Health Supreme by Sepp Hasslberger

Networking For A Better Future - News and perspectives you may not find in the media

Networking For A Better Future - News and perspectives you may not find in the media

Health Supreme

News Blog

Site Map

NewsGrabs

Economy

Environment

Epidemics

Food for Thought

Health

Human Potential

Legislation

Pharma

Science

Society

Technology

The Media

War Crimes

 


Articles Archive

 

See also:

 

Communication Agents:

INACTIVE  Ivan Ingrilli
  Chris Gupta
  Tom Atlee
INACTIVE  Emma Holister
  Rinaldo Lampis
  Steve Bosserman
  CA Journal

 

Robin Good's
Web sites:

 

Activism:

 

AIDS:

 

Vaccines:

 

Pharma:

 

Information:

 

The Individual - Human Ability:

 

Society - Politics:

 

Economy:

 

Technology:

 

March 31, 2004

EU Commissioner Byrne: No Zero Risk Society

In a recent seminar on public risk perception, the EU's Health and Consumer Affairs Commissioner David Byrne made a revealing statement. He told us that there is no such thing as a zero risk society.

While I agree with what he says, I find it interesting that this statement comes at a time when the EU is discussing controls of toxic chemicals and when there is pressure from the chemical industry to water-down the proposed controls.

In contrast, when the EU was quietly passing restrictions to the availability of vitamins and minerals in food supplements just two years ago, the talk was different: "... the most important aim of the Directive is to ensure a high level of protection for the consumer", said Byrne on that occasion. The directive will be limiting availability of supplements based on alleged reasons of "consumer protection". No safety issues on vitamins or on natural products in general have been raised with any degree of seriousness, yet the controls were slapped on without mercy, benefiting ultimately the multinational chemical/pharmaceutical manufacturers.

Double talk? Double standard?

Now here is the recent statement from Commissioner Byrne who tells us we must face the risks [of chemicals] because otherwise, "there is a very real danger that an “anti-science” agenda may take root in European society". Just wondering why sometimes it is ok to have a risk and other times it is not...

There is no zero risk society

(Original available here)

Science has an important role in shaping public attitude to risk

Despite the development of a very important corpus of EU and national legislation to protect EU citizens against currently identified risks, several studies show that contradictory opinions about perceived risks remain important among national stakeholders groups.

“Unfortunately, because of the inconsistencies and contradictions in how the public perceives risk, all our efforts may not be enough. If we fail to make progress [in understanding risk perception], there is a very real danger that an “anti-science” agenda may take root in European society – leading to a society hampered and restricted by a collective neurosis, lacking in self confidence, resistant to innovation and unwilling to embrace change. We must not be deluded by the sometimes seductive, yet false, notion of a zero risk society,” said Commissioner Byrne.

Mr. Arias Cañete told the conference; “In the developed world, the taking of risk is not only an intrinsic condition of life, it is also essential to economic and social development. The key is to know what level of risk we can accept."


See also related articles:

EU Commissioner snubs nutrition

Managing Risk Perception - Trust and Transparency

EU to extend concept of medicine - eliminate "borderline products"

Risk Free Vitamins - How Safe is Safe Enough?

Are RDA Nutrient Levels Safe?

London High Court Hears EU Supplements Challenge

According to this article in 'Alive', ill feeling towards the EU could 'reach the point where it threatens the EU itself'. No wonder with the kind of legislation that is being introduced, quite apart from whether the legislators and the Commission believe they are acting in defense of consumer choice and safety...

 


posted by Sepp Hasslberger on Wednesday March 31 2004
updated on Tuesday December 21 2010

URL of this article:
http://www.communicationagents.com/sepp/2004/03/31/eu_commissioner_byrne_no_zero_risk_society.htm

 

 

 

 


Readers' Comments


See also: The Medical Mafia rules:

Posted by: Chris Gupta on March 31, 2004 05:47 PM

 


Thank you, Chris, for the reference. Here's a comment received by e-mail and my answer to it:

First the comment:

I’d say that Mr. Byrne is a rather confused person. I don’t have a clue what he’s saying. I guess he was trying to hide something he didn’t want to say in clear(er) terms.

And here my answer:

Byrne either has not much in his head or he is not honest.

In fact, his statement was made at a time when the big petrochempharma producers are pushing for a relaxing of the rules - as the EU is discussing a directive that will require the compulsory safety testing and approval of a lot of chemicals on the market.

So Byrne, after making sure we don't get poisoned by too much of a good thing (vitamins and other nutritious goodies) is now having to go in the opposite direction. That is because his paymasters, the petrochempharma people, have two arms that both want the best of the regulatory world: Pharma wants no supplements = protect the consumers, and Petrochem wants to poison us without too much trouble = consumers should't be such spoilsports.

That is what apparently the new subject of "risk perception" is all about: Consumers have to be taught to properly perceive the different risks they face. Presumably we should be much more afraid of the occasional side effect from taking a supplement than we are of - let's say - breathing in cancer-causing benzene or finding chemical residues in our drinking water. Anyway, Byrne was speaking at a risk perception conference - incredible what distortions of reality we're supposed to accept in the name of someone making a fat profit!

Posted by: Sepp on March 31, 2004 07:20 PM

 


Another comment by e-mail, from a friend in New Zealand:

Don't forget to point out that use of supplements is voluntary --- chemical residues and additives is involuntary... big difference in Risk Management terms... higher risks are acceptable if people knowingly engage an activity and can bail out if they want...

For the record, ten people have died in NZ climbing on and around our largest mountain this summer ... 200 in total ever... not one call for regulation or banning of such voluntary activity...

Posted by: Sepp on April 1, 2004 03:02 PM

 


Here is yet another comment received by e-mail:

This is typical of our double speak politicians. Nowadays you can take almost everything they say to mean the opposite. Frightening when people don't realise this.

Posted by: Sepp on April 1, 2004 04:59 PM

 















Security code:




Please enter the security code displayed on the above grid


Due to our anti-spamming policy the comments you are posting will show up online within few hours from the posting time.



 

   

The Individual Is Supreme And Finds Its Way Through Intuition

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

These articles are brought to you strictly for educational and informational purposes. Be sure to consult your health practitioner of choice before utilizing any of the information to cure or mitigate disease. Any copyrighted material cited is used strictly in a non commercial way and in accordance with the "fair use" doctrine.

 

1057



Enter your Email


Powered by FeedBlitz

 

 

Most Popular Articles
Lipitor: Side Effects And Natural Remedy

Lipitor - The Human Cost

Fluoride Accumulates in Pineal Gland

Original blueprints for 200 mpg carburetor found in England

Medical system is leading cause of death and injury in US

Aspartame and Multiple Sclerosis - Neurosurgeon's Warning

'Bird Flu', SARS - Biowarfare or a Pandemic of Propaganda?

 

 

More recent articles
European Food Safety Authority cherry picks evidence - finds Aspartame completely safe

Did Aspartame kill Cory Terry?

Retroviral particles in human immune defenses - is AIDS orthodoxy dead wrong?

Vaccine damage in Great Britain: The consequences of Dr Wakefield’s trials

European Union seeks consumer input on organic agriculture

A Seed for Change - Greek film maker says we can 'grow our way out of the crisis'


Archive of all articles on this site

 

 

Most recent comments
South Africa: Traditional Medicine to Fight AIDS, Poverty

Greek lawyers initiate case before International Criminal Court

Lipitor, Zocor, Pravachol: Cholesterol Lowering Drugs Cause Cancer?

FDA vs. Jason - and vitamin B17

Life And Gravity: Sleeping In A Horizontal Position May Be Bad For You

 

 

Candida International

What Does MHRA Stand For??

Bono and Bush Party without Koch: AIDS Industry Makes a Mockery of Medical Science

Profit as Usual and to Hell with the Risks: Media Urge that Young Girls Receive Mandatory Cervical Cancer Vaccine

 

Share The Wealth

Drinking Water Fluoridation is Genotoxic & Teratogenic

Democracy At Work? - PPM On Fluoride

"Evidence Be Damned...Patient Outcome Is Irrelevant" - From Helke

Why Remove Fluoride From Phosphate Rock To Make Fertilizer

FOFI Codex Meeting Report On Labelling May 9 - 13, 2011

 

Evolving Collective Intelligence

Let Us Please Frame Collective Intelligence As Big As It Is

Reflections on the evolution of choice and collective intelligence

Whole System Learning and Evolution -- and the New Journalism

Gathering storms of unwanted change

Protect Sources or Not? - More Complex than It Seems

 

Consensus

Islanda, quando il popolo sconfigge l'economia globale.

Il Giorno Fuori dal Tempo, Il significato energetico del 25 luglio

Rinaldo Lampis: L’uso Cosciente delle Energie

Attivazione nei Colli Euganei (PD) della Piramide di Luce

Contatti con gli Abitanti Invisibili della Natura

 

Diary of a Knowledge Broker

Giving It Away, Making Money

Greenhouses That Change the World

Cycles of Communication and Collaboration

What Is an "Integrated Solution"?

Thoughts about Value-Add

 

 

 

Best sellers from