Health Supreme by Sepp Hasslberger

Networking For A Better Future - News and perspectives you may not find in the media

Networking For A Better Future - News and perspectives you may not find in the media

Health Supreme

News Blog

Site Map





Food for Thought


Human Potential






The Media

War Crimes


Articles Archive


See also:


Communication Agents:

INACTIVE  Ivan Ingrilli
  Chris Gupta
  Tom Atlee
INACTIVE  Emma Holister
  Rinaldo Lampis
  Steve Bosserman
  CA Journal


Robin Good's
Web sites:












The Individual - Human Ability:


Society - Politics:






July 03, 2003

Fluoride - no thank you!

Bradford (UK) - A motion to say "no" to fluoridation of Bradford's water supply was passed by a large majority on July 1, 2003.

The Motion was presented to the Lord Mayor and Members of Bradford Council (UK) by Councillor Martin Love of the Green Party. It passed by a large majority and no amendments were brought, showing the full support of Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and Greens and most of the Labour Party councillors.

Fluoride however is still very much part of our daily dose of toxins. The European Union lists fluoride as an allowed "nutrient source" in the text of its Food Supplements Directive, which is to be converted into national law in all member states by the end of this month. Belgium is a notable exception. The country has prohibited the use of fluoride in all foods including chewing gums, in 2002.

The industrial fluoridation lobby with the help of largely uninformed dentists' associations world wide is currently renewing its push to recover lost fluoridation territory. After most European countries stopped fluodidating their water supply in the 60s and 70s, the British government is proposing now to exempt water companies from liability when fluoridating water. Turin in northern Italy is considering adding fluoride to its water and so are some communities in California and Canada.

Fluoride is a neurotoxin and sustained intake can cause changes in behaviour. The substance has been linked with increased incidence of cancer and a host of other adverse health effects have been documented. Fluoride is contained in many pharmaceutical drugs and may be at least partially responsible for their often deadly side effects.

Maybe not surprisingly, this poison is also contained in many pesticides liberally distributed in the environment, from where it re-enters the food chain.

The motion of Councillor Martin Love of Bradford gives an excellent overview and what's more - it was successful! Legislators, take note!


Lord Mayor,

It seems that every few years the subject of fluoridation of drinking water crops up with successive governments seemingly intent on foisting this dangerous and unwanted substance on an unwilling people.

Thankfully Bradford Council has consistently opposed the principle of fluoridation, in votes in 1988 and 1992, which some of you may remember, and with this motion today we seek to reaffirm that position and send a message to the government - that mass involuntary medication is unethical and a gross infringement of our civil liberties. The motion is similar to others being put forward for debate in Local Authorities up and down the country over the next few months in an attempt to let the government know how the people who drink the stuff feel about having their water tampered with.

We oppose fluoridation for three basic reasons:

Its supposed benefits are based on unsound medical science
It is harmful to humans, animals, and the environment
It defies all common medical ethics

So what exactly is it?

The fluoride added to water supplies is HEXAFLUOROSILICIC ACID, a real mouthful for anyone even when you have spent the weekend practising it, but not something you would want to get a mouthful of. It is a toxic and corrosive industrial waste by-product derived from the scrubbings of the factory chimneys of the super-phosphate fertiliser industry. Fluorides are medically categorised as protoplasmic poisons and they are used in commercial rat poisons. It is more toxic than lead and only marginally less poisonous than arsenic, and we all know about the efforts to remove lead from drinking water supplies over the last century. Worse still, the hexafluorosilicic acid used is not a pure compound of medical quality but is itself contaminated with other poisons such as arsenic and cancer-causing heavy metals like cadmium and even mercury. The US Environmental Protection Agency has recently admitted that it doesn't fully understand what happens to fluoride when it is added to drinking water.

The theory put forward by the British Fluoridation Society (which incidentally is financed by the taxpayer to the tune of over £100,000 per year) is that fluoride reduces tooth decay in under-12s, but recent large-scale studies in the USA, Canada and New Zealand show this to be an inaccurate claim. Even in the UK, studies have shown there is no difference in incidence of decayed, missing or filled teeth between fluoridated Gateshead, and socially-comparable, and unfluoridated Liverpool.

The National Pure Water Association has repeatedly asked the UK Department of Health to cite one scientific or laboratory study from anywhere in the world which proves that fluoridation reduces tooth decay in humans. They have failed to do so. The fact is that there is not a single scientific or laboratory study from anywhere in the world which proves that fluoridation reduces tooth decay in humans. There are, however, hundreds of published scientific papers which show that water fluoridation is dangerous to human, animal, plant and aquatic life, which is no surprise considering the relative toxicity levels of the substance.

That list of dangers to humans reads like a medical dictionary such are the effects noted in scientific papers from around the world. These include collagen disruption leading to breakdown of collagen in bone, tendon, muscle, skin, cartilage, lungs, kidney and trachea, and the inhibition of antibody formation in the blood and confusion of the immune system.

Fluoride kills red blood cells and damages gastric mucosa resulting in the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome. It is implicated in genetic disorders, low IQ levels in children, pre-senile dementia and Alzheimer's disease, premature ageing and thyroid disorders due to its disruption of iodine in the body. Fluorides have also been used as drugs for modifying human behaviour and moods.

It has also been argued that fluoride increases cancer rates. In a recent study it was found that, pro-rata, 40% more people contracted bone cancer in the Republic of Ireland, which is fluoridated, compared with non-fluoridated but otherwise similar Northern Ireland.

And that's just what it does to humans.

Artificial water fluoridation is pollution. More than 99.5% of fluoride added to drinking water ends up going down the drain. Even in the case of a small country like Ireland, this amounts to 2000 gallons of hexafluorosilicic acid being released into the environment every day, while the National Pure Water Association in Britain estimates that if the government were allowed to fluoridate 85% of UK water supplies, this would lead to an astonishing 45-50,000 tonnes of the stuff being poured into our environment every year. The dumping of such a large amount of toxic waste would be a serious threat to our rivers and plant and aquatic life. Water fluoridation also threatens the organic food industry as any crops irrigated with fluoridated water would be likely to fail the Soil Association's tests.

Elsewhere in the world, opinion has been turning against fluoridation for years. Japan, Germany, Sweden, Russia, Holland and Finland have all had mass fluoridation schemes and stopped them. France has never allowed it, and Belgium have gone a step further and banned the sale of fluoride tablets and chewing gum. Between 1990 and 2000, no less than 77 US and Canadian cities either rejected fluoridation or abandoned existing schemes, some after several decades of operation. In the United States since 1997 fluoridated toothpaste has carried a health warning in case of swallowing more than the amount needed for brushing.

And yet, despite all this, our government knows better.

If you are convinced of the benefits of fluoride, (which only exist until the age of 12 in any case) you can of course buy a fluoridated toothpaste. It is readily available and costs no more than fluoride-free toothpaste. You have the right to make that choice. But if the pro-fluoridation lobby gets its way, you will have no choice but to swallow fluoride repeatedly every day. You will always have to consume a cumulative poison every time you drink a glass of water or a cup of tea. There is no freedom to choose because you simply can't opt out.

It is the most basic of human rights that people should have control over their own bodies and clean water is one of life's most essential needs. Even if the claims of the fluoridators could be upheld, and the dangers I have described earlier were not real, I would still oppose this policy. This isn't even a matter of democracy or of majority opinion - it's a matter of personal choice and just one person being given this medication against their will is one too many.

We do not deny that there is a problem with dental standards in this country, but the mass medication of the entire population will do nothing to solve that problem. Tooth decay, whether in adults or children is due to poor dental hygiene and excessive consumption of refined sugar products, and fluoridation will not stop either of those.

Instead we need better education of both children and adults about dental health and the need for a healthy diet with a lower individual and national consumption of sugar. We would also call for a return to the days of free dental inspections for all.

I urge you to support this motion and support the health and human rights of the people we represent.

Let me leave you with a thought.

What action do you think would be taken against a GP who wrote a prescription for a patient he had never met or examined and whose medical history he did not know, and on that prescription advised no maximum dosage nor duration of course, just because some people say this drug might help reduce tooth decay in children?

Related articles:

Debunking the so called fluoride experts

Evidence of fraud in the matter of water fluoridation

Toxic fluoride soon unnecessary

Leading cancer researcher opposes water fluoridation

Prominent researcher apologizes for pushing fluoride

Behavioral Effects of Fluorides

How we got fluoridated - an interesting time line!

Think Fluoride is Healthy? Find Out the Shocking Truth in "The Fluoride Deception"

Toxic chemicals: the case against fluoride
By Mark Diesendorf - posted Wednesday, February 09, 2005
The use of fluorides in dental public health is an example of a class of chronically toxic chemicals that escapes the usual regulatory and assessment processes, avoids the fundamental principle of toxicology (namely to protect those at greatest risk) and violates medical ethics. Furthermore, it is argued here that the promotion of fluoridation uses the image of science while avoiding and misrepresenting its substance.



posted by Sepp Hasslberger on Thursday July 3 2003
updated on Wednesday December 8 2010

URL of this article:


Related Articles

Fluoride and IQ
The practice of dumping toxic-waste fluorosilicates into public water supplies in the name of fighting tooth decay has just received another damper. According to a recently released Chinese study, there is a clear relation between fluoride levels in the water that is consumed by a population and low Intelligence quotient scores of children who do the consuming. I wonder why there is a generalized push to introduce fluoridation in some... [read more]
August 25, 2003 - Sepp Hasslberger

WHO to review Fluoride Guidelines
Robert Pocock of VOICE, a campaigner for healthy drinking water, and specifically against the addition of toxic fluoride to the water supply, has said that the WHO is revising its Fluoride Guidelines, which were introduced in a rather clandestine manner. There may be just too much information coming to light about fluosilicates, a particularly nasty poison which is actually an industrial waste, and which in some countries is added to... [read more]
January 24, 2004 - Sepp Hasslberger

Food, Not Fluoride, Reduces Cavities
This is a good follow up on the earlier post: "Spin Doctoring: Toxins - Fluoride" as it always boils down to food but they can't make any money with this most effective of all remedies... Chris Gupta ------------------------------------------- Food, Not Fluoride, Reduces Cavities (CONTACT LETTER TO YOUR OFFICIALS INCLUDED) From New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation July 2004 Cavities occur in 66% of U.S. preschool children, and more often... [read more]
July 15, 2004 - Chris Gupta

Spin Doctoring: Toxins - Fluoride
Here is a book that further expands on the post 'Fluoridation Revisited' discussion of Spin doctoring: ..."The drive to encourage public acceptance of fluoride was handed over to Edward Bernays, known as the father of PR, or the original spin doctor, and the man who helped persuade women to take up smoking. "You can get practically any idea accepted," Bernays explained, "if doctors are in favour. The public is willing... [read more]
June 09, 2004 - Chris Gupta

Fluoride and Old Lace
The UK government is pushing to lace drinking water with fluoride The way is being prepared by a law which will exempt water companies from legal responsibility for adding an industrial poison to communal water supplies. The International Fluoride Information Network, in its latest bulletin, says that "unfortunately, it is too late to influence the House of Lords who incredibly voted to modify the water bill to allow water... [read more]
July 31, 2003 - Sepp Hasslberger

WHO Ignores Science, Questions - Recommends Toxic Fluoride
When the World Health Organization in its most recent issue of Drinking Water Guidelines recommends that fluoride should never be missing from our water, is it really doing the bidding of the Sugar Industry? Certainly dental caries is promoted by our consumption of sugar and sweets, including soft drinks, and the economic interests behind these junk foods are enormous. Fluoride provides a convenient "red herring" to put our attention on... [read more]
April 12, 2005 - Sepp Hasslberger




Readers' Comments


Posted by: Tjarko Holtjer on July 3, 2003 12:29 PM


Send more information thanks

Posted by: wayne on June 7, 2004 07:22 AM


You could try these articles on my site, and the links you find in them:

Fluoride and Old Lace

Fluoride and IQ

Fluoride in your bones - cancer ahead

WHO to review Fluoride Guidelines

Honolulu Bans Water Fluoridation

There are also external links to other sites dealing directly and only with the dangers of fluoridation.

Posted by: Sepp on June 7, 2004 10:04 AM


A question received by email (April 2005) and my answer:

There must be a reason for putting Fluoride into the water?

Does it mask or counteract some dangerous chemical that cleans the water or something?


apparently fluoride dulls the mind.

This is an article I found which discusses that angle of it.

Kind regards

Posted by: Sepp on April 14, 2005 09:48 PM


Dr. Judd's research is very impressive. I actually healed myself from harm caused by the dentists using his book. Please read some of the results of his research below, including the dangers of fluoride. The book offers more information on root canals, mercury, etc. Please consider the book for you store. Thank you, Patricia
To ask questions or order the book.

Letter from Dr. Gerard F. Judd, Ph.D., Chemist, Researcher for 18 years, Professor of Chemistry for 33 yrs.

April 2002

Dear Government Executive and Employee:

We can all stop spending billions for American dental work and research. Let me tell you why: I have learned the real causes of dental cavities and gum infection. People, including you, will now be able to take care of their own dentistry with insignificant cost, and end with perfect teeth. Cavities and gum infections are ended!

A great amount of REPUTABLE DENTAL RESEARCH proves the following:

1. Tooth cavities will be ended simply by rinsing acids off the teeth. ACIDS ALONE EAT THE ENAMEL. THERE WOULD BE NO CAVITIES IN THE WORLD if all people rinsed acids from their teeth promptly. Just sip water, milk or other liquid while eating. Water reacts with acids.

2. Foods and drinks, other than those containing acids, have no action on tooth enamel. SUGARS HAVE NO ACTION ON THE ENAMEL.

3. Bacteria cannot damage the enamel (calcium hydroxy phosphate). There is no such thing as decay of the enamel since bacteria require carbon and hydrogen to live. Billions of human and animal remains show teeth and bones are resistant to earth-bound organisms.

4. Teeth reenamalize when clean. TO MAKE TEETH CLEAN ONE BRUSHES WITH ANY BAR SOAP. Soap washes off in just 2 rinses. What about toothpastes? Glycerine in all tooth pastes is so sticky that it takes 27 washes to get it off. Teeth brushed with any toothpaste are coated with a film and CANNOT PROPERLY REENAMELIZE.

5. Taking calcium and phosphate in the diet results in reenamelization of the teeth, but only when they are clean. Bar soap does a perfect job in cleaning the surface. The enamel thickens and becomes less sensitive. Adenosine diphosphatase furnishes phosphate to teeth.

6. Gums are disinfected by brushing with any bar soap. Not only bacteria and viruses are destroyed promptly by small amounts of soap in water, but also white flies and aphids. Gardeners: Spray 1 tsp of dishwashing soap in 1 gallon of water to kill white flies and aphids.

7. Plaque, a poorly formed crystal stuck to the bottom of the enamel, is prevented and eventually removed by brushing with bar soap. Dental procedures to get the badly formed crystals off dig holes through the enamel. These cavities catch food and cause gum infection.

8. Prevention of plaque retards gum pockets. GUM POCKETS are formed as the plaque pushes the gums away from the teeth. GUM POCKETS, from 1 to 8 mm deep, ARE ALSO FORMED BY FLUORIDE, WHICH SEVERS THE PROTEIN MOLECULES ADHERING THE GUMS TO THE TEETH. SOAP PREVENTS GINGIVITIS caused by bacteria which is lodged in the gum pockets.

9. VITAMIN C AND PHOSPHATE help knit the gums back to the teeth. Pressing against the gums with fingers forces adhesive materials from the gums onto the teeth, which helps the process. Abscesses can be offset by holding Cepacol (14% alcohol) in the mouth 5 minutes.

10. 'Receding gum' surgery will end when the GUM POCKETS cease. The very mention of the procedure, which involves transferring flesh from the roof of the mouth to the excised area of the gums, is a heinous and useless procedure which ought to pass into oblivion.


12. As stated above, THE GUMS CAN BE RECONNECTED TO THE TEETH BY TAKING VITAMIN C (ASCORBIC ACID) (1 tsp) with Arm and Hammer baking soda (1/2 tsp) in 1 inch of water, letting it fizz and then diluting to 1/2 to 1 cup with water, then drinking. The resulting SODIUM ASCORBATE is non-acid, very pure and a thousand times more soluble than vitamin C. SODIUM ASCORBATE IS MORE REACTIVE THAN ASCORBIC ACID (C) in building connective tissue and antibody structures and more effective in killing some viruses and bacteria.

13. Receding gums and plaque are ended when soap is used for brushing and VITAMIN C IS TAKEN DAILY AS DESCRIBED IN #12.

14. 30% of American youths ages 8-10 have no cavities. 100% of Ugandan youths ages 6-10 have no cavities. What does this tell us?

15. THE REASON UGANDAN YOUTHS HAVE 3 TIMES BETTER TEETH THAN AMERICAN YOUTHS IS BECAUSE they do not consume as many acid foods, have no fluoride in their drinking water, have regular meals rather than sipping acid drinks all day, have more calcium and phosphate in their diet, and have fewer dentists to 'WORK ON' their teeth.


17. Dental literature says AMERICANS AGE 43 AVERAGE 32 CAVITIES, those AGE 17 HAVE 13 CAVITIES, blacks and poverty stricken (without calcium and phosphate) have twice this and the native Americans have four times this amount. The NATIVE AMERICAN PLIGHT CAN BE BLAMED ON THEIR POOR NUTRITION, EXCESSIVE FLUORIDATION AND FREE BUT IMPROPER DENTAL CARE.


19. Spokesmen for national groups are beginning to notice AN ALARMING RISE IN CAVITIES AMONG CHILDREN AND TEENS. Some dentists recommend DENTAL SEALANTS, especially for older teens not previously considered candidates for the treatment. But if sealants are now ordered, AREN'T DENTISTS ADMITTING NO CONFIDENCE IN THE ABILITY OF FLUORIDE TO PREVENT CAVITIES?

20. FLUORIDE in water at I part per million INCREASED TOOTH CAVITIES in four large reliable studies 7.22.45 and 10% (average 21 %). The reason far these increases has to do with the fact that adenosine diphosphatase is destroyed by fluoride and CALCIUM FLUORIDE which slips into the enamel, IS ALIEN TO THE TOOTH COMPOSITE AND MAKES THE ENAMEL WEAK, BRITTLE AND DISCOLORED.


22. Fortunately, we now know the current 'teeth perfecting protocol' of dentistry with fluoridation is flawed. IF THE EARLY ESTIMATES OF 80% TOOTH IMPROVEMENT IN CHILDRENS' TEETH BY AGE 13 WERE TRUE, EACH AMERICAN WOULD NOW HAVE LESS THAN ONE CAVITY. That is far from true. The teeth in America are in a sorry state, AND AT THE PRESENT TIME ARE GETTING WORSE.

23. Numerous top scientists over the past 60 years have discarded the theory that fluoride helps teeth, or is a nutrient helpful to man.

24. TO AVOID FLUORIDE IS TO PREVENT MORE THAN 114 AILMENTS listed with references in a book Good Teeth Birth to Death by Gerard F. Judd, Ph.D.. These 114 MEDICAL SIDE EFFECTS extend all the way from cancer down to headaches CAUSED BY 1 PPM FLUORIDE IN THE WATER. Thirteen of these side effects are proved by a double blind study on 60 patients by 12 physicians, 1 pharmacist and 1 attorney.

25. The mechanism for destruction of enzymes by fluoride has been proven by x-ray studies. Hydrogen bonds are broken by fluoride.

26. Fluoride is the smallest negative particle on the face of the earth. Since the FLUORIDE PARTICLES ARE SO SMALL and so intensely negative, THEY CONNECT WITH THE HYDROGEN BONDS HOLDING THE ENZYME COILS IN PLACE and ruin every enzyme molecule at very low concentration, around 1-3 ppm. These enzymes are often 3,000 or more times the small size of the fluoride. The effect is ruinous.

27. To avoid fluoride is to prevent the destruction of 83 enzymes listed with references in Good Teeth, Birth to Death, by Gerard F. Judd, Ph.D.. FLUORIDE IS A SEVERE BIOLOGICAL POISON. Being intensely negative, it unlatches positive hydrogen bonds in enzymes AND proteins.

28. It is fortunate we have learned fluoride is a nerve poison. FLUORIDE CAUSES CAVITIES. There is not the slightest doubt.

29. Methylmercury formed from amalgams in the body is deadly. It causes brain disease. Fillings made of quartzite and epoxy are a safe substitute.

30. Fluoride harms the economy by MAKING PEOPLE PURCHASE OTHER THAN CITY WATER to avoid it. It also harms the economy by making people dependent on undependable professions that know nothing about it. Ignorance about fluoride and what it does is worldwide.

31. Keep the teeth moist. Teeth that are dry 'craze' (crack). If you chew ice, teeth may crumble. Teeth do have a breaking strength.

32. LOOK IN YOUR MOUTH. Tell the dentist(s) what you want done and get several bids for examination and work. Save your fortunes.

We now know we can cancel the green light given by Harry Truman with the help of Congress TO SUBSIDIZE DENTISTRY. BILLIONS OF DOLLARS BEING WASTED in this regard (Public Law 755, June 24,1948) CAN NOW BE RETURNED TO THE TAXPAYERS.

I hope you will put this information in the hands of your Congress persons so they and we may alert the newspapers, radio and TV stations, magazines, and all other news media as well as their friends, families, and associates about this giant leap in dental technology.

I ask for your feedback on this letter and I would also like you to ask for feedback from the ones

Respectfully yours,
Gerard F. Judd, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus, Chemistry

PARTIAL CREDENTIALS OF DR JUDD -- as of March, 2005 -- 6615 West Lupine, Glendale AZ 85304
1. Ph.D. from Purdue University.
2. Researcher in industry: 18 yrs.
3. Prof of chemistry: 33 yrs; retired professor emeritus.
4. Fluoride laboratory studies: Linde, Purdue, Wright Field and Phoenix College, 13 yrs.
5. Author, revised: Good Teeth Birth to Death, 117 pp. July 1997.
6. Author, revised: Chemistry, Its Uses In Everyday Life, 305 pp. July 1997.
7. Author, Workbook, Self Quizzes and Laboratory Assignments for Chemistry, Its Uses In Everyday Life, July 16, 1997.
8. Author, Chemical Hygiene Plan, 89 pp., 4-23-1998.
9. Speaker, writer, radio host, bookseller, age 79, continuing as of March, 2005.
10. Fighter for truth in practical uses of chemistry.

Posted by: Patricia on February 15, 2006 04:07 AM


Thank You!!!
This is possibly the answer to my prayer! I've heard about distructive properties of flouride and was trying to keep my family away from it. But I did not know the facts. So when suddenly I discovered that my 1.5 year old daughter had bad cavities even though since birth she had no sweets, no juices (other than fresh squeezed organic, no milk (other than breast milk)it got me thinking that maybe I was wrong after all. In the last few days I went and got Tom's fluoride jell and used it to brush her teeth. But in my heart I felt the need to research more so I prayed for information and God answered. Now I need to try to find what could be the issue with my little one and what I can do about it. I have an appointment with pediatric dentist in a few days, but not looking forward to it... If you think you might have an idea, please let me know. If not, big thanks for the info you've already provided.



Posted by: Liliya Rymar on March 12, 2007 08:41 PM


I find your articles quite interesting and shocking. Maybe you could give us advice in regards to smoke stained teeth. Apart for quitting smoking, what else?

Posted by: Isabelle Depocas on March 20, 2009 08:52 PM


I'm not really in the advice business. In any case, fluoride stains teeth and there is no remedy as far as I know. It's also called mottling of the teeth. Other stains such as smoke... who knows. Everyone has their preference. Some use whitening toothpaste (it seems to work, but since it's abrasive, the enamel also suffers. I personally prefer to use hydrogen peroxide in a weak solution to brush teeth. Not giving you any advice here. Whatever you do is your business...

Posted by: Sepp on March 21, 2009 05:59 PM


Omg.. I am so angry.. I turned to pronamel toothpaste and Act to STRENGHTEN my teeth but they both have FLOURIDE- now my teeth are translucent on the bottoms. Please... what can I do to rebuild my enamel. I'm really devastated as I have never had a cavity in my life and always take care of my teeth.

Posted by: toni on April 12, 2010 05:04 PM


Security code:

Please enter the security code displayed on the above grid

Due to our anti-spamming policy the comments you are posting will show up online within few hours from the posting time.



The Individual Is Supreme And Finds Its Way Through Intuition


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

These articles are brought to you strictly for educational and informational purposes. Be sure to consult your health practitioner of choice before utilizing any of the information to cure or mitigate disease. Any copyrighted material cited is used strictly in a non commercial way and in accordance with the "fair use" doctrine.



Enter your Email

Powered by FeedBlitz



Most Popular Articles
Lipitor: Side Effects And Natural Remedy

Lipitor - The Human Cost

Fluoride Accumulates in Pineal Gland

Original blueprints for 200 mpg carburetor found in England

Medical system is leading cause of death and injury in US

Aspartame and Multiple Sclerosis - Neurosurgeon's Warning

'Bird Flu', SARS - Biowarfare or a Pandemic of Propaganda?



More recent articles
Chromotherapy in Cancer

Inclined Bed Therapy: Tilt your bed for healthful sleep

European Food Safety Authority cherry picks evidence - finds Aspartame completely safe

Did Aspartame kill Cory Terry?

Retroviral particles in human immune defenses - is AIDS orthodoxy dead wrong?

Vaccine damage in Great Britain: The consequences of Dr Wakefield’s trials

Archive of all articles on this site



Most recent comments
Uganda: Pfizer Sponsored AIDS Institute Snubs Natural Treatment Options

Lipitor: Side Effects And Natural Remedy

AIDS: 'No Gold Standard' For HIV Testing

Lipitor: Side Effects And Natural Remedy

'Global Business Coalition' Wants More Testing: But Tests Do Not Show AIDS



Candida International

What Does MHRA Stand For??

Bono and Bush Party without Koch: AIDS Industry Makes a Mockery of Medical Science

Profit as Usual and to Hell with the Risks: Media Urge that Young Girls Receive Mandatory Cervical Cancer Vaccine


Share The Wealth

Artificial Water Fluoridation: Off To A Poor Start / Fluoride Injures The Newborn

Drinking Water Fluoridation is Genotoxic & Teratogenic

Democracy At Work? - PPM On Fluoride

"Evidence Be Damned...Patient Outcome Is Irrelevant" - From Helke

Why Remove Fluoride From Phosphate Rock To Make Fertilizer


Evolving Collective Intelligence

Let Us Please Frame Collective Intelligence As Big As It Is

Reflections on the evolution of choice and collective intelligence

Whole System Learning and Evolution -- and the New Journalism

Gathering storms of unwanted change

Protect Sources or Not? - More Complex than It Seems



Islanda, quando il popolo sconfigge l'economia globale.

Il Giorno Fuori dal Tempo, Il significato energetico del 25 luglio

Rinaldo Lampis: L'uso Cosciente delle Energie

Attivazione nei Colli Euganei (PD) della Piramide di Luce

Contatti con gli Abitanti Invisibili della Natura


Diary of a Knowledge Broker

Giving It Away, Making Money

Greenhouses That Change the World

Cycles of Communication and Collaboration

What Is an "Integrated Solution"?

Thoughts about Value-Add




Best sellers from