Health Supreme by Sepp Hasslberger

Networking For A Better Future - News and perspectives you may not find in the media

Networking For A Better Future - News and perspectives you may not find in the media

Health Supreme

News Blog

Site Map





Food for Thought


Human Potential






The Media

War Crimes


Articles Archive


See also:


Communication Agents:

INACTIVE  Ivan Ingrilli
  Chris Gupta
  Tom Atlee
INACTIVE  Emma Holister
  Rinaldo Lampis
  Steve Bosserman
  CA Journal


Robin Good's
Web sites:












The Individual - Human Ability:


Society - Politics:






October 20, 2008

Strattera adverse effects: UK Medicines Agency refuses to act

Janne Larsson, an investigator and reporter in Sweden, has obtained information about adverse event reports on Eli Lilly's ADHD drug Strattera, using the Swedish freedom of information laws. The data, coming from both the FDA's adverse reaction database and from reports to the UK's Medicines agency, shows numerous adverse effects and scores of deaths by suicide.

Yet the agency, even after repeated prodding by Larsson to initiate action, has refused to budge or even acknowledge that there is a problem. MHRA apparently accepts the drug's producer Eli Lilly's data rather than its own and the FDA's adverse event reports.


Image credit: Monheit Law - Contact a Lawyer familiar with Strattera lawsuits

Larsson says: An investigation of MHRA’s handling of the harmful effects of the ADHD drug Strattera has proven the following:

MHRA has ignored data about instances of death among children in connection with Strattera treatment. At least 41 children have died. The agency has not investigated the reported cases and does not even have a compiled summary of cases with fatal outcome. Further the agency has allowed the manufacturer Eli Lilly to give false information about the number of fatal cases and has taken no action against the company once the false information was revealed.

MHRA has for almost three years been in possession of data proving that Strattera can cause agitation, mania and psychotic reactions with hallucinations among children. Yet no warning has been issued to doctors and parents. The agency has withheld these disastrous consequences despite clear evidence. Due to bureaucratic procedures no warnings have been issued even if Eli Lilly reluctanly conceded to include these harmful reactions in its information to the public almost a year ago.

MHRA has for almost three years been in possession of data showing that Strattera in many cases actually can cause or worsen the “condition” it is claimed to alleviate. More than 700 reports were submitted to the manufacturer, Eli Lilly, about Strattera inducing “psychomotor hyperactivity”. Lilly called this an exacerbation of the “underlying ADHD”. If we would apply this to the area of real medicine and to diabetes we could say that the patient got a diabetes medication with resulting heavy increase in blood sugar level. Such a medication would probably be withdrawn very fast from the market. But the MHRA has not yet, after three years, succeeded to get even a bad quality review of these cases done – not even from the manufacturer.

The background data for these conclusions can be found in the following text and in the linked documents. When reading the data below please remember the promise from the MHRA: “…we take any necessary action to protect the public promptly if there is a problem.” MHRA, About us [1]

Note that the linked documents (within letters described below) in most cases could not be obtained in UK where the issuance of them would be deemed as prejudicing “the ability of the Assessory body to offer impartial advice” and where the MHRA wants “to allow marketing authorisation holders the chance to respond to regulatory action and make commercial decisions before data are in the public domain.” (MHRA, e-mail about FOIA-request, 29th September, 2006). However the documents could be obtained in Sweden, even if the MHRA has tried to stop the issuance of them by implying that publication could threaten the relations between Sweden and UK.

Deaths among children in connection with Strattera treatment

In May I submitted detailed data about cases of Strattera death to the MHRA. 1st October I finally got an answer from the Scientific Assessor of the Vigilance and Risk Management of Medicines (VRMM). 7th October I got an answer from Professor Kent Woods, CEO of the MHRA, referring to the letter sent by the Scientific Assessor.

My data about Strattera deaths can be found in the letter Strattera: Eli Lilly gave false information about deaths from Strattera treatment – a request for full investigation from 15th May. [2]

The answer from the Scientific Assessor shows that MHRA is continuing to ignore data about instances of death among children and adults in connection with Strattera treatment. Despite limited resources and having to rely on data released by reluctant medical agencies I had been able to produce a summary of reported cases of Strattera death. That’s much more than the MHRA, with its immense resources, had been able to do.

The agency was provided with specific data about instances of death forming an excellent starting point for a full investigation. But instead of using the data the MHRA used its energy to explain why it is impossible to investigate these cases further, and in doing so presents some remarkable comments.

The Scientific Assessor states in the letter 1st October [3]:

“… in order to calculate the total number of reports with a fatal outcome it is not simply a case of adding up reports with a fatal outcome mentioned in our assessment reports of the PSURs [Periodic Safety Update Reports] and those available on the FDA website as these different sources may contain duplicate information.” [Emphasis added.]

I fully agree and it takes only a casual reading of my letter from 15th May to find out that much care has been taken to exclude possible duplicates. It is quite easy to see that the data presented about fatal cases in my letter is NOT “simply a case of adding up reports with a fatal outcome”. The only way to come to another conclusion would be not to look in the first place and it is a condemnation of the effectiveness of the agency to state the following in the letter:

“We have looked at the data you have sent us to see if they can add insight to the statutory sources of data we have received and do not think that they are of benefit as we cannot verify their source or accuracy. (p. 3) [Emphasis added.]

I must add to all the data provided in my letter 15th May that the “source” of the information about fatal cases is FDA’s Medwatch system and the PSURs (submitted directly to the MHRA). I must make it clear that is very easy for a lay person to find out that almost all reports about fatal outcome from Strattera treatment submitted to the FDA came from Eli Lilly!

Thus the “source” of the information about fatal cases was in most of the cases the manufacturer itself – Eli Lilly. And yet the MHRA has not been able to verify the “source or accuracy” of the information. The MHRA Scientific Assessor states in the letter: “The sources of data that regulators use such as company data, spontaneous adverse reaction reports and literature are set out in European and national law.” That’s very good and now we know that the data I submitted to the MHRA about all fatal cases from Strattera treatment – in the absolute majority of cases – were known by and reported via the manufacturer Eli Lilly.

My FOIA request earlier this year to get a compilation of fatal cases in connection with Strattera treatment was answered 12th August:

“The MHRA holds no data other than that previously released to you [the misleading data from Eli Lilly in November 2007, see my letter from 15th May for more data] which was the data provided by the company. If you have any questions about FDA data or the data provided by the company, you should contact those organisations.”

In other words the MHRA didn’t have a compiled summary of cases with fatal outcome in August – and the agency has not to this point been able to compile such a summary.

As the agency has not been capable of getting the data – or not even been capable of using the specific data submitted for its use in a full investigation – NO action is taken despite the many verified deaths among children in connection with Strattera treatment. This disregard for the safety of children is a scandal which should lead to a full formal investigation by the Department of Health.

Drug induced agitation, mania and psychosis with hallucinations

I’ve been contacted by parents asking if Strattera can induce mania and psychosis with hallucinations. Their children have had such symptoms. The parents have not found any warnings about it and their children’s doctors don’t think that the symptoms are caused by the drug. The parents were desperate.

However the MHRA has known for almost three years that Strattera can cause agitation, mania and psychotic reactions with hallucinations among children, but has refused to issue warnings about it.

The Scientific Assessor from the MHRA in the letter of 1st October [3] now confirms my earlier arguments that the agency had knowledge about these effects a long time ago:

“… following an initial request in the assessment report for the Periodic Safety Update for the period (dates 27-05-2005 to 26-11-2005) we asked Eli Lilly for more information to enable us to review this issue in more detail.” (p. 2)

This means that in the period ending 26th November, 2005 – at the time when Strattera was approved only in UK and four other European countries, but not in the 22 additional European countries where it is now approved – Eli Lilly and the MHRA had knowledge about these disastrous effects in children taking Strattera. But neither the MHRA nor Eli Lilly told anything about it and Strattera was approved in 20 additional European countries in April 2006.


Image credit: Wikimedia Commons

Professor Kent Woods, CEO of the MHRA seems to be very misinformed by his staff when answering about Strattera in a recent letter of 7th October, 2008. In the letter Professor Woods states [4]:

“The MHRA is committed to ensuring that all safety concerns are subject to robust scientific assessment and the best possible regulatory action is taken in a timely manner. We strive to maintain the highest standards of work and review our practices to ensure these standards are maintained or improved upon where necessary.” (p. 1)

In their 3rd March, 2006 report Psychiatric Adverse Events Associated with Drug Treatment of ADHD: Review of Postmarketing Safety Data [5], the FDA stated that there was “compelling evidence for a likely causal association between … [Strattera/amphetamine drugs] and treatment emergent onset of signs and/or symptoms of psychosis or mania, notably hallucinations, in some patients.” (p. 17) 360 reports about the drug inducing these effects had been received up to June 2005.

From this FDA report the MHRA had knowledge about the “compelling evidence” for Strattera causing these effects on or about 3rd March, 2006 – but did nothing.

In August the same year (2006) the MHRA requested the same data set from Eli Lilly that was submitted to the FDA and which formed the basis of the FDA report for Strattera. The data was sent to the MHRA some days later. But the agency then decided not to do anything with the information. Instead it was decided that Eli Lilly – the manufacturer – should do an analysis of the data and submit its conclusions to the agency.

Professor Kent Woods says in his letter: “An important aspect to this [‘robust scientific assessment’, ‘highest standards’] is ensuring that data from all available sources have been considered…”

This may be true in some other area but it is definitely not true for the safety work around Strattera. A very good example of this is the complete rejection of the “robust scientific assessment” of Strattera in the FDA report. Answering the question why the agency did not use the “compelling evidence” for harm in the FDA report an official at the MHRA declared in a letter [6]:

“Changes to European product information are based on assessment by EU regulators, agreement between member states and in line with legal requirements about product information, not on conclusions of FDA assessors. (25th May, 2007) [Emphasis added.]

Responsible officials at the MHRA had instead decided to rely completely on the analysis of the manufacturer of the drug – Eli Lilly. (In an article in the Daily Mail this summer, Andrew Herxheimer, editor of the Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin, and emeritus fellow of the Cochrane Centre commented: “Asking a drug company to review its own product is crazy, but it goes on quite a lot.”) [7]

At the end of 2007/beginning 2008 Eli Lilly submitted its review of Strattera induced agitation, mania and psychosis with hallucinations to the MHRA. It was a complete whitewash.

In summary: FDA was very clear about the psychosis-inducing effects of Strattera; the MHRA did not listen. Instead the MHRA turned to the manufacturer. Eli Lilly tried to explain away all the bad results found in its review. For the full history about MHRA’s failure in this area and for a comparison of the FDA report with the Lilly report, please see the following letter: The ADHD drug Strattera – actions needed now [8] from January 2008, and the letter The ADHD drug Strattera – an analysis of reports of drug induced mania, psychosis and hallucinations [9] from March 2008.

In the letter from March [9] Eli Lilly’s whitewash report for the period up to November 2007 is presented. At the end of that report Lilly says [10]: “Nevertheless, Lilly will consider adding language regarding psychotic symptoms including hallucinations” to its product information sheet. (p. 1279)


Larsson - Suicides & Psychiatric Drugs

And so we come to October 2008 and the letters from Professor Kent Woods and from the Scientific Assessor for Strattera. We are “reassured that the MHRA is acting … to ensure that Strattera is used … as safely as possible”, that “all safety concerns are subject to robust scientific assessment and the best possible regulatory action”, that “any new safety signals are evaluated in an independent, scientifically robust manner” (Woods); we are told that “discussions between European Member States and Eli Lilly are ongoing to agree on the most appropriate information to be included in the product information for patients and prescribers”; we are told to be patient, to understand that it takes time from the point where “updates have been agreed for inclusion in the product information” to the point where these will “appear in the packs in the market place due to movement of stock in the supply chain”, and that the appearances are estimated to be “within the next 6 months” (Scientific Assessor).

It is probably hard to find a more obvious violation of the promise “… we take any necessary action to protect the public promptly if there is a problem” than the case described above. The worried parents still have no answers if Strattera can induce the symptoms they find in their children. And the MHRA knew about it three years ago – but withheld the data. This should be included in the investigation of the agency by the Department of Health.

Strattera causing “hyperactivity” – the condition it was supposed to alleviate

In my earlier letter to the Department of Health (29th August) I took up the data about the “700 forgotten cases of hyperactivity”. I referred to my letter 2nd January to the MHRA [8] and gave data about the fact that Eli Lilly had withheld sensitive information and classified harmful effects as an “exacerbation of the underlying ADHD”.

The logical solution would have been for the MHRA to request all data about this security risk, followed by an independent review of the data. But this was not done – and as expected nothing is still done. MHRA asked Lilly for an explanation about this “signal” stemming from Periodic Safety Update Report 5 (dates 27-05-2005 to 26-11-2005) but got no answer. Three years later the Scientific Assessor from the MHRA writes in the letter from 1st October:

“The information submitted by the MAH [Market Authorization Holder] has been evaluated and the MAH will be requested to provide further detailed information within the next 2 months to ensure the issue has been investigated in a thorough and scientific manner.” (p. 2) [3]

The MHRA got this “safety signal” almost three years ago – and is still in the process of getting some sensible answers from Eli Lilly.


I again request the Department of Health to take action. This does not concern “only” the children in UK; it concerns the children in the whole of Europe, indeed it concerns all the children of the world.

The failure of the agency will also mean that psychiatrists within The Guideline Development Group in NICE can push through more “treatment” with Strattera and other ADHD drugs. The MHRA is withholding the clear evidence for harmful effects and the psychiatrists with close relations to the manufacturers of the drugs can unimpeded recommend these “medicines” to unsuspecting doctors and parents.

The answers given by Professor Kent Woods and the Scientific Assessor did not in any way handle my concerns. On the contrary, they finally proved that a full formal investigation of the matters raised above is needed.

Yours sincerely,

Janne Larsson

Reporter - investigating psychiatry
Snöbollsgränd 22
129 45 Hägersten

[1] MHRA, About us,

[2] Larsson, Strattera: Eli Lilly gave false information about deaths from Strattera treatment – a request for full investigation, May 15, 2008,

[3] MHRA, Re: letter of 9th September 2008 to “Assessor responsible for Strattera”, October 1, 2008,

[4] MHRA, Re: Open letter to Pr. Kent Woods (10th August 2008), October 7, 2008

[5] FDA, Psychiatric Adverse Events Associated with Drug Treatment of ADHD: Review of Postmarketing Safety Data, released March 3, 2006.

[6] MHRA, answer FOI request, May 25, 2007,

[7] Daily Mail, Heart attacks and suicides... yet the dangers were all kept so quiet. So how CAN you trust your medicine? July 7, 2008,

[8] Larsson, The ADHD drug Strattera – actions needed now, January 2, 2008,

[9] Larsson, The ADHD drug Strattera – an analysis of reports of drug induced mania, psychosis and hallucinations, March 9, 2008,

[10] Eli Lilly, Cumulative review of Spontaneous Case Reports of Mania, Psychotic Disorders, Hallucinations, and Agitation, Appendix 16 to Periodic Safety Report 9 for Strattera, 2008,

See also:

November 2008: MHRA and the Strattera scandal - An open letter to the UK Department of Health

Doctors told to curb use of Ritalin in hyperactive children

Children's suicide attempts raise concerns about ADHD medication

The ADHD drug Strattera: Lilly to issue warnings about psychosis, hallucinations, mania and agitation

Strattera side effects

Strattera - 10,988 adverse "psychiatric reactions" reported in less than three years

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder? No, they're just naughty, say experts

December 2008: ADHD drug causes psychosis, hallucinations, mania
The manufacturer, Eli Lilly, has now changed the label for Strattera in Europe to include warnings that Strattera CAUSES "hallucinations, delusional thinking, mania or agitation in children and adolescents without a prior history of psychotic illness or mania at usual doses".


posted by Sepp Hasslberger on Monday October 20 2008
updated on Tuesday December 2 2008

URL of this article:


Related Articles

Strattera Adverse Events: Deaths Mount - Will EU Health Authorities Intervene?
Will European Health Authorities act on reports of serious side effects and deaths connected with the ADHD drug Strattera? Are 95 deaths, 965 reports of suicidal behavior and some 60,000 reported adverse events enough to take action, asks Swedish researcher Janne Larsson in a letter to the UK's Medicines Agency. Eli Lilly's ADHD drug Strattera (atomoxetine HCl), is promoted as the first non-stimulant medication that's FDA-approved to treat ADHD in... [read more]
May 21, 2008 - Sepp Hasslberger

ADHD: Eli Lilly's Strattera - Swedish Test Disastrous
An FDA advisory panel recently recommended, that stimulant drugs such as Ritalin, prescribed for Attention Deficit (ADHD) should carry strong warnings after reports of strokes and heart problems, including 25 sudden deaths, surfaced. According to Evelyn Pringle, Attention Deficit Disorder, which amounts to little more than a list of behaviors, was voted into existence in 1980 as a mental illness by the American Psychiatric Association. It was then included in... [read more]
February 16, 2006 - Sepp Hasslberger

Antidepressants - Drugging kids in school
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or ADHD, is a custom-made "disease" to start selling drugs quite legally to school kids. Have the doctor prescribe them. Your kid will be that much better off - or not? It appears that the real dough about the adverse effects of antidepressant drugs has been kept secret so as not to ruin sales. Violence and suicide are common side effects of those drugs, and... [read more]
February 11, 2004 - Sepp Hasslberger

ADHD - Psychiatric Drugs Bring Brave New World
"Only a large-scale popular movement toward decentralization and self-help can arrest the present tendency toward statism... A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude. To make them love it is the task assigned, in present-day totalitarian states, to ministries of... [read more]
November 23, 2007 - Sepp Hasslberger

Nutrients Cure 'Mental Illness' - Orthomolecular Psychiatry
Orthomolecular medical researchers say the future of psychiatry is in nutrition because nutrition has such a long, safe and effective history of correcting many mental problems. Starting us out on a path of discovery and healing, the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service ( recommends a simple but abundant daily nutrition program that has been effective in making many of the symptoms of what is today called "mental illness" disappear without trace.... [read more]
November 07, 2005 - Sepp Hasslberger

Psychiatric Drugs - Engineering Children
New Scientist just days ago came out with an article Prescribing of hyperactivity drugs is out of control that discusses the mind boggling figures of child drugging at the hands of psychiatrists in the U.S.A. ADHD is the diagnosis that accounts for close to 4 million prescriptions of mind-altering drugs such as methylphenidate, marketed as Ritalin, to "treat" the "condition". Vera Hassner Sharav of the Alliance for Human Research Protection... [read more]
April 04, 2006 - Sepp Hasslberger




Readers' Comments

Security code:

Please enter the security code displayed on the above grid

Due to our anti-spamming policy the comments you are posting will show up online within few hours from the posting time.



The Individual Is Supreme And Finds Its Way Through Intuition


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

These articles are brought to you strictly for educational and informational purposes. Be sure to consult your health practitioner of choice before utilizing any of the information to cure or mitigate disease. Any copyrighted material cited is used strictly in a non commercial way and in accordance with the "fair use" doctrine.



Enter your Email

Powered by FeedBlitz



Most Popular Articles
Lipitor: Side Effects And Natural Remedy

Lipitor - The Human Cost

Fluoride Accumulates in Pineal Gland

Original blueprints for 200 mpg carburetor found in England

Medical system is leading cause of death and injury in US

Aspartame and Multiple Sclerosis - Neurosurgeon's Warning

'Bird Flu', SARS - Biowarfare or a Pandemic of Propaganda?



More recent articles
Chromotherapy in Cancer

Inclined Bed Therapy: Tilt your bed for healthful sleep

European Food Safety Authority cherry picks evidence - finds Aspartame completely safe

Did Aspartame kill Cory Terry?

Retroviral particles in human immune defenses - is AIDS orthodoxy dead wrong?

Vaccine damage in Great Britain: The consequences of Dr Wakefield’s trials

Archive of all articles on this site



Most recent comments
Uganda: Pfizer Sponsored AIDS Institute Snubs Natural Treatment Options

Lipitor: Side Effects And Natural Remedy

AIDS: 'No Gold Standard' For HIV Testing

Lipitor: Side Effects And Natural Remedy

'Global Business Coalition' Wants More Testing: But Tests Do Not Show AIDS



Candida International

What Does MHRA Stand For??

Bono and Bush Party without Koch: AIDS Industry Makes a Mockery of Medical Science

Profit as Usual and to Hell with the Risks: Media Urge that Young Girls Receive Mandatory Cervical Cancer Vaccine


Share The Wealth

Artificial Water Fluoridation: Off To A Poor Start / Fluoride Injures The Newborn

Drinking Water Fluoridation is Genotoxic & Teratogenic

Democracy At Work? - PPM On Fluoride

"Evidence Be Damned...Patient Outcome Is Irrelevant" - From Helke

Why Remove Fluoride From Phosphate Rock To Make Fertilizer


Evolving Collective Intelligence

Let Us Please Frame Collective Intelligence As Big As It Is

Reflections on the evolution of choice and collective intelligence

Whole System Learning and Evolution -- and the New Journalism

Gathering storms of unwanted change

Protect Sources or Not? - More Complex than It Seems



Islanda, quando il popolo sconfigge l'economia globale.

Il Giorno Fuori dal Tempo, Il significato energetico del 25 luglio

Rinaldo Lampis: L'uso Cosciente delle Energie

Attivazione nei Colli Euganei (PD) della Piramide di Luce

Contatti con gli Abitanti Invisibili della Natura


Diary of a Knowledge Broker

Giving It Away, Making Money

Greenhouses That Change the World

Cycles of Communication and Collaboration

What Is an "Integrated Solution"?

Thoughts about Value-Add




Best sellers from