Health Supreme by Sepp Hasslberger

Networking For A Better Future - News and perspectives you may not find in the media

Networking For A Better Future - News and perspectives you may not find in the media

Health Supreme

News Blog

Site Map

NewsGrabs

Economy

Environment

Epidemics

Food for Thought

Health

Human Potential

Legislation

Pharma

Science

Society

Technology

The Media

War Crimes

 


Articles Archive

 

See also:

 

Communication Agents:

INACTIVE  Ivan Ingrilli
  Chris Gupta
  Tom Atlee
INACTIVE  Emma Holister
  Rinaldo Lampis
  Steve Bosserman
  CA Journal

 

Robin Good's
Web sites:

 

Activism:

 

AIDS:

 

Vaccines:

 

Pharma:

 

Information:

 

The Individual - Human Ability:

 

Society - Politics:

 

Economy:

 

Technology:

 

May 07, 2004

Aspartame Gate: When Donald Rumsfeld was CEO of Searle

As calls for US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to resign are prompting questions from Senators, about possible breakdowns in the Pentagon chain of command leading to prisoner abuse in Iraq, Betty Martini founder of Mission Possible, an international 'Aspartame resistance' movement, writes to Senator Biden to explain that allowing torture of prisoners in Iraq may not have been the only reprehensible action Rumsfeld should answer for.

Martini says that Aspartame, a toxic sweetener approved against better scientific judgement by an FDA Commissioner personally installed by Rumsfeld when he was working on president Reagan's transition team, is killing thousands and the evidence is being covered up by a pliant FDA. Will Rumsfeld fall over what someone has already called Gulag Gate? - or might he fall victim to the FDA's and his own involvement in what more and more starts to look like Aspartame Gate?

Read Betty Martini's letter to Senator Biden here:

URL: http://www.aspartamekills.com and www.wnho.net

Sender: bettym19@pop.mindspring.com
Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 14:26:40 -0400
To: Senator@Biden.Senate.gov
From: "Dr. Betty Martini"
Subject: Senator Biden, More damning information on Rumsfeld you may not know


Dear Senator Biden:

The news talks about you asking Donald Rumsfeld to step down which has to do with the Iraq situation.

I would like to call your attention to when Donald Rumsfeld was CEO of Searle, manufacturers of aspartame. For 16 years the FDA refused to approve it, not only because its not safe but because they wanted the company indicted for fraud. Both U.S. Prosecutors hired on with the defense team and the statute of limitations expired. They were Sam Skinner and William Conlon. Skinner went on to become Secretary of Transportation squelching the cries of the pilots who were by now having seizures on this seizure triggering drug, aspartame, and then Chief of Staff under President Bush's father. Some of these people reach high places. Even Supreme Justice Clarence Thomas is a former Monsanto attorney. (Monsanto bought Searle in l985, and sold it a few years ago). When Ashcroft became Attorney General, Thompson from King and Spalding Attorneys (another former Monsanto attorney) became deputy under Ashcroft. (Attorneys for NutraSweet and Coke).

However, the FDA still refused to allow NutraSweet on the market. It is a deadly neurotoxic drug masquerading as an additive. It interacts with all antidepressants, L-dopa, Coumadin, hormones, insulin, all cardiac medication, and many others. It also is a chemical hypersensitization drug so that it interacts with vaccines, other toxins, other unsafe sweeteners like Splenda which has a chlorinated base like DDT and can cause autoimmune disease. It has a synergistic and additive effect with MSG. (www.truthinlabeling.org). Both being excitotoxins, the aspartic acid in aspartame, and MSG, the glutamate people were found using aspartame as the placebo for MSG studies, even before it was approved. The FDA has known this for a quarter of a century and done nothing even though its against the law. Searle went on to build a NutraSweet factory and had $9 million worth of inventory.

Donald Rumsfeld was on President Reagan's transition team and the day after he took office he appointed an FDA Commissioner who would approve aspartame. The FDA set up a Board of Inquiry of the best scientists they had to offer, who said aspartame is not safe and causes brain tumors, and the petition for approval is hereby revoked. The new FDA Commissioner, Arthur Hull Hayes, over-ruled that Board of Inquiry and then went to work for the PR Agency of the manufacturer, Burson-Marsteller, at a rumored $1000.00 a day, and has refused to talk to the press ever since. Read the whole story of the history of aspartame at http://www.wnho.net/history_of_aspartame.htm This will tell you everything you need to know. Rumsfeld calling in his markers is even documented in the congressional record!

In order to get it in other countries, Searle made a business deal with Professor Paul Turner in England. They knew if England found out the FDA wanted them indicted for fraud it could never get approved. Parliament found out and there was a big blow out but the order was never rescinded. The story was in the Guardian. Now all they had to do was rubberstamp this deadly poison around the world.

There were three congressional hearings because of the outcry of the people being poisoned. Senator Orrin Hatch refused to allow hearings for a long time. The first hearing was in 1985, and Senator Hatch and others were paid by Monsanto. So the bill by Senator Metzenbaum never got out of committee. This bill would have put a moratorium on aspartame, and [would have] had the NIH do independent studies on the problems being seen in the population, interaction with drugs, seizures, what it does to the fetus and even behavioral problems in children. This is due to the depletion of serotonin caused by the phenylalanine in aspartame.

I spoke to the European Union a couple of years ago and brought them the damning government records so they would know that aspartame was never proven safe. This was at the time they were going to write a new report, again because of the outcry on aspartame. I also gave them some of Monsanto's flawed research and showed them what they had done. You can't show a poison to be safe on studies without fixing them. But those from industry were part of the committee so what the EU did was eliminate all the damning research and use the flawed. They didn't even look at their own research. It was as if they were making it up as they went along. See the rebuttal to the EU report on www.wnho.net Click on aspartame.

With regard to Desert Storm Syndrome, you may recall the government did a study and came up with Lou Gehrigs. The pop companies sent aspartame laced pop to the Persian Gulf to sit in the 120 degree Arabian sun and break down to formaldehyde cocktails. Go to www.mpwhi.com/main.htm and read the protest of the National Soft Drink Association and you'll see they said it decomposes at 86 degrees. So the pop companies knew the gun was loaded. The NSDA also quoted the law that said it's illegal to put anything in carbonated beverages that decomposes or adulterates the drink. Yet the pop companies turned around and added it to the beverages anyway. And it would interact with vaccines like the Antrax given to the troops - never approved by the FDA. Acting Commissioner at the time, Michael Friedman just said to use it anyway. Read the case for aspartame disease being Lou Gehrigs on www.wnho.net (click on aspartame).

Back in 1996 when Dr. John Olney (founded the field of neuroscience called excitotoxicity, and attempted to stop the approval of aspartame with Attorney James Turner) made world news on the aspartame/brain tumor connection he was on 60 Minutes. Michael Friedman knowing full well the main reason the FDA [had] refused to allow aspartame on the market for 16 years was the brain tumors, got on 60 Minutes and defended Monsanto by saying aspartame did not cause brain tumors. Yet the FDA's own toxicologist, Dr. Adrian Gross, told Congress that without a shadow of a doubt aspartame can cause brain tumors and brain cancer, and violated the Delaney Amendment which forbid putting anything in food you know will cause cancer. His last words to Congress were "And if the FDA violates its own law, who is left to protect the public?" All you have to do is read the Bressler Report (FDA audit) on www.mpwhi.com/main.htm where Searle was caught excising brain tumors from the rats and putting them back in the study. When the rats died they resurrected them on paper. I spoke with Jerome Bressler as did Dr. H. J. Roberts (Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic, www.sunsentpress.com or 1 800 827 7991) and neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, M.D. (author of Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills, www.russellblaylockmd.com ). He told us the studies were so bad that the FDA removed the 20% of his report that was the most damning. He also said to try and attain a cover letter as well as two mice studies. Dr. Roberts wrote his congressman to get this, but the FDA refused.

I asked Michael Friedman when he was going to get his reward for selling out to Monsanto, but he never answered. In June 1999 he got his reward when Monsanto hired him. I told him at the time the FDA no longer needed a revolving door, they could build a bridge to take care of the traffic.

Today we are faced with what may be one of the largest plagues in world history, Aspartame Disease. Congress has given the NIH $2.7 billion to find out what toxin is poisoning our kids that has baffled the experts. See my report on www.wnho.net to NIH. In 20 years the kids would be dead. They ought to give the money to the parents of children damaged by aspartame.

Aspartame lawsuits have now been filed accusing some of the largest companies in the world of knowingly poisoning the public. See press release below. Understand that aspartame damages DNA so we're talking about survival of the human race. Nothing is safe as long as [aspartame] is on the market because of interaction of a deadly chemical poison. Thank you Donald Rumsfeld! The medical text, Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic, by Dr. H. J. Roberts is 1038 pages of symptoms and diseases triggered by this neurotoxin. It has even caused the epidemic of obesity because it makes you crave carbohydrates so you gain weight, and the formaldehyde accumulates in the adipose tissue (fat cells) according to the Trocho Study. That's why they are trying to get the cheeseburger law through the Senate now. Aspartame manufacturers do not want to be held responsible for the epidemic they caused by refining lies until they resembled truth, telling the public aspartame is a diet product. Aspartame is also responsible for the epidemic of diabetes. It not only can precipitate diabetes but simulates and aggravates diabetic retinopathy and neuropathy, can cause diabetics to go into convulsions and interacts with insulin.

Aspartame liberates free methyl alcohol. Charles Fleming was a body builder and played basketball four times a week, and was addicted to aspartame, drinking diet drinks all day, and consuming other products. When he died and [they] saw the methanol poisoning they thought his wife poisoned him. This Sunday school teacher is now serving 50 years in a Troy Virginia prison for a crime committed by the manufacturers of aspartame. Four doctors have written affidavits that Fleming died of aspartame but the medical examiner, Dr. Marcello Fierro (friend of Orrin Hatch) has refused to talk to Dr. Roberts even when a meeting was set up for that reason. He wrote one of the affidavits. He treated victims of aspartame disease in the trenches of medical practice for 20 years and testified before Congress. In his first press conference he said if something wasn't done then we would be faced with a global epidemic, and that's where we are.

America is terrorized by the exploding crisis in health care. American families are but a single sickness away from financial destruction. Citizens who scrimped their life through to cushion retirement must now choose whether to eat or buy drugs. Face it: if you're over 50 you're over-medicated in the USA today. Try saving half by buying from Canada and FDA will make a law against you! Land of the Free no more!

It's about money. Money for commissioner Hayes. Money for the federal prosecutors. Money for the parade of FDA officials who slithered into the NutraDeath club. Billions of quarters tinkling into vending machines of the National Soft Drink Association that once announced aspartame instability, but when cash registers began dancing to the beat of aspartame addiction just hurried to the bank.

Under the venal authority of Commissioner Hayes FDA repudiated its mission to protect a nation's health and became the private harlot of the drug industry. Aspartame and a thousand more dread poisons pimped by FDA are loosed upon a trusting population. Like seeping sewage the stinking greed of FDA and it's whoremasters has infected American healthcare, murdering children, impoverishing families and devouring widows' houses.

And it all started with Donald Rumsfeld calling in his markers and getting this deadly, deadly neurotoxic drug approved. He knew it was poison and didn't care.

The profiteer's endless proclamation:
"All is well!" "All is well!"
They lure our land and health to hell.

See lawsuit press release here.

Dr. Betty Martini, Founder, Mission Possible International, 9270 River Club Parkway, Duluth, Georgia 30097 770 242-2599 www.wnho.net (click on aspartame) and www.mpwhi.com/main.htm


Related articles:


Rumsfeld Nutrasweet Folleys Now Hurt US Troops

Aspartame, Anti-Depressants And Bush
By Jerry Mazza - Online Journal

Aspartame Neurotoxic: Coca Cola, Pepsi, Nutra Sweet Sued in California

Aspartame Detoxification Program Proposed

FDA bans Ephedra: deaths may be Aspartame related

Aspartame, not Ephedra causing cardiac arrests

FDA - Monsanto: dangerous relations

Dropping like flies: poisoned by ASPARTAME

August 2005 Idaho Observer:
Rumsfelds disease: A politically-induced biochemical disaster of global proportions
Betty Martini's comment: Before reading this article everyone should hear James Turner, Atty, explain how Don Rumsfeld called in his markers to get aspartame, a deadly chemical poison approved when the FDA said no: www.soundandfury.tv/ The entire film can be gotten at www.docworkers.com


The Aspartame/NutraSweet Fiasco
by
James S. Turner

Many health-conscious people believe that avoiding aspartame, found in over 5000 products under brand names such as Equal and NutraSweet, can improve their quality of life. The history of this synthetic sweetener's approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), including a long record of consumer complaints and the agency's demonstrated insensitivity to public concern, suggests they're right.

In October 1980 the Public Board of Inquiry (PBOI) impaneled by the FDA to evaluate aspartame safety found that the chemical caused an unacceptable level of brain tumors in animal testing. Based on this fact, the PBOI ruled that aspartame should not be added to the food supply.

This ruling capped 15 years of regulatory ineptitude, chicanery and deception by the FDA and the Searle drug company, aspartame's discoverer and manufacturer (acquired by Monsanto in 1985), and kicked off another two decades of maneuvering, manipulating and dissembling by FDA, Searle and Monsanto.

In 1965, a Searle scientist licked some of a new ulcer drug from his fingers and discovered the sweet taste of aspartame. Eureka! Selling this chemical as a food additive to hundreds of millions of healthy people every day would mean many more dollars than limited sales to the much smaller group of ulcer sufferers.

Searle, a drug company with little experience in food regulation, began studies to comply with the law -- but which failed to do so. Its early tests of the substance showed it produced microscopic holes and tumors in the brains of experimental mice, epileptic seizures in monkeys, and was converted by animals into dangerous substances, including formaldehyde.

In 1974, however, in spite of the information in its files, the FDA approved aspartame as a dry-foods additive. But the agency also made public for the first time the data supporting a food-additive decision. This data was subsequently reviewed by renowned brain researcher John Olney from Washington University in St. Louis, and other scientists.

Dr. Olney discovered two studies showing brain tumors in rats and petitioned FDA for a public hearing. Consumer Action for Improved Foods and Drugs (represented by the author of this piece) also petitioned for a public hearing based on the approval process having been based on sloppy science and the product's having reportedly caused epileptic seizures in monkeys and possible eye damage.

Dr. Olney had already shown that aspartic acid (one aspartame component) caused microscopic holes in the brains of rats after each feeding. Aspartame also includes phenylalinine, which causes PKU in a small number of susceptible children, and methyl, or wood, alcohol which is neurotoxic in large amounts.

Faced with this array of possible health dangers, FDA granted the hearing requests. In lieu of withdrawing its aspartame approval, the agency prevailed on Searle to refrain from marketing the sweetener until after completion of the hearing process. it then proposed that a Public Board of Inquiry (PBOI) review the matter.

In July of 1975, as the FDA prepared for the PBOI, an FDA inspector conducted a routine review of the Searle's Skokie Ill., testing facilities and found many deviations from proper procedures. This report led the FDA commissioner to empanel a Special Commissioner's Task Force to review Searle's labs.

In December of 1975 the Task force reported serious problem with Searle research on a wide range of products, including aspartame. It found 11pivotal studies conducted in a manner so flawed as to raise doubts about aspartame safety and create the possibility of serious criminal liability for Searle.

The FDA then stayed aspartame's approval. It also contracted, over serious internal objection, with a group of university pathologists (paid by Searle) to review most of the studies, set up a task force to review three studies and asked the U.S. Attorney for Chicago to seek a grand jury review of the monkey seizure study.

The pathologists paid by Searle only reviewed failure to properly report data and not the study's design or conduct. They found no serious problems. The FDA task force found Searle's key tumor safety study unreliable, but was ignored. The U.S. attorney let the statue of limitations run out, then (along with two aides) proceeded to join Searle's law firm.

While these committees met, the FDA organized the PBOI. Searle, the petitioners and the FDA Bureau of Foods each nominated three members for the board and the FDA commissioner selected one member from each list. the board, which convened in January of 1980, rejected petitioners' request to include the commissioner's task force information in its deliberations. Still, in October 1980, based on its limited review, the board blocked aspartame marketing until the tumor studies could be explained. Unless the commissioner overruled the board, the matter was closed.

In November 1980, however, the country elected Ronald Reagan President. Donald Rumsfeld (former congressman from Skokie, former White House chief of staff, former secretary of defense and since January 1977 president of Searle) joined the Reagan transition team. A full court press against the board decision began.

In January 1981 Rumsfeld told a sales meeting, according to one attendee, that he would call in his chips and get aspartame approved by the end of the year. On January 25th, the day the new president took office, the previous FDA commissioner's authority was suspended, and the next month, the commissioner's job went to Dr. Arthur Hull Hayes.

Transition records do not show why the administration chose ***Hayes, a professor and Defense Department contract researcher.*** In July Hayes, defying FDA advisors, approved aspartame for dry foods -- his first major decision. In November 1983 the FDA approved aspartame for soft drinks -- Hayes' last decision.

In November 1983 Hayes, under fire for accepting corporate gifts, left the agency and went to Searle's public-relations firm as senior medical advisor. Later Searle lawyer Robert Shapiro named aspartame NutraSweet. Monsanto purchased Searle. Rumsfeld received a $12 million bonus. Shapiro is now Monsanto president.

Shortly after the FDA soft-drink approval, Searle began test marketing, and complaints began to arrive at the FDA -- of such reactions as dizziness, blurred vision, headaches, and seizures. The complaints were more serious than the agency had ever received on any food additive, At the same time, scientists began looking more closely at this manufactured chemical sweeetner.

In 1985, the FDA asked the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to review the first 650 complaints (there are now over 10,000). CDC found that the symptoms in approximately 25% of the complainants had stopped and then restarted, corresponding with their having stopped and then restarted, either purposely or by accident, aspartame consumption.

The CDC also identified several specific subjects whose symptoms stopped and started as they stopped and started consuming aspartame. The FDA discounted the report. The day the FDA released the CDC report, Pepsi Cola -- having obained an advance copy -- announced its switch to aspartame with a worldwide media blitz.

Former White House Chief of Staff Rumsfeld owed a debt of gratitude to former White House confidante and Rumsfeld friend Donald Kendal, Pepsi's chairman. The Pepsi announcement and aggressive marketing (millions of gumballs, a red and white swirl, tough contracts) made NutraSweet known in every home.

At the same time, according to data released in 1995, human brain tumors like those in the animal studies rose 10% and previously benign tumors turned virulent. Searle and FDA's deputy commissioner said the data posed no problem. Two years later this same FDA official became vice president of clinical research for Searle.

From 1985 to 1995, researchers did about 400 aspartame studies. They were divided almost evenly between those that gave assurances and those that raised questions about the sweetener. Most instructively, Searle paid for 100% of those finding no problem. All studies paid for by non-industry sources raised questions.

Given this record, it is little wonder that many health-conscious people believe avoiding NutraSweet improves their quality of life. If and when a scientific consensus concludes that aspartame puts some, if not all, of its consumers at risk, it will be much too late. The point is to eat safely now. Remember: the brain you save may be your own.


James S. Turner, Esq., is a partner in the 27-year-old Washington, D.C. consumer-interest law firm of Swankin and Turner. He is the author of The Chemical Feast: The Nader Report on the Food and Drug Administration, Making Your Own Baby Food, and a number of law journal and popular media articles.


See also:

Aspartame Warning (Video on YouTube)

The infestation in Washington
An example of influence peddling is "Donald Rumsfeld, who was a former member of the U.S. Congress and the Chief of Staff in the Gerald Ford Administration, was hired as G.D. Searle's President. Attorney James Turner, Esq. alleged that G.D. Searle hired Rumsfeld to handle the aspartame approval difficulties as a 'legal problem rather than a scientific problem.' (U.S. Senate 1987)"

 


posted by Sepp Hasslberger on Friday May 7 2004
updated on Saturday December 25 2010

URL of this article:
http://www.communicationagents.com/sepp/2004/05/07/aspartame_gate_when_donald_rumsfeld_was_ceo_of_searle.htm

 


Related Articles

Aspartame and Multiple Sclerosis - Neurosurgeon's Warning
Aspartame is a low calorie sweetener. Called a potent neurotoxin by several researchers, it is being sold as a sugar substitute for those on low calorie diets and for diabetics. If you like Coke or Pepsi "light", you certainly are at risk, but both industry and health officials deny that there is any truth to this story. Manufacturers have recently been sued in California. Trade names for Aspartame are NutraSweet,... [read more]
June 10, 2004 - Sepp Hasslberger

Dropping like flies: poisoned by ASPARTAME
Sudden Cardiac Death or SCD, according to the US Centers for Disease Control, is the number one killer, having ended the lives of close to half a million Americans in 1999. Sudden Cardiac Death is not a "heart attack" or myocardial infarction, caused by clogged arteries. It's an electrical problem in which the cardiac conduction system that generates the impulses regulating the heart suddenly outputs rapid or chaotic electrical impulses,... [read more]
September 26, 2003 - Sepp Hasslberger

Aspartame and Vision Degradation
Here is a very interesting comment pertaining to Aspartame and vision which is discussed in Joseph G. Hattersley's brilliant article: "Avoiding Visual Degeneration". Dr. Dr Klaus-J. S e e l i g makes some astute observations on how the medical Mafia and the food giants continue to hide and prevent further research on their products in the name of profits or as he quotes the "Big Golden Harvest". In addition... [read more]
March 16, 2004 - Chris Gupta

Aspartame Detoxification Program Proposed
Aspartame is a highly toxic sweetener which unfortunately, through political pressures overriding the warnings of the FDA's own scientists, has obtained approval from the FDA and consequently from health authorities world wide. It is being sold as a low calorie way to get that sweet taste, and is being recommended for diabetics and anyone who would like to avoid sugar. Thousands of products, including sports drinks and the ubiquitous "light"... [read more]
January 31, 2004 - Sepp Hasslberger

Aspartame Neurotoxic: Coca Cola, Pepsi, Nutra Sweet Sued in California
The artificial sweetener aspartame, originally made and forced on the market by Monsanto Corp., is a neurotoxin and is damaging people's health, allege three separate lawsuits filed in different counties in California. Defendants in the lawsuits include Coca-cola, PepsiCo, Bayer Corp., the Dannon Company, William Wrigley Jr. Company, ConAgra Foods, Wyeth, Inc., The NutraSweet Company, and Altria Corp. (parent company of Kraft Foods and Philip Morris) and WalMart. An unexplained... [read more]
April 09, 2004 - Sepp Hasslberger

Aspartame: RICO Complaint Filed Against NutraSweet, ADA, Monsanto
15 September 2004 - A Racketeering (RICO) complaint against NutraSweet, the American Diabetes Association and Monsanto was filed in the US District Court for Northern California. The defendants are charged with manufacturing and marketing a deadly neurotoxin unfit for human consumption, while they assured the pubic that aspartame (also known as NutraSweet/Equal) contaminated products are safe and healthful, even for children and pregnant women. Aspartame, the neurotoxic artificial sweetener that... [read more]
September 17, 2004 - Sepp Hasslberger

 

 

 


Readers' Comments


Be careful with Betty's letter - it is very one-sided. There's more to aspartame than the hype - it may not be all that good for you, but accepting the hype as truth is not the answer. The FDA bent over backwards to let those opposed to aspartame have a say.

Posted by: Tim on May 14, 2004 03:06 AM

 


I agree that Betty is very much on the negative side for Aspartame. However she does not seem to be alone. There are at least ten medical figures who have either written books or articles about aspartame dangers, and it does not seem to be a matter of a "lone crazy voice" or some such. Too many voices to discard...

Posted by: Sepp on May 14, 2004 05:47 PM

 


A further comment from Tim by e-mail:

While medical figures have written books or articles, what is missing are any solid published studies. A lot of it, despite the many years, is based on theories and conjectures rather than statistics. You can do a search on pubmed to see - the closest thing I found was a possible link between an eye rash and aspartame in terms of published studies.

I think there is something, but as long as people are making it an emotional issue, no science is really going to come out. My theory is that the issue is not methanol or formaldehyde in the blood stream, but that these compounds are catalyzed in places like the liver and the eye where the enzymes that do the conversion hang out. The issue is not drinking aspartame one time, or even a huge quantity one day, it is day after day, year after year, and these things staying in the body, in certain organs. Aspartame has probably been around long enough that a simple biopsy of deceased people who have had large quantities would answer the question (as long as their bodies are not pre-preserved in formaldehyde).

If people are really serious, rather than spending so much money and energy on lawsuits and town-crier type activities, they could raise funds for solid scientific studies (unbiased). The government has spent so much money on this that that is probably not the place to go. Reader's Digest has an interesting article about how three sisters raised $20 M for ALS research over a few years and really revolutionized was what going on. I suspect it'll take something like that for aspartame to get this thing done.


...and my reply:

It seems that studies critical of aspartame are having slim to zero chances of getting through the publishing process, and with big industry advertising in medical journals, that should not even be too much of a surprise.

I prefer to think that the opponents of aspartame are not just doing it for a joke.

You noticed correctly, by the way, that it was THE Donald Rumsfeld who called in his poilitical markers to get aspartame approved. If you read some of the critical material, even though it does not come from respected journals, you do get an idea that something is very wrong.

There is a recent article that exemplifies the kind of control pharmaceutical companies have over the publishing process.

Doctors without borders: Why you can't trust medical journals any more

Sepp


Posted by: Sepp on May 14, 2004 11:07 PM

 


Tim's latest comment (15-5-2004):

Methanol eventually turns into formaldehyde in the body, to which a
small number of people have an allergic reaction too. This happens in
a number of organs in the body, including the liver and the eyes.

Forget about the journals, I haven't even seen any good experiments,
statistical analysis online. That's what is missing.

Posted by: Sepp on May 15, 2004 04:32 PM

 


It just seems there is a consistent pattern of wholesaling dangerous additives to the public, from companies that have a direct interest in keeping people sick and taking their drugs. I think we need to do a lot better job at educating people about nutrition, and helping them to avoid these additives, steering them instead onto whole and unprocessed foods. Labels should disclose the actual ingredients without allowing any fudging. It's a really sad situation when people are buying all this low-carb kind of hype, when the replacement products are often just as bad (or worse) than the originals. We have a local celebrity who has made a career of hawking these specious products like Splenda, supposedly to make people lose weight. But as I recently read about a study with rats, these metabolic-fooling products actually make them eat more. And the celebrity I mentioned also developed breast cancer! It seems we are constantly bombarded by products that are absolutely no good for us. Shun the hype, do your homework and find the joy of true enlightenment and health!

Posted by: Ardillero on July 15, 2004 12:19 AM

 


The FDA approved aspartame because of Rumsfeld and with Iraq and DU it is time for him to leave.


Posted by: Mark Schindler on December 23, 2004 02:34 AM

 


Get this. My wife inadvertently gave our (then) 2 year old toddler some yogurt containing aspertame. It was his first and only exposure. Within two hours he fell to the ground, vomited and was taken to the hospital with a
head tilt (could not hold up his head). I repeatedly tried to file a report by phone with the FDA but was told that aspertame could not have caused this (told by the field agents) and thus it would not be appropriate for them to report it! (Since they "knew" it could not cause these problems.) I finally gave up. This means the FDA can never get the data in their system. Then I asked the yogurt company for their data showing adverse reactions - they refused to give me any, of course. But I noticed a year later they dropped the amount of aspertame in their product. So they must have also seen adverse reactions. Thanks, Rummy - you're a real genius - you really need to be out there patrolling Baghdad in the vehicle you forgot to armor.

Posted by: William E. on December 29, 2004 06:17 AM

 


A message with relevance to Aspartame, but even more, received by email... through the Alternative Medicine Forum - Yahoo Group:

From: "James D. Bowen, MD"
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005


Stephen,

I was just utterly shocked to have recently discovered another FDA first degree murder! When I studied chemistry forty plus years ago, they were using a fairly benign bleaching agent to bleach white flour. Now it comes out they have started using alloxan!

Alloxan is a poison, the most famous spinner up of super oxide free radicals known to science! It is used to chemically produce diabetes in normal rats, because alloxan spins up enormous amounts of free radicals in pancreatic beta cells, utterly destroying them!

Aspartame also so damages the mitochondria, that people are then damaged by the free radicals spun up by the damaged mitochondria! (Premature graying for example)The VERY LAST thing we need added to our diet is alloxan, (A well known grievous poison!) which the FDA now has being force fed to us in white flour! (This includes even pasta!) Boy! Is the FDA ever making it hard to get any wholesome food in this country!

Alloxan thus directly interacts with Aspartame to produce multi organ damage, including diabetes and syndrome X! It also makes the poisonings from many other junk-foods far worse, and causes advanced aging (just like Aspartame!) AND, many other DEGENERATIVE DISEASES!

I hope this information helps to prove to the New Mexico Legislature, and to the courts that the FDA is now indeed just farcical, since Rumsfeld in 1981 broke everything decent in our government to put the heinous Aspartame into Us!

Sure glad I eat mostly whole wheat bread! I will now avoid ALL white flour products from this point forward. Somebody, obviously just wants to kill us!

Please pass this on to the Minnesota Attorney General for me.

Sincerely,

James D. Bowen MD

Posted by: Sepp on June 21, 2005 07:35 PM

 


You must excuse me using a pseudonym to respond, but the chemical industry is a relatively closed system, and I can't afford to be "outed" as it were. I just finished writing a brief essay for some family members about the alloxan scare making the rounds of the internet, so in regards to Dr. Bowen's comments, I thought I would share the info with you and your readers.

Let me start by saying that I've been fighting against aspartame in the food supply for 20 years now, and I have no quibble with the proposition that it is dangerous and possible behind the rise in obesity, Alzheimer's and autism that we've seen.

But in regards to the alloxan that Dr. Brown mentions, I think it's important to note that most medical doctors...if he is actually one and not just playing one on the internet, are not chemists.

Because of my job, I have pretty good sources in the chemical field, and have access to a slew of folks with PhDs in chemistry.

There is a syndrome called alloxan diabetes, an animal model for diabetes mellitus; administration of alloxan produces selective destruction of the beta cells of the pancreas, causing hyperglycemia and ketoacidosis. (beta cell, 1. one of the cells that compose the bulk of the islets of Langerhans and secrete insulin.)

alloxan (al·lox·an)(when produced by chemical companies) is an oxidized product of uric acid. Called also uroxin. Most often created as a byproduct of preservative manufacturing for skin products, most of which contain urea...check your cosmetics ingredients for Diazohdinyl Urea and Imidiazolidinyl Urea if you don't believe me.

So, while I can verify that alloxan is bad juju, what I can't verify is that flour mills are using alloxan in their manufacturing process. What I can guarantee you is that alloxan is NOT manufactured in the quantities that would be required for all of the white flour used in this country.

It's also interesting to note that the bleaching process (chloride based) that would convert xanthine (from wheat germ oil) into alloxan was banned by the Supreme Court back in 1918.

When freshly milled, flour is slightly yellow. To whiten it, manufacturers either let the flour age naturally or speed up the process by adding chemicals (such as benzoyl peroxide or acetone peroxide) that bleach it. This process gives the flour more gluten-producing potential, but naturally aged flours develop more gluten as well. Also, enzyme-active soy flour is a valuable "natural" flour bleaching agent, especially where the use of chemical bleaching agents has been prohibited (all of the EU, except the UK, most of the PacRim). The UK and the US seem to be the last holdouts of chemical processing...and considering the sheer volume of money the chemical companies pump into the political process, that isn't terribly surprising. (Witness Dow Chemical and Dupont's ability to keep the War on Drugs going since the 40's.)

All of that said, white refined flour is of course not as good for you as whole wheat, wheat germ, and lightly milled wheat. That goes without saying.

But that said, I believe that the people panicking about alloxan have overstated their case, and fail to understand the actual processing process. (Which again...not an endorsement of white flour.)


Posted by: Winifred on July 5, 2005 08:10 PM

 


It is a fact that FDA instituted GLP (good laboratory practice) to prevent future data fraud in 1978. GD Searle's resurrecting mice, which died again and again was the reason for the series of GXP (M-manufacturing, C-clinical) legislation. Hype or not, Betty's article pointed out Rumsfeld's lasting contribution to this country. He should be remembered for Aspartame, search for WMD and Abu Grahib.

Posted by: Kam on July 31, 2005 06:39 PM

 


New Mexico drug intervention
New Mexico drug intervention is mainly here to give an individual the right resources to get an dependent person that doesn't think he requires it into a drug or alcohol rehabilitation treatment.
It can be complicated for a person to decide when it is the decent time to begin an alcohol or drug intervention. It becomes effortless when the individuals have the tools to be skillful enough to discover the signs. For example, familiarly, when individuals start the never ending cycle of drugs or alcohol, their behavior begins to transform, they sometimes spend substantial amounts of their income to buy drugs or alcohol, they don't communicate as well or as much with the people around them, etc.
In recent times, people have comprehended that when coercion is involved, there is no successful recovery. That is why an intervention doesn't condone exercising coercion to get somebody to enter a rehabilitation program. An intervention is essentially individuals allying to face a dependent person's addiction and making him or her confront the reality that he or she needs a specialist’s care.
New Mexico alcohol intervention
Alcoholism always fabricates this illusion that everything is decent in the life of the one affected by it. But the fact that they don’t examine it does not mean the situation is not significantly inadequate. The people that are friends with the alcoholic should have a plan. They have created intervention to make it effortless for the individuals that are friendly to the alcohol dependent person. It is significantly good to have a lot of people practicing the intervention. It’s a necessity that the addict not know before about the intervention. The intervention continually makes the alcoholic look at what his addiction does to him and everyone around. The whole point of doing an intervention is to have the person struggling with an alcohol dependency enter a rehabilitation program. That is why it’s more evident if the people have searched for rehab treatments that would be appropriate the person. Because an addicted person can be very unstable, you should be ready to send the person struggling with an alcohol dependency right away when he feels that he needs help. An intervention is a utterly helpful tool for the people that suffer from being in an addict’s environment.

Often, even when an alcohol intervention is done, the person does not want to attend a rehabilitation program. Continually, some time will pass before the individual can identify the extent of his addiction. But even so, don’t think that an intervention has not been useful; time is required for the addict to realize things. Each individual will take their own time to perceive that they need a rehab. When the addict calls the persons for treatment, you will all know that the intervention worked.


Posted by: larrybailey on April 10, 2009 07:04 AM

 















Security code:




Please enter the security code displayed on the above grid


Due to our anti-spamming policy the comments you are posting will show up online within few hours from the posting time.



 

   

The Individual Is Supreme And Finds Its Way Through Intuition

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

These articles are brought to you strictly for educational and informational purposes. Be sure to consult your health practitioner of choice before utilizing any of the information to cure or mitigate disease. Any copyrighted material cited is used strictly in a non commercial way and in accordance with the "fair use" doctrine.

 

1117



Enter your Email


Powered by FeedBlitz

 

 

Most Popular Articles
Lipitor: Side Effects And Natural Remedy

Lipitor - The Human Cost

Fluoride Accumulates in Pineal Gland

Original blueprints for 200 mpg carburetor found in England

Medical system is leading cause of death and injury in US

Aspartame and Multiple Sclerosis - Neurosurgeon's Warning

'Bird Flu', SARS - Biowarfare or a Pandemic of Propaganda?

 

 

More recent articles
European Food Safety Authority cherry picks evidence - finds Aspartame completely safe

Did Aspartame kill Cory Terry?

Retroviral particles in human immune defenses - is AIDS orthodoxy dead wrong?

Vaccine damage in Great Britain: The consequences of Dr Wakefield’s trials

European Union seeks consumer input on organic agriculture

A Seed for Change - Greek film maker says we can 'grow our way out of the crisis'


Archive of all articles on this site

 

 

Most recent comments
Lipitor - The Human Cost

Uganda: Pfizer Sponsored AIDS Institute Snubs Natural Treatment Options

Aspartame and Multiple Sclerosis - Neurosurgeon's Warning

Beyond Einstein's Relativity: Cosmology Dissident Says Big Bang Absurd

Beyond Einstein's Relativity: Cosmology Dissident Says Big Bang Absurd

 

 

Candida International

What Does MHRA Stand For??

Bono and Bush Party without Koch: AIDS Industry Makes a Mockery of Medical Science

Profit as Usual and to Hell with the Risks: Media Urge that Young Girls Receive Mandatory Cervical Cancer Vaccine

 

Share The Wealth

Drinking Water Fluoridation is Genotoxic & Teratogenic

Democracy At Work? - PPM On Fluoride

"Evidence Be Damned...Patient Outcome Is Irrelevant" - From Helke

Why Remove Fluoride From Phosphate Rock To Make Fertilizer

FOFI Codex Meeting Report On Labelling May 9 - 13, 2011

 

Evolving Collective Intelligence

Let Us Please Frame Collective Intelligence As Big As It Is

Reflections on the evolution of choice and collective intelligence

Whole System Learning and Evolution -- and the New Journalism

Gathering storms of unwanted change

Protect Sources or Not? - More Complex than It Seems

 

Consensus

Islanda, quando il popolo sconfigge l'economia globale.

Il Giorno Fuori dal Tempo, Il significato energetico del 25 luglio

Rinaldo Lampis: L’uso Cosciente delle Energie

Attivazione nei Colli Euganei (PD) della Piramide di Luce

Contatti con gli Abitanti Invisibili della Natura

 

Diary of a Knowledge Broker

Giving It Away, Making Money

Greenhouses That Change the World

Cycles of Communication and Collaboration

What Is an "Integrated Solution"?

Thoughts about Value-Add

 

 

 

Best sellers from