human genome. Supposedly, if we are around on this planet millions of years from now, the human immunoglobulin cassette (that part of the T-cell genome that immunologists claim can be instantaneously rearranged to respond to foreign antigens) new immuonglobulins will continuously be produced to counter any foreign molecular challenge, which are not yet present on this earth yet. Therefore, we have NOT sequenced the total human genome, because some of its sequences dont yet exist. And they may not exist in persons said to have AIDS, hepatitis B or C or D, as a response to a foreign virus, but these signatures may instead represent the breakdown products of autoimmune diseases that cause cells to spit out virus-like particles.
As molecular parasites, and as response of our own cellular reactions to common diseases, foreign proteins or metabolic and even psychological stressors such as an AIDS or cancer death sentence, retroviruses, their genes, and their molecules, may be simply a byproduct of our stressed cells, because they always have been, are, and always will be, made by our own cells.
The amazing thing is that: some antiretroviral drug regimens in some people (almost half of them it appears) can stop the cells from producing these stress responses and their consequent virus-like particles as shown in the German drug addiction clinics by Heinrich Kremer and Juliana Sacher. But these doctors warn, when taken long-term, HAART will cause damage to the bone marrow and others systems, as literally dozens of mainstream clinical trials have demonstrated.
It isn't only the 60 vaccine failures that raise issue with the HIV=AIDS hypothesis. And it isn't that cures for cancer or HIV-disease have been foiled in every case by mutation.
Other failures of the HIV=AIDS hypothesis include:
The failure to really isolate HIV, from all other objects in the Universe, or to explain what its confusing presence in healthy drug-naïve persons means;
The failure to appreciate, that the association of a molecular marker with any disease state, does not prove, disprove, or even suggest causality;
The failure of the Nobel committee to appreciate, in the case of Montagnier's and Barre-Sinoussi's recent award of the Nobel Prize, that their Patient One's viral isolate, was derived from a fellow with swollen lymph nodes, a history of syphilis and syphilis treatment the year before, a history of gonorrhea, a history of cytomegalovirus infection, a
history of herpes I and II infection, a history of Epstein-Barr virus infection, and God knows what else;
The failure to appreciate, in the case of Robert Gallo's so-called amplification of HIV markers in stimulated tumor-cell cultures not killed by HIV, that HIV markers are detectable in less than half to a third of of 72 healthy persons, and not persons now considered to be AIDS patients. And as shocking as it is, a failure to appreciate that there still is no rational or acceptable cell culture model or method to grow HIV in Petri dishes;
The failure of the Nobel committee to appreciate that,
a) HPV (human papilloma viruses) molecular sequences that are sometimes associated with cervical cancers are just that: they are molecular sequences, not Human papilloma viruses. HPV virus particles, to date have not been shown to induce cervical cells or any other kind of cells to become cancerous, and
b) the failure of the Nobel Committee to acknowledge and heed the widely publicized warnings in the Journal College of American Pathologists (CAP), and also by senior investigators at the National Cancer Institute, and the company Digene who make HPV molecular tests, that HPV-sequences have not been validated against the clinical occurrence of clinical cervical cancer. In this context, the Nobel committee also failed to appreciate the shameful carnage currently being perpetrated by the so-called first cancer vaccine GARDASIL (made by the same company Merck, who 20 years ago claimed that their hepatitis B vaccine was the first anti-cancer vaccine, before France filed a class action suit to stop the hepatitis B vaccine mandate for its young citizens, because it harmed so many);
The failure to sequence the HIV genome as a consistent pattern or sequence, or to identify specific proteins that are not also found in normal, non-infected contexts;
The failure to inform the public (and most scientists) that reverse transcriptase is not specific to viruses, nor are the gag, pol, env, p24, and other so-called HIV-specific genes and their products, which all can be detected in normal, non-infected contexts, and which are published on Medline;
a) to block transmission of HIV or AIDS in mother to child transmission studies (MTCT) as shown by the Cochran Meta-analysis and other peer-reviewed reports, which showed increased HIV mutation rates after black box label drugs such as nevirapine were discontinued in the U.S., and ashamedly administered to more than eight hundred seventy five thousand African mother-infant pairs by Max Essex of Harvard, and others and
b) the failure to acknowledge or appreciate that safety officers of the NIH, such as Dr. Fishbein, who monitored such trials as a safety officer, were fired, while those individuals such as Edmond Tremont who directed the nevaripine trial(s) were not even reprimanded after he had changed the data in safety reports that Dr. Fishbein and others had uncovered, in order to push forward George Bushs PEPFAR pogrom and the eugenics pogram on Africans;
The failure to understand why ARVs (anti-retrovirals) in some individuals, can prevent "AIDS syndromes," because their toxicity to normal immune cells can not only can block these cells from expressing HIV-specific molecules as a normal response to a physiological stress, or as evidence of a rare genetic polymorphism, but because these drugs are so toxic, that like antibiotics, they suppress both fungal and bacterial growth, but cannot prevent theoretical virus proliferation, because if the HIV paradigm is correct, these genomes of HIV are rapidly integrated into the DNA of the infected, and will never be sensitive to drugs designed against their molecules.
The failure of microbicides, condom campaigns, and circumcision, that more often than not, have increased the rate of detecting HIVs molecular markers, instead of decreasing them among African human lab rats;
The failure to
a) appreciate the disaster and infant mortality caused by breast feeding dissuasion campaigns, designed to decrease infant mortality from HIV-infection, but which increased infant mortality 20 times in formula fed infants, compared to mother-infant pairs that didn't listen to their doctors, and who weren't dissuaded from breast feeding, and
b) the failure to appreciate the corresponding terrorism that has been waged against new mothers to promote formula dumping on 3rd World nations, and perhaps because of a hatred of the human females breast and the disgusting nature of breast feeding;
The failure to acknowledge how projected and WHO-manufactured HIV and AIDS prevalence and incidence rates have not materialized, and how they have been recently dismissed by world AIDS leaders such as Kevin de Cock as signaling the end of the heterosexual AIDS era (except of course among people of African descent or homosexuals who have been selectively biased during HIV testing campaigns, or selectively targeted during HIV-preventative microbicide or circumcision campaigns, or manufactured from best guess estimates based on STD clinics or perinatal clinics);
The failure to explain how HIV's latency makes sense from a biochemical point of view;
The failure to support the progress of Doctors Without Borders, who recently showed how the cheap food supplement plumpynut, when given to the children of Niger, the poorest nation in Africa, has reversed the infant mortality rate, and without antibiotics or drugs, or without significant funding, as was revealed on 60 minutes;
The failure to develop a consistent in vitro model to detect HIV infection;
The failure to develop any HIV animal model, while HIV exposed chimps now rest in their 27 million dollar retirement homes because they never developed AIDS after injection with AIDS patient sera or HIV;
The failure of the biomedical establishment to offer and provide support to pursue and fund at least 17 other hypotheses that have explained or have even reversed in some cases, the development of acute Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome;
The failure to pursue and fund inexpensive treatment regimens such as those developed in the German drug-abuse clinics by Heinrich Kremer, Juliana Sacher, or in Africa in Niger, by Doctors Without Borders who fed starving children plumpynut, and by many others who have shown they can reverse immunosuppression non-toxically, and with a minimum, or in most cases, with a complete lack of HAART;
The failure to appreciate why prostitutes and sex workers don't acquire HIV's molecular markers, or develop AIDS, unless they are also chronic immunosuppressive illicit or pharmaceutical drug users or abusers;
The failure to account for why Human HIV transmission studies have not shown HIV or AIDS transmission between serodiscordant couples, or among health care workers inoculated with HIV-tainted blood, or why the spouses of HIV-positive hemophiliacs and HIV-negative partners have failed to seroconvert or develop AIDS after numerous unprotected and repeated exposures to their HIV positive spouses;
The failure to address the phenomenon announced as recently as February 14th, 2008, in San Diego, California, when the local county health department made quite a big deal out of the fact that all sexually transmitted diseases in their local gay community have risen by an astounding 800 percent since 2003, including syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydia, while HIV infection rates have dropped since 2003 in the very same gay community;
The failure to explain how there can be large numbers of so-called Long-Term-Non-Progressors, or Elite Controllers, who never acquire any illness, although they may test positive for HIVs molecular signature for more than two decades, or how it is possible that ICL-AIDS patients to test negative for HIV but who are thought to have AIDS;
The failure to account for how T-cell numbers or viral load don't indicate any effect of a viral presence or infection, or explain why viral load continues to be aggressively monitored despite the fact that no virus has ever been observed in the blood of a so-called HIV-positive individual harboring high viral load as measured by PCR (polymerase chain reaction);
The failure of the AIDS establishment or Nobel committee to acknowledge the significance of the recent Semmelweis clean hands award to Peter Duesberg for initially alerting the scientific community as to the impossibility of the HIV=AIDS hypothesis, and to appreciate the significance of the co-presentation of that award to investigative journalist, Celia Farber, for her initial expose regarding the iatrogenocide committed against gay men during the high-dose AZT era;
And finally, the failure of The AIDS Establishment or AID$ incorporated, to address in any invited public forum, or in the media, why none of their more than 33 HIV test kits first initially patented and launched by Robert Gallo and Abbott Laboratories claim they can't detect HIV, and continue to state on their package inserts, that the significance of HIV's molecular signature is not known.
It isn't all bad news. There have been some successes. Donald Rumsfeld's former biotech company, Gilead Biosciences, make the AIDS cocktail drug atripola, which is now making obscene amounts of money in a plethora of AIDS pogroms (as well as Gilead's Tamiflu to fight the global bird flu pandemic).
It is also a cheerful news that George Bushs PEPFAR pogrom was funded by a propagandized and hoodwinked congress, and will now move forward to dump these and other rank poisons on millions of Africans, and other 3rd World nations like India, China, and others. We also have much to be optimistic about because drugs like nevirapine were withdrawn from use in the U.S. a few years ago because of its rank liver-destructive toxicity, especially in women, and are now continuously being dumped on Africans and other of the Worlds most vulnerable.
Another piece of good news is that Kevin de Cock who is a World AIDS leader, announced recently that heterosexual AIDS is over, except of course, and according to the WHO and to him, among large segments of Africa, and the African American community perhaps, who remain problematic not because of some difference compared to whites in their heterosexual behavior, but simply because they are black. It is my argument that such institutionalized racism, cultural phobia, and targeted selective testing biases have come to define the current AIDS pandemic.
It is also hopeful that with the stroke of a pen, Mr. Obama's administration could reverse the current carnage that is occurring in the black community in all our major cities, and reduce the AIDS deaths in America to those reported in every other civilized country of the world, simply by changing the diagnostic definition of AIDS as other countries have.
Such a pen stroke could save billions of dollars for our failing petrochemical and pharmaceutical economy that refuses to support the development of renewable energy, while it is being developed in civilized continents like South America and Europe. Such a pen stroke also could at the same time save many of our white 13 year-olds (like Ryan White who died of a liver bleed, and whose misfortune because he was a hemophiliac was exploited with the help of the moralistic Jesse Helms to advance the Ryan White Act during the Reagan administration). With the stroke of a pen, President Obama could even save the occasional low risk always faithful to her husband soccer mom, or boy-scout-leader dad, from the devastation that will occur because of the universal testing proposed by the CDC, the American Society of Pediatrics, the AMA, and other physician organizations to test everybody over the age of 13, everyone who enters an emergency room, the entire African American population of New York City, and of course, every infant born in a hospital. A pen stroke could save thousands of low risk persons, who will at low frequency, be convicted of being HIV-positive because they had a recent flu or hepatitis B vaccine.
Andrew Maniotis, PhD.
Continue reading "Aids: An Iatrogenic Depopulation Strategy?"
Visiting Associate Professor of Bioengineering,
University of Illinois, Chicago
posted by Sepp Hasslberger on Sunday December 28 2008
updated on Thursday December 23 2010
| Comments (3)
Retroviral particles in human immune defenses - is AIDS orthodoxy dead wrong?
August 11, 2013
Missing folate genes and AIDS - treat hypomethylation with nutrients, not toxic drugs!
October 04, 2012
AIDS – From Drugs to Vaccines
August 29, 2012
Aids: An Iatrogenic Depopulation Strategy?
December 28, 2008
Rethinking Aids Day - Scientists Call for New Thinking on HIV
April 23, 2008
After Earth Day - Rethinking AIDS on 23 April
April 15, 2008
Kaushalya never was HIV positive
January 25, 2008
AIDS: The Mbeki Challenge
January 11, 2008
Low Dose Naltrexone in AIDS, Cancer and Autoimmune Diseases
July 10, 2007
Bird Flu and Microwaves: Are we Killing Birds with Radiation?
May 29, 2007
Alternatives to AZT in Aids Patients
May 07, 2007
Solving the Antioxidant Question in Aids
March 26, 2007
AIDS: Court Case Exposes Scientific Contradictions
February 07, 2007
Gambian President Says Able To Cure Aids
February 02, 2007
Nano Silver kills microbes - EPA up in Arms
December 07, 2006
World Aids Day - Time To Rethink Prevention, Treatment?
November 30, 2006
Sunshine, Vitamin D May Prevent Influenza
November 28, 2006
Tamiflu, Vaccines May Spark Pandemic 'Bird Flu'
November 24, 2006
Australian Challenges HIV's Existence in Court
November 01, 2006
Nutrition and Immunity - The hungry can't eat Aids messages
September 05, 2006
Will Nature, Science Allow Aids Discussion?
June 23, 2006
'Crystal Meth': Aids Cases Rise in South Africa - Was Duesberg Right?
June 21, 2006
SAM-e: Methylating Agent Stops Depression, HIV
June 11, 2006
Why Retroviruses Appear in AIDS, Cancer and Autoimmune Diseases
May 30, 2006
HIV Test Bogus - Based on Circular Reasoning
May 23, 2006
AIDS - Retrovirus Expression Regulated by Methylation?
May 18, 2006
Why I Quit HIV - Is AIDS Myth Falling Apart?
May 03, 2006
Avian Flu Preventable, Treatable According to Natural Health Groups
April 30, 2006
Glutathione Peroxidase - Selenium, Aminoacids Overcome AIDS
April 26, 2006
CDC Says Bird Flu Not Serious Threat to Humans
April 18, 2006
Avian Flu - A Selenium Deficiency Disease
March 26, 2006
EU Mental Health Decline Due To Mercury Poisoning: Chemist
March 07, 2006
China: Will Nano Selenium Help Prevent Avian Pandemic?
February 17, 2006
Junk Foods Cause 'Mental Illness'
January 18, 2006
Aspartame: UK Parliamentarian Calls For Ban
December 18, 2005
Will government experimentation cause an Avian Flu Epidemic?
December 17, 2005
Better Than A Flu Shot - Vitamin C Does The Trick
November 14, 2005
Avian Flu - Is Specialization Killing Us?
October 28, 2005
S 1873: Pandemic Vaccine Bill To Put Drug Firms Beyond Reach Of Law
October 26, 2005
Bird Flu Scare - 'Handsome Profit' For Rumsfeld
October 20, 2005
Bird Flu Coming - Vaccinate The Birds!
October 20, 2005
Bird Flu In Perspective - Public Fears Exaggerated
October 19, 2005
Are AIDS, CFS Caused By Oxidative Damage?
October 11, 2005
Avian Influenza: Are You Prepared?
October 08, 2005
AIDS 'Made In America' - Journal of Degenerative Diseases
September 24, 2005
HIV-Aids: Are Antibodies Good Or Bad?
August 29, 2005
Valproic Acid: Psychiatric Drug for Aids Patients?
August 13, 2005
Live8 - Lockstep Into AIDS Catastrophe?
June 30, 2005
Epidemics: Chemical Causes Or Virus Scares?
June 02, 2005
AIDS, Vitamin C and Big Pharma's Dark Secrets
May 21, 2005
Investigators Challenge CDC Flu Statistics As Season Draws To Close
April 29, 2005
AIDS, Chronic Fatigue: Modified African Swine Fever Virus Implicated?
April 28, 2005
Senate Bill To Limit Pharma Liability for Mercury Poisoning
April 23, 2005
Overcoming Aids, Infections, Heart Disease: Vitamin C Is Key
April 22, 2005
Mercury To Blame For Diabetes Epidemic, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, Autism
March 27, 2005
Pharma Reticent About Mercury, Vaccine Damage
March 15, 2005
U.N. Says Aids Prevention Will Save Millions of Lives In Africa
March 08, 2005
'Bird Flu', SARS - Biowarfare or a Pandemic of Propaganda?
March 02, 2005
AZT, Nevirapine: Do Anti-Retroviral Drugs Cause AIDS?
February 10, 2005
U.S. Flu Vaccine Glut - Public No Longer Lining Up For Shots
January 29, 2005
Africa - Nevirapine For AIDS Mothers: U.S. Hid Research Concerns
December 14, 2004
World AIDS Day 2004 - What happened to Koch's Postulates?
November 26, 2004
CDC, Media Hype The Flu - Facts Show Different Picture
November 06, 2004
AZT, Nevirapine - Children In New York Orphanage Given Toxic Drugs
November 05, 2004
US Court: Forced Anthrax Vaccination Illegal - FDA's Approval Invalid
October 28, 2004
New Zealand: Meningococcal Mass Vaccination Experiment Scientifically Unjustifiable
October 26, 2004
Uganda: Pfizer Sponsored AIDS Institute Snubs Natural Treatment Options
October 22, 2004
AIDS Called Black Genocide - US Special Virus Program Chart Vindicates Maathai
October 20, 2004
New Zealand Meningococcal Vaccine Campaign - Facts Disregarded: Risk Expert
October 18, 2004
Wangari Maathai: Nobel Calls AIDS 'Weapon Of Mass Destruction'
October 12, 2004
Chiron: Vaccine License Suspended - Doubts Over Flu And Meningococcal Vaccines
October 06, 2004
AIDS Experiments on Children in New York's Incarnation Center 'A Human Tragedy'
July 15, 2004
'Global Business Coalition' Wants More Testing: But Tests Do Not Show AIDS
July 10, 2004
Harvard Research in Tanzania Confirms: Multivitamin Slows AIDS Progression
July 01, 2004
AIDS Surviver Teaches Africans How To Overcome 'HIV Infection'
June 30, 2004
AIDS Test 'Is Not Proof Of Infection'
June 13, 2004
Mad Cow in the US: We're going to D.C.
May 17, 2004
Jerndal: AIDS Statistics are 'Smoke and Mirrors' - Epidemic is False Alarm
May 06, 2004
Aids Test Unscientific: Test Kit Makers Sued in Kansas
April 27, 2004
BSE: USDA Rejected Testing Scheme for Mad Cow
April 25, 2004
South Africa: Traditional Medicine to Fight AIDS, Poverty
February 16, 2004
Gates obsessed - battling virus plague
February 13, 2004
The Avian Flu and Drugless Doctors
February 07, 2004
The Great Hep B Scam
January 30, 2004
Mad Cow in the US - Dishonest Beef
January 29, 2004
Polio Vaccine Voodoo - Intriguing Questions
January 25, 2004
Survey confirms - Aids Numbers in Africa overestimated
January 10, 2004
The Fujian virus - promoting flu vaccines
December 15, 2003
Flu Mist anyone?
December 11, 2003
Flu shots - how useful are they?
December 04, 2003
AIDS Day Hypocrisy - why fall for the propaganda
December 01, 2003
Mad Cow Disease - setting the record straight on BSE
November 11, 2003
China, Sars - will the real "patient zero" please stand up?
September 23, 2003
New SARS case linked to laboratory
September 10, 2003
SARS - will new WHO Chief investigate "Patient Zero"?
July 21, 2003
Gates funds vaccination
July 15, 2003
AIDS in Africa
June 26, 2003
HIV and AIDS
June 15, 2003
Vitamin C could be effective against SARS
June 06, 2003
SARS and Gulf War Syndrome
June 03, 2003
Health Supreme's RSS News Feeds
Subscribe to Health Supreme's "Epidemics" News Feed
Subscribe to Health Supreme's RSS News Feed
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
These articles are brought to you strictly for educational and informational purposes. Be sure to consult your health practitioner of choice before utilizing any of the information to cure or mitigate disease. Any copyrighted material cited is used strictly in a non commercial way and in accordance with the "fair use" doctrine.