"Canadian product safety laws are now over 40 years old and we need to do more to update and improve the law to help protect our families from harmful products".
Translation: Canadian laws are too restrictive (ie have too much protection built in them) we need to modernize/update (ie loosen the them so we can pick and choose who we want to go after to squelch competition against our pharma friends by removing the current - 40 year safe guards that protect against such abuse.)
..."A key element appears to be the redesign of the federal approach to health and safety regulation in order to create an “advantage” for industry by means of weaker safety standards."
As usual the modernizing/updating of our laws is totally opposite to what is portrayed by the government... And they don't stop here. See also: How to Stop Being Manipulated!
The Shenanigan's never stop... If at first you don't succeed try again till you do succeed. Wear out the opposition even it is the majority - to do the dirty bidding of the industry.... Need I say more?
Chris Gupta
----------------------------
Trueman On 08/06/2010 7:48 PM, Stella Melnychuk wrote:
No where in the article does it mention Bill C-6, but "The new bill, expected to be tabled Wednesday, will also require that companies begin to report safety-related incidents to the government. Canadian product safety laws are now over 40 years old and we need to do more to update and improve the law to help protect our families from harmful products".
Is this a lot of "word-spinning"? How serious is "to be tabled Wednesday", I wonder. I am a bit confused here.
Stella
----------------------
Attention All GIA Freedom Network Rights Advocates,
Here we go again - we have a partial victory - our pressure since Xmas has resulted in King Harper and his global masters such as the Bilderberger Gang not daring to attempt to bring back Bill C-6.
I have been in Ottawa several times a month on an average since Parliament reconvened earlier this year.
BUT, tomorrow at around 3:00 PM King Harper will introduce the newest version of Bills C-51, C-52 and C-6. PLEASE go to www.canadiancoalitionforhealthfreedom.ca and/or www.friendsoffreedominternational.org and send your E-Mandate Protest letter now and donate to our organizations to ensure that we can continue challenging "THEM" successfully.
For any of you that doubt that we are the best two grassroots Peoples' organizations in Canada to join and support to reign in the out of control federal bureaucracies such as Health Canada please read the Toronto Star and National Post articles below.
Also, for any of you that do not know who the Bilderberger Gang is - please see the following articles - Stephen Harper was recruited to be the next Prime Minister/De Facto King of Canada in the July 2003 France meeting of the Bilderberger Gang. Also see below Order Paper for the Canadian Parliament tomorrow listing the new introduction of Health Canada's Consumer Safety Act.
HELP US STOP "THEM" - PLEASE go to www.canadiancoalitionforhealthfreedom.ca and/or www.friendsoffreedominternational.org and send your E-Mandate Protest letter now and donate to our organizations to ensure that we can continue challenging "THEM" successfully.
Trueman Tuck, Managing Director Canadian Coalition for Health Freedom and Friends of Freedom International
The government is hardly interested in preserving our farm land. The US model is slowly being imported in Canada as the prisoners are cheap source of labour. We all need to educate our MP's on this issue and appeal to their sense of humanity. Most are busy protecting their turf and simply sign or carry through the wishes of their Party leaders who have totally different agendas form the constituents. They need to understand that they too are in the plight of their own constituents and will also lose healthy local produce/farmlands that could make their jurisdictions self sufficient; protect them and their children/grandchildren from imported food dependencies. Not to mention the loss of local jobs.
We need to also need to educate them on the possible prison replacement diet with cheap, unhealthy and highly processed industrial foods especially with the continual funding cutbacks. See:
I am a member of a group here in Kingston that is protesting the closure of six prison farms across Canada. We have two here in Kingston, one right in the middle of the city which produces milk and eggs for the prison system as a whole, and is located on 800 acres of prime farmland. The other prison farm just a few miles out of the city has an abattoir attached to it, which serves the local farmers and local food system.
We have been protesting ever since the announcement for closure was made in 2008. We have taken cattle to Parliament Hill, staged protests outside the prison farms, held public meetings, wear T-shirts in public, had Public Safety Critic, Mark Holland, and Agriculture Critic Wayne Easter address Kingston City Council (they were granted TWO MINUTES EACH by the Mayor), and have a website. Still, the government insists that the top notch dairy herd will be sold in June. Once this happens, it will be just about impossible to bring the farms back. Some of the six have already been closed, despite the set closure date of 2011.
At first, we were protesting the loss of 800 acres of farmland, then we found out that the government is likely planning to build super prisons on the land. They will be tightening the laws, thereby putting more people in prison – and also at the same time, losing the ability to feed them on their own farms with inmate labour. The sign outside the farms still reads “Paying their way through Agriculture”. The farm used to turn a profit (and probably still does) The Harper government will not divulge the costs of running the farms – they say they are losing $4 million annually, but won’t let anyone look at the raw data. The closures will affect ALL taxpayers, through increased taxes to pay for the “modernization” and “more incarcerations”, and loss of ability to produce food within the system.
Here yet again is another example why the Drug/Medical Mafiahate Vitamins and in particular Vitamin C! I am about to discuss/show how simple, not mention cost effective, it is to test efficacy of nutrients (at least on yourself). Naturally the medical Mafia refuses to do such research. They can then claim that there are no studies to support efficacy of nutrients/vitamins. Could it be that they are afraid of the results? What about the pretentious health agencies who are for ever trying to protect us from, generally non existent, harmful effects nutrients/vitamin yet look the other way form the real harm caused by drugs? Then to further add injury to insult they go to great lengths to hide good research or say the studies are old not done here (NIH syndrome (Not invented here) ) etc. etc. Then the crowning glory of excuses is that this or that symptoms conveniently named as a diseases be they glaucoma, diabetes etc. are incurable so why bother looking... And of course they are sweating night and day to manage these symptoms for you by developing this or that drug for each one of these symptoms...yea right!
Unlike drugs, that cause a multitude of problems (side effects) - addressing nutrient deficiencies often balances and provides the body with much needed building blocks to literally heal many, if not all, seemly non related other issues in the body. Here is a brilliant comment by Charlotte Gerson the daughter of late Dr. Max Gerson:
"When you heal the body - everything heals!" Need I say more?
You will see the wisdom of the above words throughout this information dense post....
For example:
"The patients experienced many other good side effects from vitamin C such as clearing of sinusitis, allergy symptoms, arthritis improvement, cholesterol lowering, laxative effect, diuretic effect for heart disease patients, and other improvements associated with vitamin C intake of “several grams per day” level. Ophthalmologists may awaken to the marvels of vitamin C in treating glaucoma!....
....Since vitamin C makes collagen needed to strengthen the blood vessel walls, diabetics quit bleeding in the retina and of course elsewhere in the body. This reduces the need for laser treatment to the retina and in many cases in the development of late glaucoma. In diabetes with an electron microscope the collagenous reticulum is absent at the site of retinal microaneurism. These develop in long standing diabetes and indicate a derangement in some slow metabolic process.(4)"
"In one report, a single dose of 500 mg/kg ascorbic acid reduced intreocular pressure in all of 39 patients with chronic open·angle glaucoma by an average of 16 mm Hg - although it usually caused gastrointestinal symptoms.
Also, ascorbic acid 100 to 150 mg/kg 3 to 5 times daily resulted in almost normal intraocular pressures in 15 out of 16 patients by 45 days, some of whom were uncontrollable with acetazolamide and 2% pilocarpine with only 3 to 4 days of gastrointestinal symptoms initially (Virno).
...in studies on rabbits, cod liver oil supplementation was found to lower intraocular pressure dramatically, while lard and safflower oil had no effect (Mancio)."
Also glaucoma, macular degeneration, cataract and the strengthening of the retina are all helped by vitamin C and it is most effective before the damage from these conditions develops.
Given my penchant for self sufficiency the use of topic vitamin C was just too irresistible - hence I came up with my own concoction that I and my wife have been using 3+ times a day as a preventative given that the lens loses about 1 percent of its transparency each year. The effects so far have been most gratifying. There is an immediate clarity in sight after use and the eyes feel wonderful. The experiment is still on and we will be doing some ongoing refinements in due course. But for now this works great and is a keeper....
Here is how to make your own eye drops* mix 1/4 teaspoon of ascorbic acid in 2 teaspoons (10 ml) of distilled water. 1/4 teaspoon is roughly 1 gram of ascorbic acid and one teaspoon is 5ml and vola you have the 10% vitamin C solution! It takes a while to mix in cold water (5+ minutes of mixing) so warm water (not hot) should dissolve the vitamin C faster. I hasten to add that this solution does sting at first as it is quite acidic. To prevent this, buffer the solution with 1/8 to 1/4 teaspoon of baking soda till yout are able to get some non sodium buffered ascorbic acid such C-Salts - use only high quality ascorbic acid powder as it will dissolve faster than the crystals. At the moment we are using 1/4 vitamin C with little more than 1/8 soda bicarbonate (this is a more comfortable) till we get some magnesium or potassium ascorbate. while one can use sodium ascorbate, I prefer to steer clear of anything that increases bodily fluid pressures - glaucoma or not. Do not use tablets as these are loaded with fillers etc.
Alternatively, one could try have a compounding pharmacy make you a stable, sterile and buffered 10% Vitamin C solution.
*Note: Vitamin C is stable when dry, but in solution it deteriorates as it is exposed to oxygen. Prepare this solution as close to the time of use as possible. It should be good for one day or so. A daily solution needs to be made. However, if the solution is prepared in syringe (thus removing any oxygen exposure) then it could be used till finished. You can add a drop or two of silver colloidal as a sterilizing agent if you like. Store the syringe in the refrigerate till all the solution is used up. It is important to not contaminate any of the ingredients and containers. Wash hands every time you use as there is a tendency to touch the eyes particularly if they burn...
My research indicates that one can have peripheral vision loss with or without high intraocular fluid pressure**. With proper building blocks (nutrients) one can strengthen the optical nerve to prevent the progression of peripheral vision loss regardless in intraocular fluid pressure. Clearly normal pressure will have less stress on the optical nerve - none the less one needs to strengthen the optical nerve regardless of normal eye fluid pressure.
"An open trial of 5 mg B12 daily in glaucoma patients found no change in IOP with supplementation. However, there was no progression of visual field loss during five years of follow-up.(87)"
87 Sakai T. Effect of long-term treatment of glaucoma with vitamin B12. Glaucoma 1992;14:167-170.
Hence, the vital nutrient vitamin B12 must not be overlooked.
"The Russians have pioneered the treatment of glaucoma with B12, observing improvement in half of a group of 46 patients receiving 1/10 milligram dose of B12 daily; (53) and a Japanese physician found that B12 injections improved various vision problems.(54)
Deafness (see below) is associated with B12 deficiency; supplements have been useful in treating tinnitus and noise-related hearing loss. (55)"
"Avoid taking excess vitamin C, especially for long periods. The ability of vitamin C to destroy B12 has been observed by several researchers--although this is disputed by others. Small amounts of natural vitamin C are a better choice than large amounts of synthetic vitamin C. (Herbert V and Das KC. Folic acid and vitamin B12. In: Shils ME, Olson JA, Shike M, eds. Modern Nutrition in Health and Disease. 8th ed. PhiladelphiaL Lea & Febiger, 1994:404.)"
Needless to say in addition to extra vitamin B12 a good B complex capsule is a good idea in any event. For better absorption open the capsule in some yogurt the night before and eat it with breakfast next morning. Or better still make your own as per:
...."The adrenal cortex, the outer layers of the adrenal glands which are located on top of your kidneys, is a treasure house of life-sustaining hormones. Among other duties, hormones of the adrenal cortex regulate your water balance and the electrolytes (minerals) essential to life. Dr. Josephson reasoned that since glaucoma was basically a problem of fluid control in the eye, too much in and too little out, a deficiency of the hormones of the adrenal cortex might be at least part of the problem. He proved to be right and, over his career, successfully treated many cases of glaucoma. In fact, he had a 72 percent success rate in early cases."...
As many of you know that often the cause of number of ailments often have a seemingly unrelated source - in this case the Kidney/Adrenal seems to be the case. By happenstance I came across a Hearing Loss Relief product by Bell Lifestyle that also contained raw adrenal, adrenal cortex extract (ACE) and kidney extracts to produce the body's own aldosterone.
Above again is another example of using natures methods (nutrients) to heal the body thus healing everything!
The following extract from the ISFR August 2008 Conference by Bill Osmunson DDS, MPH clearly shows increased mental retardation due to fluoride - one needs to be mindful of the of the fact that this shows a drop in IQ of all children but is easily overlooked in most with normal to high IQ. On the flip side, this needless, retardation clearly comes at the expense of those who could be potential genius' in our society - quite a price to pay!
See also:
1. NRC 2006 p 6
2. Lu Y, Sun ZR, Wu LN, Wang X, Lu W, Liu SS. Effect of high-fluoride water on intelligence in children. Fluoride 2000; 33:74-8.
2 Li XS, Zhi JL, Gao RO. Effect of fluoride exposure on intelligence in children. Fluoride 1995;28:189-92.
3 Zhao LB, Liang GH, Zhang DN, Wu XR. Effect of a high fluoride water supply on children’s intelligence. Fluoride 1996;29:190-2.
4. www.Fluoridealeart.org
What follows is a dramatic example on the effects of Fluoride on children.
Chris Gupta
-----------------------
Dr. Doris Rapp, MD, FAAA, FAEM, FAAP,Pediatric allergist and environmental medical specialist discusses one of her patients, an 8 year old girl who becomes depressed from ingesting fluoride.
After removing fluoride from her diet, this child's IQ went from 57 to 125 over a period of about 1 year, and her depression disappeared.
"Nutrient logic dictates that humans cannot thrive without key nutrients, and that today's health threats are simply the result of gaping nutrient deficiencies. In contrast to a focus on choking down symptom masking drugs, nutrient logic addresses the cause and conquers illness by filling the corresponding deficiency. The process is as simple and logical as resurrecting a dying, sun-deprived plant with sun exposure and water. A mountain of scientific evidence supports this logic if you really need proof. As a pharmaceutical chemist, I've been studying it for more than twenty years. And the evidence has always proven that nutrient logic can improve people's health while saving them money."
"Nutrient logic isn't alternative medicine. It's scientifically proven, evidence-based medicine supported by historical data as well as today's most advanced techniques of medicinal chemistry...." As usual the book sites full references to substantiate this.
This book does not discuss health at the "symptom level." but is based on body's most fundamental level, the cell. This gives "a vantage point by highlighting the biological mechanisms underlying the cause of symptoms before they develop. Monitoring cell function offers insight into our "health trajectory." That's far better than relying on shoddy studies bought and paid for by Big Pharma that simply study symptoms and the statistical associations that come with them.
Like mapping the flight path of an asteroid and predicting its location years from now, monitoring cellular function helps identify big health problems years or even decades before they start."
Shane Ellison's book cuts to the core and treads where few if any have gone. It teaches simple lifestyle changes along with navigation skills needed to overcome the hype from both the mainstream and alternative health self serving camps.
Third Reading of Bill C-6 is scheduled for next week's Senate Hearing. Please keep the letters going we need to delay the passing of C-6. The more we delay the better our chances of killing this bill. See example letters below
"Of course we all want our country to be safe from hazardous products. But let's not get suckered into believing that Health Canada's radical departure from our constitutional form of government is the only way to do it. There are simpler ways to accomplish Health Canada's professed objectives without trampling on our individual rights. We want consumers to be safe - without making business owners unsafe.
C-6 is the most protested piece of legislation in our entire 142-year history. Over 100,000 letters/faxes/emails received by senators and MPs attest to this fact. Listen to the people. We don't want legislation that violates our rights, especially when there are viable options which respect those rights.
Health Canada isn't telling the whole story. Yes, hazardous products do find their way into Canada. Yes, we need ways of minimizing these hazards. What Health Canada neglects to mention is that the Hazardous Products Act is working just fine. Voluntary recalls are up this year over last. What business person in his right mind isn't going to recall a dangerous product when asked to? Killing or injuring your customers isn't good for business.
Health Canada claims that they need mandatory recalls in order to do their job of protecting the public. If so, there is an incredibly simple solution: update the Hazardous Products Act to include mandatory recalls." DR
To send your letter please read the following and use a few introductory notes to the attachment (titled in red) below.
Cc: lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca, HarpeS@parl.gc.ca, "'Day, Joseph A.'" <DAYJA@sen.parl.gc.ca>, mccoye@sen.parl.gc.ca,
Dear Recently Appointed Senators:
You are able to vote independently on Bill C-6. Please do. It will be much better for Canadians if you vote your conscience rather than follow the party lines which may have inadvertently led us to the brink of a legislative disaster.
Continue reading "C-6 = Legislative Disaster"
CDW Secretariat <water_eau@hc-sc.gc.ca> [CDW = Federal-Provincial-Territorial Committee on Drinking Water, authors of report] Satish Deshpande <Satish.deshpande@ontario.ca> [Ontario Ministry of Environment, Department of Drinking Water Standards] Minister, MOE <minister.moe@ontario.ca> [Ontario Ministry of Environment] Environmental Commissioner of Ontario <commissioner@eco.on.ca>
For over 60 years we have been forced and subjected to water fluoridation without supportable scientific evidence on the efficacy of this substance. Now here again is - the total regurgitation of the same junk science*. It is abundantly clear that the panel for this Health Canada review was chosen specifically to continue this disgraceful tradition by deliberately cherry picking data to support a predetermined outcome!
Given the abundance of excellent science on Fluoride toxicity, it boggles the mind that this, supposed learned, panel could over look the following:
It is common sense, in that, we should not medicate anyone unless the dose is appropriate to the patient. Hence mass fluoride medication cannot be the same for a thirsty diabetic with comprised kidneys, a 3-year-old toddler and a 35-year-old construction worker. All should require different amounts of medication and not be subject to the same tolerances of this (or any) medication.
Clearly this dosage responsibility lies with each individual and her/his practitioner to determine for themselves.
How could this panel, of so called experts claim, such differing dosages are safe for all?
The real concerns of the community namely: the collateral damage such as, "impairments to the liver, kidney, brain, bones, pineal gland, thyroid, and yes - even teeth** (these too are clearly dependent on dosage and have severe effects on those with compromised nutrition, health and/or immune systems) are summarily ignored.
** They tell us that molted teeth from fluoridation of water is just a cosmetic effect. When in fact this is a proof positive sign of bone damage. In the British Medical Journal (B.M.J.), October 7, 2000 it is reported that 48% of children who live in fluoridated communities have developed dental fluorosis (damaged bone) due to fluoride overdose. Now then, if the bone is damaged how are you going to get fewer cavities? This demonstrates that ingesting of fluoridated water to reduce tooth decay is clearly a myth.
What expertize did this panel have on Fluoride's toxicity let alone on the untested waste substance hydrofluorosilcic acid (used to fluoridate) that contains variable quantities of arsenic, lead among other toxic residues?
We are not allowed to adulterate our foods with any amount of lead, arsenic etc. The panel failed to show, why such adulteration of water can be an exception?
Final submissions to the Canadian Drinking Water Secretariat (water_eau@hc-sc.gc.ca) are due this Friday, November 27, 2009. Please consider submitting a response to this document.
The well-known requirements of science are not sufficiently fulfilledin this document:
omission of citations for claims, (e.g., conflicting claims in the English and French translations had no citation to verify which claim was correct);
omissions of research which do not support conclusions, including research by panel members selected to do this review;
a review panel was chosen with conflicts of interest, and who demonstrate a lack of expertise in artificial water fluoridation;
misrepresentation the National Research Council Review 2006;
use of a double standard for claims of benefits and claims of harm whereby poor quality science demonstrating efficacy is accepted uncritically whereas claims of harm are dismissed if the evidence is not of the highest quality.
Any of the following peer-reviewed responses to the CDW secretariat are available for you to submit in whole or in part.
Here yet again is the classic strategy used over and over to deal with awkward issues pertaining to witnesses, scientific evidence etc. that comes in the way of predetermined policy in favour of the industry. This strategy is currently being used not only for Bill C-6 but also such issues as water fluoridation (more on this in another post) and vaccination among others...
The government regulatory agencies "are essentially public relations and diversionary arrangements to control and placate the masses. Contrary to perceptions, regulatory bodies are essential to protect the industry, consumer protection is incidental! Regulations favourable to industry are created in the name of health and safety such as testing their wares on animals etc. which often have no relations to human health and safety. Once passed the companies are then off the hook, the tax payer and the injured party/s are left holding the bag for subsequent problems and/or complications.... Agencies themselves, by design of course, are unaccountable and serve as a shield for the industry."
We need to expose these shenanigans and bring then to the attention of the Senate and ask for accountability of these actions....
Chris Gupta
--------------------
Hello Team,
Interesting times – Senate is not going to allow David and I to witness. I suspect that “THEY” are afraid of the uncontrollable on record evidence opposing Bill C-6.
See David’s excellent comments below.
Thanks.
TrueMan
------------------------
Please pass on to all who received rejection letters:
Senator Joseph Day is the official critic of Bill C-6 and thus could be our most important ally in the senate. He is most concerned that (a) the Social Affairs Committee was not given a list of those witnesses who have been excluded from testifying, (b) all of the witnesses thus far have discussed only policy considerations, and (c) no one has yet challenged the deeper issue of C-6’s unconstitutionality.
Clink on the following picture to hear a short (10 excerpt - part 2 below) from the full 46 minute "Power to the People" lecture as a primer to the questions and text below:
"Focus entirely on the constitutional and charter violations of C-6. Do NOT mention natural health products in any way, shape or form. If you do, you will likely be dismissed with a reply that C-6 specifically exempts NHPs. This is a bogus response. Schedule 1 of C-6 includes foods, drugs, cosmetics, devices and explosive. Schedule 1 can be revised at any time to include NHPs. Further, the Health Minister has another bill in the wings that specifically targets NHPs. If C-6 passes, then our industry is next, no matter what they say." DR
Following are links to the full lecture that will give you a good grounding how our government operates it is not what you think! This is a must listen. I have also uploaded this 46 minute lecture as a mp3 file here for the convenience for those who should like to hear this on the go. Unfortunately the first minute or so is very loud but the remainder is fine.
Extracted from: "Conférence pour la Liberté de Choix en Santé where you can hear other excellent speakers as well. There maybe both French and English translations on the above link too?
*Apparently, in view of the following deliberations "some Senators on the Committee reviewing Bill C-6 would be so afraid of my witness appearance that they are not only blocking me or David from appearing, but had arranged for a so-called “Consumer Advocate” that I do not even know to directly attack me in his limited 10 minute presentation." TT
Here yet again is another vested interest group masquerading as an environmental consumer group. Please read and post your own comments in the above link before they are removed.
Chris Gupta
----------------------------------
Hello FOFI GIA Freedom BeeHive Canadian Council & Network,
Please see attached part of our Canadian Coalition for Health Freedom analysis of C-6 that was handed out to MPs and Senators during my Oct 7th and 8th Ottawa trip. C-6 passed second reading on October 7th
I have updated our E-Protest online letter. Please encourage everyone to go to www.canadiancoalitionforhealthfreedom.ca and CLICK on the BIG RED STOP sign and send the new E-Protest letter to over 400 MPs and Senators. Please note that when you receive your confirmation e-mail – please ensure that the full link is used to finalize sending your E-Protest Freedom letter.
You need to call your MPs in your riding and go and meet with them to discuss your concerns.
We must unite and organize together riding by riding in order to develop enough focused PEOPLE PROTEST POWER to stop Bill C-6 and the soon to be re-introduced C-51.
We urgently need your help immediately to do the following:
These articles are brought to you strictly for educational and informational purposes.
Be sure to consult your health practitioner of choice prior to any specific use of any of the non drug device or food based medicinal products referenced herein.
The Ads are not a an endorsement of the webmasters or writers on this site
and are simply a means to facilitate our ability bring you more information
not generally available via mainstream media. You are encouraged to take
matters in your own hands with the tools and ideas provided on this site and
elsewhere.
