AIDS Experiments on Children in New York's Incarnation Center 'A Human Tragedy'

Categories

Epidemics

Liam Scheff is the author of a series of articles exposing the Incarnation Children's Center's cruel experimentation on children - often orphans - who are subjected to excruciating multiple drug "treatments" for having tested positive in so-called HIV/AIDS tests. Liam's original expose' "The House That AIDS Built" is here.

Liam Scheff is one of the very few courageous reporters who will not shut up to appease. His latest article: Orphans on Trial

HIV/AIDS tests are highly unscientific and according to their manufacturers are not a proper tool to establish infection. They do not prove, in other words, that a person is infected with any virus.

Nevertheless, these children, who have no parents to speak up for them, are held in the Incarnation clinic and are forcibly drugged. They are given some of the most damaging drugs the pharma giants have yet come up with. If they refuse, because the drugs make them feel miserable, they are forced to swallow them and if that force is not sufficient to "make them take their medicine", they are simply operated and fitted with a tube that goes directly into the stomach, so the drugs can be injected.

These children are crushed between the interests of a pharmaceutical industry gone completely out of control and the ability of their bodies to stand the treatment given to them.

Jon Rappoport of nomorefakenews.com has recently commented on this and has re-printed Liam Scheff's latest article, "Orphans on Trial", which should bring home the tragedy of the children in this New York "hospital". It is not beautiful to read but read it we must, if we are to put an end to the suffering of these children and thousands of other innocent victims of the pharmaceutical AIDS business.

LIAM SCHEFF WON'T QUIT TELLING THE TRUTH

JULY 14, 2004. Below, I’ve reprinted a brilliant and horrifying article by Liam Scheff, published in the NY Press.

That paper is to be commended for running Scheff’s piece.

This is a story where many repellent and criminal vectors intersect:

Poisoning by drugs.

Poisoning based on a failed and scientifically corrupt hypothesis that something called AIDS is caused by something called HIV.

The tireless arrogance of health care professionals.

The refusal of doctors to accept the fact that alternative remedies can heal.

The insane insistence that something called AIDS is, if untreated with drugs, a fatal disease.

The willingness to experiment with children’s lives, in a prison-like atmosphere where drugs are forcibly fed to the innocent.

The presumption that parents of children (especially poverty-stricken parents) have no rights to control treatment of their children.

The utilization of scientifically bankrupt diagnostic blood tests to falsely mark patients with a disease that REQUIRES poisonous drugs.

The disinterest of law enforcement authorities in punishing those who launch medical assaults on children.

Outright lying by medical professionals.

The unwillingness of major medical and religious institutions to investigate the medical projects they sponsor.

The justifying of poisonous medical experiments on the grounds that the (false) prognosis of death allows what amounts to the torture of children.

The placement of the poor into a special category---“anything can be done to them.”

The resurgence of Nazi-like medicine.

The bland adherence to a totally delusional scientific structure.

The bald assumption of intellectual and social and political superiority of the health professional.

The assertion of medical success in the face of horrifying outcomes.

The refusal to consider studies which contradict the poisonous treatment plan.

The refusal to closely examine studies which are funded and staffed by those who have an overriding money conflict of interest.

The refusal to think honestly about drugs which, by their very nature, destroy the foundations of biological life.

The assumption that, if most health professionals agree about the nature and diagnosis and treatment of a disease, THAT agreement alone constitutes unchallengeable science.

The dumping of cases in which people easily survive the criminal diagnosis by using alternative remedies (or no remedies at all) into a special category which, through devious manipulation, becomes “mysterious” and “unimportant” and “the rare exception to the rule.”

The assertion that conventional medical professionals should and do control the landscape.

The refusal to see and comprehend the terrible and monstrous effects of the drugs that are being delivered, as they are being delivered.

RICO murders being inflicted over a wide area in an easily recognizable pattern.

The equating of DEATH CAUSED with LIFE SUSTAINED.

The equating of LIFE SUSTAINED OUTSIDE THE MEDICAL PARAMETER with DEATH INFLICTED BY THE IGNORANT PARENT.

The medical destruction of the family.

ORPHANS ON TRIAL

(original here)

Abandoned kids are force-fed experimental AIDS drugs at a Catholic children's home in Washington Heights. And the city wants it that way.

By Liam Scheff

WHEN CHRISTINE MAGGIORE TESTED HIV-POSITIVE IN 1992, HER DOCTOR TOLD HER TO GET READY TO DIE. BUT SHE WASN'T INTERESTED IN DYING.
Maggiore was told that the AIDS drugs would make her sick, so she skipped them, instead relying on natural methods to support her health. A year and a half later, she was so healthy that her doctor said there was something wrong and she should retest.

She did retest, several times. The tests came back negative, indeterminate and positive. Maggiore investigated the medical literature and learned that HIV tests are highly inaccurate. She also discovered that there are gaping flaws in the HIV hypothesis itself.

Believing that this is the sort of thing people should know, she founded Alive & Well AIDS Alternatives, a resource for people who, like herself, want to make fully informed decisions about their health.

Since testing positive, Maggiore has had two children. Her kids, two and six years old, have never been tested. They've been raised on organic food, with a naturopathic approach to health. They're both intelligent and active. They don't take AIDS drugs. And they're not in the least bit sick. They regularly see their pediatrician, who has no medical complaints about their well-being.

And they're not alone. There are thousands of healthy HIV-positive people who don't take the drugs, who rely on natural regimens to support their immune function.

It was through Maggiore that I met Mona, whose children, Sean and Dana, have tested HIV-positive. By the state's definition, they're not actually her children; Mona is their great aunt and legal guardian. Her niece, a long-time drug user, was unable to act as a responsible mother, so Sean and Dana were remanded to state foster care. Mona took them back to raise as her own.

When I first spoke with Mona, she was stressed and nervous. Sean had twice been sent to the Incarnation Children's Center (ICC), a "home for HIV positive children" located in Washington Heights. First, as an infant, then again four years ago. And Dana was there until June.
"Why did they take her?" I asked.

"They said I was a negligent parent because I didn't want to give the drugs."

She'd been taking Sean and Dana to a naturopath. That the children were healthy didn't matter. When city agencies found out that the children weren't on the drugs, they took them away for mandatory treatment at a clinic and then transferred them to ICC. There, they were locked up and pumped full of drugs day and night.

"What drugs?"

"AZT, Nevirapine, Epivir, Zerit. All kinds of drugs."

To read through the list of drug studies either currently underway or recently concluded at IC—studies sponsored by government agencies such as National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and huge pharmaceutical companies such as Glaxo, Pfizer, Squibb and Genentech—is to take a trip through the nightmare world of pediatric drug research.

For example, the study called "The Effect of Anti-HIV Treatment on Body Characteristics of HIV-Infected Children" is looking for the causes of "Wasting and Lipodystrophy [fat redistribution]"—by using drugs known to cause wasting and lipodystrophy.

Or consider "The Safety and Effectiveness of Treating Advanced AIDS Patients between the Ages of 4 and 22 with Seven Drugs, Some at Higher than Usual Doses." The seven drugs in the study are all known to cause debilitating, potentially fatal side effects, yet they are administered at "higher than usual doses" in four-year-olds.

Then there's a study with "Stavudine…Alone or in Combination with Didanosine." Stavudine plus Didanosine has killed pregnant women.

Or the vaccine study to be administered to children "12 months to 8 years" using "live chicken pox virus," even though one of the consequences of a live virus vaccine can be the disease itself.

Another measures "HIV Levels in Cerebrospinal Fluid." Cerebrospinal fluid can only be gathered from a spinal tap, a dangerous and invasive procedure.

There's even a study on HIV-negative children born to HIV-infected mothers that uses an experimental HIV vaccine.

Mona was never informed that Sean had once participated in clinical trials at ICC.
"But they're always changing the children's medications," she said.

I asked Mona how the children tolerate so many medications.

A lot of them don't, she told me. "The ones that can't are drugged through a tube…in their stomachs. If a child refuses drugs too many times, they take them away for the operation. I've seen it happen to children who refuse the medication."

INCARNATION CHILDREN'S CENTER is a foster home administered by the Catholic Home Bureau under the Archdiocese of New York. According to the ICC website, it was established in 1987 "to deal with the boarder baby crisis." Boarder babies are children abandoned at the hospital.

In 1992, "an outpatient clinic for HIV-positive children was established" and, with funding from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which is a subdivision of the National Institutes for Health (NIH), "the clinic became a subunit of the Columbia University Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Unit."

That's when ICC went from being a home for children of impoverished, drug-addicted mothers to a recipient of funds for allowing the NIH to use these HIV-positive orphans as test subjects.

The ICC webpage listed dozens of trials with AZT and Nevirapine conducted through the late 90s. The NIH site recently listed "[f]ive studies currently recruiting for drug trials," and "27 studies ongoing or recently completed"—all on children at ICC—as well as more than 200 at Columbia Presbyterian, ICC's parent hospital. The studies are sponsored by NIH subdivisions; many are cosponsored by the pharmaceutical companies that manufacture the drugs being tested. The studies use the standard AIDS drugs: nucleoside analogues, protease inhibitors and Nevirapine.

Nucleoside analogues, like AZT, work by stopping cell division. They stop the formation of new blood in the bone marrow, in some cases causing anemia and bone marrow death. They'