Health Supreme by Sepp Hasslberger

Networking For A Better Future - News and perspectives you may not find in the media

Networking For A Better Future - News and perspectives you may not find in the media

Health Supreme

News Blog

Site Map

NewsGrabs

Economy

Environment

Epidemics

Food for Thought

Health

Human Potential

Legislation

Pharma

Science

Society

Technology

The Media

War Crimes

 


Articles Archive

 

See also:

 

Communication Agents:

INACTIVE  Ivan Ingrilli
  Chris Gupta
  Tom Atlee
INACTIVE  Emma Holister
  Rinaldo Lampis
  Steve Bosserman
  CA Journal

 

Robin Good's
Web sites:

 

Activism:

 

AIDS:

 

Vaccines:

 

Pharma:

 

Information:

 

The Individual - Human Ability:

 

Society - Politics:

 

Economy:

 

Technology:

 

May 07, 2008

Canada: Bill C-51 threatens natural health products

On April 8th, Canada’s Minister of Health, Tony Clement, introduced Bill C-51 into the House of Commons. If passed, that bill will drastically alter the current Food and Drugs Act, and that will be bad news for many Canadians. According to an article on the Common Ground website, "expectations are that if Federal Bill C-51 is passed, around 75 percent of new applications will most likely fail to meet new requirements."


cartoon_bitmp.jpg


Canada has traditionally been liberal, favoring availability of nutrient-containing products to people wishing to use vitamins and minerals for their preventive or even curative health needs. But some time in the 90s, a world wide campaign was started to curtail the use of nutritional supplements in health care in favor of pharmaceutical medicines.

The US FDA's intention to limit vitamin dosages to RDA levels was blocked by an overwhelming consumer driven campaign which eventually resulted in liberal legislation, the so-called Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA) in 1993/94. In Europe, the early 90s saw the first attempt to pass a food supplements law, which after some delay was issued in 2004 as the Food Supplements Directive. Codex Alimentarius started talking about limiting supplements in 1994. More recently, Australia and New Zealand were supposed to harmonize in the direction of Australia's restrictive model which considers supplements "therapeutic goods" or medicines. New Zealand has successfully resisted so far. In Canada, there was resistance to change and finally a parliamentary committee was charged with finding a way to control supplements.

Shawn Buckley's Common Ground article gives some specifics on what happened before the introduction of the recent bill:

On November 4, 1998, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Health tabled its report, titled “Natural Health Products: A New Vision”. The report contained 53 recommendations, all of which were accepted by the Government on March 2, 1999. The first recommendation read that "Health Canada, in conjunction with a new separate Natural Health Products Expert Advisory Committee (EAC) should set out an appropriate definition of natural health products (NHPs) and amend the Food and Drugs Act accordingly." However, for expediency, a regulatory definition was created and implemeted instead of amending the law; Natural Health Products (NHPs) would be considered as drugs under the Food and Drugs Act. In Health Canada's page of Frequently Asked Questions, the following response was given for the question of why the Act was not amended:

"While creating another category distinct from both food and drugs was considered, an amendment at the level of the Act would have been necessary. Due to the timelines and legislative process required for a change of this magnitude, it was decided that natural health products would be considered drugs under the Act, but with a set of regulations specific to NHPs."

In effect, Health Canada is stating that they chose not to implement the direction of the government, but there was a good reason - amending the Act would take a long time and be a lot of work. However, on April 8, 2008, the Minister of Health introduced Bill C-51, An act to amend the Food and Drugs Act. This legislation introduces new definitions, including a new product category called "therapeutic products", a term that encompasses drugs, medical devices and cells used for therapeutic purposes. Despite there being an opportunity to amend the Act, an opportunity to amend definitions in the Act and include a decade-old Government directive to include Natural Health Products as a separate legal category, drafters of the bill chose not to. The question remains: why?

In effect, parliamentary deliberations were held in Canada and the results published, but the recommendations were disregarded. Did they simply not fit the broader agenda which commenced in the early 90s, of doing away with supplements as a competing approach to pharmaceuticals world wide in public health systems?

- - -

Calls to Action

There are several Calls to action for Canadians to contact their representatives and tell them to oppose and stop Bill C-51.


home_c51.jpg


One of them is on www.stopc51.com (link no longer active). A major complaint is that the bill would allow administrators to set new laws on supplements, effectively bypassing the law-giving powers of Parliament. The site states that

Section 30(7) of Bill C-51 eliminates the Ability of our Elected Officials to Protect Us

1. Bypassing our elected official’s ability to vote out laws that are not the will of, or in the interest of the Canadian people.

2. Allows government agents, (not elected officials) to create binding laws behind closed doors.

3. New powers will allow enforcement of these laws by the searching and seizing of private property and bank accounts without warrants.


Global Research.Ca states in an article that Bill C-51, if passed into law, will "Outlaw 60% of Natural Health Products" and points to a rally in front of Calgary Federal Court on May 9, 2008, to "protest C-51 and help protect people's access to natural health products".


The Republican Party of Ontario on http://www.helpstopbillc51.ca/ provides information and asks Canadians to help stop bills C-51.

For several years now there has been an effort on the part of the WHO and the WTO to bring in a common international standard for health products. In 2009 signatory states, like Canada, are obliged to adopt standards and guidelines that were laid down by the Codex Alimentarius Commission.

Sections of Bill C-51 (section 30, paragraphs 7 - 9) will enable Health Canada to implement the Codex within Canada without adequate public consultation. The amendments could restrict the level of dosage available in nutritional supplements to questionable low levels. Dosages above a certain as yet unknown threshold could require a prescription from a physician.


The National Health Products Protection Association, under the headline Natural Health Products are Under Immediate Threat states that 75 % of natural health products could become illegal under the proposed law. The anti-supplement slant of the proposal is clear, they say, when considering the following:

There has never been a death in Canada caused by a natural health product. Considering that there are multiple deaths every year caused by common foods such as peanuts and shellfish, it is clear that natural health products are extremely safe. When you consider the health benefits of natural health products, including that many of us rely upon them for our very lives, it becomes clear that the real danger in regulating them is to “over-regulate” them off of the market.


The situation appears grave, and unless Canadians can prevail on their parliamentarians to put their foot down and say NO to the proposed laws that would give inordinate powers to the health authorities, natural health options may be severely limited.


See also:


Action: Canada: Stop Bill C-51
The Canadian government, afraid of the public reaction once people find out what they are trying to pull, is currently fast-tracking a Bill which threatens to strip you of your rights to access a wide range of natural health products. If it passes, and you buy/sell/share/collect/dry/eat/feed to your family any of the restricted stuff, you become a criminal subject to fines 1000X bigger than those currently in effect.

Canada’s C-51 Law To Outlaw 60% of Natural Health Products

Republican Party of Ontario

Health Action Network Society

The Natural Health Produces Protection Association

Canadian Coalition for Health Freedom

http://www.healthcanadaabuse.com/

Canada: Bill C-51 - May 8th 2008 - Canadian Coalition for Health Freedom
"THEY will make a critical decision on Thursday May 8th 2008 on whether to schedule Bill C-51 on next week's order paper. IT IS CRITICAL THAT YOU KEEP UP THE PROTESTS AND WE HAVE CREATED A SPECIAL WEBSITE TO ASSIST IN THIS go to www.helpstopbillc51.ca and / or www.healthcanadaabuse.com and send the E-Action Protest letters immediately."

 


posted by Sepp Hasslberger on Wednesday May 7 2008
updated on Friday June 26 2009

URL of this article:
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2008/05/07/canada_bill_c51_threatens_natural_health_products.htm

 


Related Articles

S1082: Will FDA Do Away With Pharma's Competition?
The FDA and the drug companies have been very close for some time now, but a new bill, S1082, introduced in the US Senate by Edward Kennedy and Michael Enzi is proposing to arrange a marriage between Big Pharma and its regulatory agency. The drug companies bring a rich dowry, instalments are already being paid through the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) which has allowed the drug companies to... [read more]
April 26, 2007 - Sepp Hasslberger

Food Supplements in Europe - What is the Problem?
The European Union has issued a Directive to regulate the commerce of food supplements, which is in the process of being implemented in the member states. If reading the referenced text does not tell you what problems this directive might bring to your ability to either buy or sell supplements in one of the European Community member states, don't feel alone. That is a problem most observers have and I... [read more]
April 21, 2004 - Sepp Hasslberger

Europe Sharply Divided over Vitamin Supplements
A consultation by the European Commission intended to pave the way for setting dosage limits for vitamins and minerals in supplements and foods sold in the EU is showing up deep divisions among member states and groups with an interest in nutrition and supplementation. The European Directive on Food Supplements mandates dosage levels to be considered and limits to be set where needed. At the time of its passage, the... [read more]
December 06, 2006 - Sepp Hasslberger

New Zealand: Supplements to be 'Medicines'
For Europeans and Americans, New Zealand and Australia seem so far away we don't usually think that what happens "down under" is going to affect us in any way. Better think twice. What is happening there does have relevance to us. In fact we are facing attempts by the European Union and by the FDA to "regulate" supplements that are not dissimilar to what is happening on the other side... [read more]
May 10, 2004 - Sepp Hasslberger

Australia/New Zealand Health Agency - NZ Parliament Committee Disagrees
Health conscious New Zealanders are facing a threat to their freedom to choose natural products for taking care of their health. According to an agreement between the governments of New Zealand and Australia, signed in December 2003, Natural Health Products are to be regulated by a joint agency modelled after the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration. That agency has shown an extremely heavy-handed approach to supplements when last year in April,... [read more]
August 05, 2004 - Sepp Hasslberger

Codex Alimentarius: Will EU Laws Become World Standard?
In a recent article, The Economist discusses How the European Union is becoming the world's chief regulator. The article says the EU regulatory framework is in the process of becoming "world standard". The Economist quotes an unnamed US official: One American official says flatly that the EU is “winning” the regulatory race, adding: “And there is a sense that that is their precise intent.” He cites a speech by the... [read more]
October 15, 2007 - Sepp Hasslberger

 

 

 


Readers' Comments


Hi Tony Clemmet;
If you don't stop the bill C-51, you are the monster killer in the word histories.
Please don't kill your families and others who need the vitamins and supplements to keep humans healthy.

Posted by: Diana B. T. Clark on May 24, 2008 01:46 PM

 


The bill is long overdue. At least some products of an unknown origin will be tested. Although it's not a common knowledge, many random tests have revealed the presence of led and other heavy metals, and sometimes radioactive substances in so called natural health products imported from China and other Asian countries. Many users will end up with less expensive and not glowing urine.

Posted by: Zygmunt Janiewicz on June 6, 2008 11:51 PM

 


Looks to me that you publish only comments you like. I've retained a printed off page of my first posting and, be sure, it'll be handed over to my MP together with my support of the bill. For your info I've been an alpine skiing coach for quite a long time and had access to laboratory test results of some "health products" and "food supplements", especially those imported from Asian countries (or made of imported ingredients). Most of them weren't so healthy, some had traces of heavy metals, others traces of radioactivity.

Posted by: Zygmunt Janiewicz on June 7, 2008 02:52 PM

 


Please stop bill C-51. do not be a dictator. yous truly Joe

Posted by: Joe Vandenberg on June 12, 2008 06:43 PM

 


I believe that these supplements do need to be regulated. My mother in law has spent a small fortune on them and believes everything the sales person tells her about them, and there's nothing stopping the salesperson from saying you should take 6 of these a day, instead of the 1 that is probably adequate, therefore making her 6x more profit, she's also convinced her not to take anything prescribed by a doctor, because the doctors are lining their pockets with each rx written, I think the supplement salesperson is lining their pockets a lot more than the doctors are and they need to be controlled!

Posted by: Joan smith on July 4, 2008 12:51 AM

 


you make little sense there, Joan. Supplements need to be regulated because your mother in law spends money on them? That doesn't sound like a good reason, and if there were to be regulations on supplements, they certainly would not prohibit people from selling them and others from buying them.

Posted by: Sepp on September 24, 2008 03:55 PM

 















Security code:




Please enter the security code displayed on the above grid


Due to our anti-spamming policy the comments you are posting will show up online within few hours from the posting time.



 

   

The Individual Is Supreme And Finds Its Way Through Intuition

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

These articles are brought to you strictly for educational and informational purposes. Be sure to consult your health practitioner of choice before utilizing any of the information to cure or mitigate disease. Any copyrighted material cited is used strictly in a non commercial way and in accordance with the "fair use" doctrine.

 

3105



Enter your Email


Powered by FeedBlitz

 

 

Most Popular Articles
Lipitor: Side Effects And Natural Remedy

Lipitor - The Human Cost

Fluoride Accumulates in Pineal Gland

Original blueprints for 200 mpg carburetor found in England

Medical system is leading cause of death and injury in US

Aspartame and Multiple Sclerosis - Neurosurgeon's Warning

'Bird Flu', SARS - Biowarfare or a Pandemic of Propaganda?

 

 

More recent articles
Chromotherapy in Cancer

Inclined Bed Therapy: Tilt your bed for healthful sleep

European Food Safety Authority cherry picks evidence - finds Aspartame completely safe

Did Aspartame kill Cory Terry?

Retroviral particles in human immune defenses - is AIDS orthodoxy dead wrong?

Vaccine damage in Great Britain: The consequences of Dr Wakefield’s trials


Archive of all articles on this site

 

 

Most recent comments
Uganda: Pfizer Sponsored AIDS Institute Snubs Natural Treatment Options

Lipitor: Side Effects And Natural Remedy

AIDS: 'No Gold Standard' For HIV Testing

Lipitor: Side Effects And Natural Remedy

'Global Business Coalition' Wants More Testing: But Tests Do Not Show AIDS

 

 

Candida International

What Does MHRA Stand For??

Bono and Bush Party without Koch: AIDS Industry Makes a Mockery of Medical Science

Profit as Usual and to Hell with the Risks: Media Urge that Young Girls Receive Mandatory Cervical Cancer Vaccine

 

Share The Wealth

Artificial Water Fluoridation: Off To A Poor Start / Fluoride Injures The Newborn

Drinking Water Fluoridation is Genotoxic & Teratogenic

Democracy At Work? - PPM On Fluoride

"Evidence Be Damned...Patient Outcome Is Irrelevant" - From Helke

Why Remove Fluoride From Phosphate Rock To Make Fertilizer

 

Evolving Collective Intelligence

Let Us Please Frame Collective Intelligence As Big As It Is

Reflections on the evolution of choice and collective intelligence

Whole System Learning and Evolution -- and the New Journalism

Gathering storms of unwanted change

Protect Sources or Not? - More Complex than It Seems

 

Consensus

Islanda, quando il popolo sconfigge l'economia globale.

Il Giorno Fuori dal Tempo, Il significato energetico del 25 luglio

Rinaldo Lampis: L'uso Cosciente delle Energie

Attivazione nei Colli Euganei (PD) della Piramide di Luce

Contatti con gli Abitanti Invisibili della Natura

 

Diary of a Knowledge Broker

Giving It Away, Making Money

Greenhouses That Change the World

Cycles of Communication and Collaboration

What Is an "Integrated Solution"?

Thoughts about Value-Add

 

 

 

Best sellers from